Skip to content

doc: cherry-pick tc-minutes from master#143

Merged
rvagg merged 2 commits into
nodejs:v0.12from
rvagg:tc-minutes-prev
Dec 11, 2014
Merged

doc: cherry-pick tc-minutes from master#143
rvagg merged 2 commits into
nodejs:v0.12from
rvagg:tc-minutes-prev

Conversation

@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Dec 11, 2014

Can someone tell me if this is the right way to do this? I just did a cherry-pick for the 3 commits that added the minutes to master and pulled them in to v0.12. I want to add two more files to this directory and v0.12 is probably the place to do it.

@chrisdickinson
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I imagine a cherry-pick should be fine -- usually things don't come into the branches from master, so there may not be a lot of prior art.

Comment thread doc/tc-meetings/2014-10-29.md Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This conflict should be resolved.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oo, thanks @gergoerdosi!

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM. I would squash eb3a24a and maybe mention the original commit shasums in the cherry-picked in the commit log ("This is commit 1234567 cherry-picked from the master branch.")

Fixes node-forward/node#4

PR-URL: node-forward/node#9
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>

@rvagg: cherry-picked 3cb5f3d from master to v0.12
PR-URL: node-forward/node#41
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>

@rvagg: cherry-picked 2c7847b and e7dec60 from master to v0.12
@rvagg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

rvagg commented Dec 11, 2014

@bnoordhuis can you check the commits now and let me know if that's good enough?

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes, LGTM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

5 participants