Wikipedia talk:Dispute resolution

"Wikipedia:DISPUTE RESOLUTION" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wikipedia:DISPUTE RESOLUTION has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 18 § Wikipedia namespace shortcuts with spaces until a consensus is reached. SeaHaircutSoilReplace 21:45, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

References to "disputed article's talk page"

How should dispute resolution work when a dispute occurs on a user talk page? How should dispute resolution work when a dispute occurs across several articles? Landpin (talk) 04:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

How should dispute resolution work when a dispute occurs on a user talk page? If it's a content issue, one could ask the user(s) to discuss on the article talk page.

How should dispute resolution work when a dispute occurs across several articles? If it's a content issue, maybe a talk page section or WP:RFC at the biggest article's talk page, with {{Please see}} messages on the smaller talk pages linking to the big talk page. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:57, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Landpin (talk) 05:00, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

take me off every page of Wikipedia I'm on

Please take me off all your ancillary articles referencing me except Victor Carter. I value my privacy. I've been harassed at Wikipedia. Thanks, Leigh Silverton 189.176.5.73 (talk) 13:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Order issue

In the "Requesting other editors' help for content disputes", there is an issue with the order. It may not be a controversial issue, but I will address it here: The "Requests for comment" subsection has two more subsections below it, the "Third opinion", ideal for a dispute between two editors, and "Dispute resolution noticeboard". This subsection contains: Disputes are sometimes referred to a more appropriate venue (such as Requests for Comment). The "Requested move" subsection should be below all three, as it is a "potential" separate issue that is less common. At any rate, the opening paragraph states, Many disputes can be resolved without external input.... Many editors consider RFC, going to the more broadly advertised community, as a final potential solution, so I think it should be at the end. -- Otr500 (talk) 11:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Kindly look into it: Talk:Jurong Region Line#c-~2026-34399-55-20260611065800-Move discussion in progress

I spent a few hours to edit the article, to improve the grammar and readability.

And just as I was about to reach the end of the article, someone went to revert all my edits.

Please restore back my edits. ~2026-34428-95 (talk) 07:32, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2026

Mmason627 (talk) 07:19, 1 July 2026 (UTC)

requesting a change with you approval

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2026 (UTC)