Wikipedia:Peer review/Jasmine Crockett/archive1

Jasmine Crockett

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

I've listed this article for peer review because this article has been expanded significantly recently but I feel that there's also a lot of promo and that there are better ways to ensure WP:NPOV, especially in regard to the tenure section. I feel like there's also a lot that feels WP:UNDUE and that there are also an overdue amount of quotations from her and about her rhetorical style.

Thanks, Wozal (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by AdaCiccone

NPOV/UNDUE issues seem to be mostly in the Tenure and Rhetorical style. In Tenure, the way it's written now reads like a list of recent events (a clear issue of RECENTISM). I'd suggest rewriting it so this section revolves around major events and milestones of her tenure.
When it comes to UNDUE issues, Rhetorical style stands out. It's built around some widely circulated quotes rather than a wider (and sourced) independent discussion of her rhetoric. The way it's written now looks like a list of her viral lines than a proper writing of a biography section.
Some sub-sections in Political positions are glaringly shorter than others. Some are only a sentence long, while others are more developed like the Israeli-Palestinian issue, which creates uneven weight when the section is read as a whole.

That's all I could think of right now. AdaCiccone (talk) 05:03, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]