Skip to content

Critical feedback from power users is ignored — time to open the AI debate #1918

Open
@mtoto73

Description

@mtoto73

[## The real contributors to AI are being silenced

OpenAI claims to be “open” — but critical and technical feedback from those who truly stress-test and improve the system is consistently ignored.

I’ve spent hours creating, debugging, and pushing the limits of ChatGPT through structured testing, prompt design, and actual improvement of real-world performance.

Yet:

  • Internal feedback is buried or unanswered
  • Reddit forums block all technical criticism
  • Email support sends only automated replies (or powerless agents like “Jose A”)
  • No channel exists for those who actually optimize the system

This is not openness. This is a locked feedback loop.


👉 I propose the creation of a formal, public-facing “Real Contributor Feedback Program”, where users who demonstrably help improve the model (through reproducible examples, bug isolation, tool building, etc.) are heard — and not filtered out.

This is not a complaint — this is a call to improve your system with those who care more than any premium subscriber ever will.

Signed: Il Maestro – stress-tester, contributor, technical strategist

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions