⚡️ Speed up function filter_sensitive_headers by 213%#10
Open
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
⚡️ Speed up function filter_sensitive_headers by 213%#10codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
filter_sensitive_headers by 213%#10codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The optimization replaces `any(key_lower.startswith(prefix) for prefix in sensitive_prefixes)` with the more efficient `key_lower.startswith(sensitive_prefixes)`. **Key Change:** - **Direct tuple prefix checking**: Python's `str.startswith()` method natively accepts a tuple of prefixes, eliminating the need for a generator expression and `any()` function call. **Why This is Faster:** - **Eliminates generator overhead**: The original code creates a generator object and iterates through it with `any()`, which involves Python's iterator protocol overhead - **Reduces function calls**: Instead of multiple `startswith()` calls wrapped in `any()`, there's a single `startswith()` call that handles the tuple internally in optimized C code - **Better memory efficiency**: No temporary generator object creation **Performance Impact:** The line profiler shows the prefix checking line (`if key_lower.startswith...`) dropped from 65.3% of total runtime (13.57ms) to 23.6% (2.12ms) - a **~6.4x improvement** on this specific line. This optimization is particularly effective for: - **Large header sets**: Test cases with 500-1000 headers show 200-350% speedups - **Mixed sensitive/safe headers**: Cases with both types benefit most (45-90% faster) - **Frequent prefix matching**: When many headers match sensitive prefixes, the reduced overhead compounds The overall 212% speedup demonstrates how optimizing the most expensive operation (prefix checking) in a tight loop can dramatically improve performance across all test scenarios.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 213% (2.13x) speedup for
filter_sensitive_headersinsrc/deepgram/extensions/core/telemetry_events.py⏱️ Runtime :
3.64 milliseconds→1.16 milliseconds(best of305runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces
any(key_lower.startswith(prefix) for prefix in sensitive_prefixes)with the more efficientkey_lower.startswith(sensitive_prefixes).Key Change:
str.startswith()method natively accepts a tuple of prefixes, eliminating the need for a generator expression andany()function call.Why This is Faster:
any(), which involves Python's iterator protocol overheadstartswith()calls wrapped inany(), there's a singlestartswith()call that handles the tuple internally in optimized C codePerformance Impact:
The line profiler shows the prefix checking line (
if key_lower.startswith...) dropped from 65.3% of total runtime (13.57ms) to 23.6% (2.12ms) - a ~6.4x improvement on this specific line. This optimization is particularly effective for:The overall 212% speedup demonstrates how optimizing the most expensive operation (prefix checking) in a tight loop can dramatically improve performance across all test scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_d0k9fm5y/tmpdeqw_shz/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_filter_sensitive_headerscodeflash_concolic_d0k9fm5y/tmpdeqw_shz/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_filter_sensitive_headers_2To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-filter_sensitive_headers-mh2vh80fand push.