Google Search Term: Seth Chromick
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive…
Seth Chromick
07-10-2003, 03:20 AM
I have XP and Gentoo linux installed. In XP, my IDE RAID0 config can be
seen and used flawlessly (highpoint). In linux, modprobe ataraid works
fine, but modprobing hptraid gives me "Raid array not found" a few times
and stops. Any ideas? I've googled around to no avail...
[...]
Alan Cox
07-10-2003, 07:30 AM
On Iau, 2003-07-10 at 05:09, Seth Chromick wrote:
> I have XP and Gentoo linux installed. In XP, my IDE RAID0 config can be
> seen and used flawlessly (highpoint). In linux, modprobe ataraid works
> fine, but modprobing hptraid gives me "Raid array not found" a few times
> and stops. Any ideas? I've googled around to no avail...
hptraid only understands a small subset of the disk layouts so not all
forms are known. Wilfried has done some really good work on this so more
formats are known by the later drivers.
Unfortunately HPT don't seem keen to document their disk layout.
Seth now is the coolest person in the world because Alan Cox replied to him on USENET.
Seth Chromick
07-10-2003, 03:20 AM
I have XP and Gentoo linux installed. In XP, my IDE RAID0 config can be
seen and used flawlessly (highpoint). In linux, modprobe ataraid works
fine, but modprobing hptraid gives me "Raid array not found" a few times
and stops. Any ideas? I've googled around to no avail...
[...]
Alan Cox
07-10-2003, 07:30 AM
On Iau, 2003-07-10 at 05:09, Seth Chromick wrote:
> I have XP and Gentoo linux installed. In XP, my IDE RAID0 config can be
> seen and used flawlessly (highpoint). In linux, modprobe ataraid works
> fine, but modprobing hptraid gives me "Raid array not found" a few times
> and stops. Any ideas? I've googled around to no avail...
hptraid only understands a small subset of the disk layouts so not all
forms are known. Wilfried has done some really good work on this so more
formats are known by the later drivers.
Unfortunately HPT don't seem keen to document their disk layout.
Seth now is the coolest person in the world because Alan Cox replied to him on USENET.

quixotic