Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history/Evidence

Main case page (talk) — Preliminary statements — Evidence (talk) — Workshop (talk) — Proposed decision (talk)

Case clerks: HouseBlaster (talk) & SilverLocust (talk) • Drafting arbitrators: Aoidh (talk) & ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) & Elli (talk)

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behaviour during a case may also be considered by the Committee in arriving at a final decision.

Evidence phase closing soon

The evidence phase of the case will be closing within 24 hours. Please submit any evidence soon. Also note that making new accusations close to the end of the evidence period is discouraged. – SilverLocust (Jenson) 00:16, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Cosmetic Comment

The heading Update in the Evidence Presented by Extorc has unbalanced equal signs. Correcting it is probably a task for an ArbCom clerk. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Fixed. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Timeline correction

In the "evidence presented by Ivanvector" section, subsection Parties do not attempt to resolve disputes through collaboration, please change:

−

for the period 1 January to 6 June 2025.

+

for the accounts' entire contribution history.

That is what the table represents and what I intended to post, I must have copied that timeline from another subsection. If anyone thinks it would be more useful to constrain this data to just this year, it's just a filter in my query to produce a new table. I don't, though: I mean to make the point that this disruption has been ongoing for many, many years. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:50, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

 Done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:33, 9 June 2025 (UTC)