Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baliset (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 05:41, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Baliset (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little to no RS coverage of the subject. Fails WP:GNG. Damien Linnane (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if that's a viable option. I mean, Massi is only a former member of Maudlin of the Well, and there's also almost nothing about him at that page. There's also nothing currently salvageable with an RS source from Baliset (band) to merge elsewhere. Damien Linnane (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts on the sources above?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 03:31, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding the 10 new sources above:
'"soniccathedral.com", "thenewnoise.it", "iopages.nl", "femmemetalwebzine.net", "progressor.net" and "dprp.net" - none of these are mentioned positively or negatively at either WP:RSN or Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources. None of them fill me with confidence that they pass WP:RS.
Prog Archives and "seaoftranquility.org" are both blacklisted at WP:NOTRSMUSIC.
Blabbermouth.net and Chronicles of Chaos (webzine), however, are generally reliable.
So there's two reliable sources, two unreliable sources, and six possibly unreliable sources. Both the reliable sources are quite brief and limited in their coverage. I honestly don't know if they are enough or not. Damien Linnane (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Two reliable sources identified - do they also satisfy SIGCOV?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Goldsztajn (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Most of the sources above are reviews, databases, or small music sites with limited editorial oversight. The few stronger sources are brief and do not give enough independent coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. I do not see evidence of sustained notability beyond a niche side project. Juliasilas (talk) 11:21, 9 May 2026 (UTC) striking confirmed, blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:00, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.