Welcome

edit


Hello, Tymewalk, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – Gilliam (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Additions to German Wikipedia

edit

Hi Tymewalk, I'm working on publishing Bottega Veneta from English to German. I am wondering if you have time to help me out. I found your username on Wikiproject:Germany and saw that you're fluent in both English and German. I have a paid COI regarding Bottega Veneta, but my main concern here is ensuring that the information available in English is available and up to date in German as well. I have a translated version of the article on my colleague’s Sandbox. Would you mind reviewing it for accuracy as well as its compliance with Wikipedia guidelines? Thanks!--Chefmikesf (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Chefmikesf. I appreciate the offer, but I'm certainly not fluent in German, and wouldn't be able to help with what you're looking for. Good luck with your project, though! Tymewalk (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hi Tymewalk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Level of skill required to translate small articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your question has been answered at the teahouse!

edit
Hello, Tymewalk. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity. Message added by Signed,Benjamin Borg (Talk) 06:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hi Tymewalk! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is this a good template for similar articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bering Standard Time was blanked and redirected to UTC−11:00

edit

The page Bering Standard Time has been blanked and redirected to UTC−11:00 after its proposed deletion was declined by reasoning of redirects as an alternative to deletion. As you nominated the article to be deleted via WP:PROD, you may wish to restore the page contents and nominate it for a full deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. TartarTorte 21:31, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for looking into the page, I didn't see that NYT article while trying to find out if the timezone was ever used. Tymewalk (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Finding that NYT article was dumb luck on my end. I was trying to find a citation for when Alaska changed its time zones from 4 to 2 after reading about that elsewhere, but not at a source of whose reliability I was assured, which led me to that article. I wasn't able to find the article while searching for the term "Bering Standard Time" itself on google, only through that weird path I took above. TartarTorte 13:20, 12 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I did some digging and it looks like the timezone has also been called "Bering Sea Time", which appears in the NYT article. There's not many web results for either name of the timezone (and I think a lot of "Bering Standard Time" pages copied Wikipedia), but old newspapers seem to refer to both "Bering Sea Time" as well as "Bering Standard Time". I haven't been able to find any definitive sources as to which one is correct or preferred, but both seem to have been in use to refer to UTC-11 at some point. Tymewalk (talk) 03:52, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that as well. I've just created Bering Sea Time and targeted it to UTC−11:00 as well with an {{R avoided double redirect|Bering Standard Time}} to show the link between the two. TartarTorte 12:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nnena Kalu

edit

On 18 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nnena Kalu, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nnena Kalu won the 2025 Turner Prize for her brightly coloured sculptures wrapped in unspooled VHS tape? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nnena Kalu. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nnena Kalu), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

  Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 18 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2026 Hungarian films

edit

A tag has been placed on Category:2026 Hungarian films indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Balvir Singh

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Balvir Singh, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:12, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Cody Miller (politician)

edit

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cody Miller (politician), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Verkhniy Koropets moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Verkhniy Koropets. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Tymewalk. Thank you for your work on Juan Morales Rodríguez. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Mariamnei: Thanks for reviewing my page! I went back and made sure all the claims on the page were backed up by citations. Tymewalk (talk) 05:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I have removed the BLP template. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Tymewalk. Thank you for your work on Zimbabwe at the 2020 Summer Paralympics. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NSPORT. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Tymewalk. Thank you for your work on Yemen at the 2020 Summer Paralympics. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NSPORT. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:12, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Mariamnei:, thanks for reviewing my articles. I'm replying to both the articles for Yemen and Zimbabwe here, as IMHO notability is the same for both.
These are articles for a particular nation's performance at a sporting event, in this case the 2020 Summer Paralympics. While Yemen and Zimbabwe did not win any medals at these Games, other such articles exist even when nations do not win a medal - for example Zimbabwe at the 2024 Summer Paralympics and Liberia at the 2020 Summer Paralympics. I believe my articles are notable for the same reason that these are (or, in a more general case, any similar article for a country at a sporting event like the Olympics). This also seems to line up with the guidelines at WP:NOLYMPICS, which say Significant coverage is likely to exist for nations participating at an individual Summer or Winter Olympic or Paralympic Games. Tymewalk (talk) 19:20, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your response. I am not an expert in sports, but regarding your first point, please see WP:OTHER. Regarding WP:NOLYMPICS, it says that significant coverage is likely to exist; you should still establish the notability. If there's something in policy that I've missed, please feel free to write to me. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hello Tymewalk! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Notability for "nation at the Olympics"-type articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your RX of issue 31 of The Coelacanth

edit

Hi, just wondering if you still needed the paper you requested at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request/Archive_198#Article_by_Denver_Webb_from_Issue_31_of_The_Coelacanth_(1993)? ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 04:03, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@ARandomName123: I do! Do you have a copy? Tymewalk (talk) 05:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I'd filed an ILL back then, and just received it recently. Send me an email, and I'll attach it to the reply. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 16:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Tymewalk: Sent ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! Just got it now :) Tymewalk (talk) 04:30, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Powell Avenue Steam Plant

edit

On 9 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Powell Avenue Steam Plant, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a steam plant in Alabama complied with emissions regulations simply by building a taller smokestack? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Powell Avenue Steam Plant. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Powell Avenue Steam Plant), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026

edit

Information icon Before adding a category to an eponymous category, as you did at Category:UpShot League, please make sure that the category is appropriate under Wikipedia's categorization guidelines and is consistent with WP:EPONYMOUS.

An eponymous category is a category named after a subject that contains pages associated with that subject. For example, an eponymous category about a person, place, organization, or work may contain articles about related people, events, works, history, or other topics connected with that subject, not just the main article itself.

Because of that, adding a category to an eponymous category means that the added category should make sense for the contents of the eponymous category as a whole, not just for the subject it is named after. In general, the added category should apply to all or nearly all of the pages in the eponymous category.

For example, a category such as establishments in YEAR may apply to the subject itself, but usually will not apply to every page in the eponymous category, so it is usually not appropriate to add it there. Please also make sure that any category you add already exists. Categories that do not meet these requirements may be removed. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 14:11, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

About your contribution in 'Regions of Peru'...

edit

Thank you so much for adding back the flag of Ica! The previous user who upload it got all their files deleted because most of their contributions were only hoaxes. I tried back in time to get back the flag of Ica long ago, but they ignored my request. It is is great to see it back! Kind regards.TankFighter88 (talk) 17:16, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

No problem! Glad I could help :) Tymewalk (talk) 21:14, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Tymewalk. Thank you for your work on Christine Olson. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}.

Mariamneireach out 🕊️ 11:04, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :D Tymewalk (talk) 20:35, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Organized Labour September Editing Event

edit

You're invited to join the Organized Labour community editing event, a cross-wiki event taking place throughout September 2026!

The campaign brings together Wikimedians interested in improving coverage of organised labour, workers, trade unions, and labour history. We have confirmed collaborations with Wikipedia language editions in English, Dutch, Persian, Serbo-Croatian and French. If you want to add other language editions or other wiki projects you are strongly encouraged to do so! This event spans geography and languages!

This is a one-time invitation. You're receiving it because you previously signed a petition related to Wiki Workers United (WWU). We hope you'll join us!

Regards ~ Shushugah (talk) 14:20, 19 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Jessie Sanders

edit

Hey, this is a great new article, but I am concerned that the later biography and obituary are incorrect when they say she attended Arizona State University. I have a number of sources—one from 1932, one from 1948, and one from 1972 — that say she attended the University of Arizona. (And I found one more from 1929.) As a paid editor for ASU, let me reinforce that they are not the same thing.

I am inclined to believe this. While she was a teacher and it's believable she attended the then-Tempe Normal School, Arizona State was not a university in name until 1958 or in structure until 1955. Until then, there was one university in Arizona, the University of Arizona. Melted BrieASU (onward to victory · t · c) 06:18, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Melted Brie: Thank you for catching this! The Biographical Directory of the South Dakota Legislature incorrectly says "Arizona State University", and it's the only source that does so. I used it to start the article and forgot to double-check once I had more sources (even the newspaper sources I used when writing said "University of Arizona", so definitely an oversight on my part). I just updated the page now with the correct info. Tymewalk (talk) 22:23, 21 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

edit

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without a reliable source as a reference are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:54, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. I do have reliable sources for the dates of birth of the people I added, so I'll add those to the article alongside their listing. Tymewalk (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the Days of the Years (DOTY) pages were becoming a complete mess with incorrect and unverifiable info so things have changed so that all new entries require a direct source.
The DOTY project had exempted themselves from verifiability. As a result, almost none of the pages had any sources to back things up, based on the naive (and against Wikipedia policy) belief that all entries would be backed by reliable sources in the linked article. It turns out that was not the case and the DOTY pages were filled with incorrect info and even worse, other places started believing the info there and publishing the incorrect info in newspapers, for example on "Today's date in history" type listings (classic WP:CITOGENESIS).
So a few years ago the DOTY project took the bold step of requiring that all new entries be backed by direct reliable sources. Several of us have gone through and started cleaning things up. May 11 is an example of where we want to be. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page.
We could use your help in:
  1. Preventing new entries that don't include direct sources and when they occur, either supplement them with a reliable source or reverting them.
  2. Helping us clean up articles. The project members have asked all participants to go through their birthday and clean the entries up by adding reliable sources to each entry, or removing entries where reliable sources aren't readily available.
I hope this helps and keep up the great work! Toddst1 (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2026 (UTC)Reply