Techgamer534
March 2025
edit
Hello, I'm Rusty Cat. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lee Su-jeong without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Rusty meow ~ 17:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haechan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Haechan, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 16:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hearts2Hearts. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:07, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Taran Noah Smith. Why did you change a direct quotation? DonIago (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
edit
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ghetto Girls, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fromis 9. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. — 🎄☃️ Paper9oll ☃️🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 13:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manon Bannerman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. I have corrected it. Thank you for your advice. Techgamer534 (talk) 20:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
WARNING regarding introduction of unsourced and poorly sourced content
editTechgamer534, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Recently, you have been repeatedly reinserting material at Wonhee with citations to unreliable self-published sources (here and here) like iMDB and Fandom (kpopwiki). You have been warned several times about this, so I want to give you fair warning: if you add unsourced or poorly sourced content again at Wonhee, or at any article at Wikipedia, I will start a discussion at the administrator's noticeboard about your editing and seek to have your editing privileges suspended in order to protect the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you disagree, or if you have any doubts about what constitutes reliable sourcing or what this means, please contact the Wikipedia:Teahouse or WP:Help desk. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Wonhee. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Illit-related reporting, including routine and/or trivial information that is derivative and/or contextually driven. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Asa (Japanese singer) moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Asa (Japanese singer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG, WP:NBLP, WP:SINGER, and WP:BANDMEMBER criteria with no significant coverage for individual notability from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions from Babymonster-related reporting, including routine and/or trivial information that is derivative and/or contextually driven. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:59, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonhee (singer) (January 4)
edit
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wonhee (singer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Techgamer534!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC) |
January 2026
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:13, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Nmixx. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:28, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
edit
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary again, as you did at Aespa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 20:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Pentagon (South Korean band). This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.
Important points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 18:39, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Megan Skiendiel has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nighfidelity (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae (April 16)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sullyoon (April 16)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sullyoon to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae (April 17)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae Jeung (April 19)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae Jeung to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
April 2026
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Huh Yunjin. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 15:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haewon (singer) (April 26)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haewon (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunoo (singer) (April 26)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sunoo (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunoo (singer) (April 27)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sunoo (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haewon (singer) (April 27)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haewon (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazuha (singer) (April 27)
edit
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Kazuha (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Renjun (April 27)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Renjun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sullyoon (April 27)
edit
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sullyoon to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie (rapper) (April 27)
edit
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Julie (rapper) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haneul (April 27)
edit
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haneul to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
signatures
editHi, I notice you've added a bunch of signatures to infoboxes. The images have, on commons, got namuwiki as their source. How do you know these are the authentic signatures? And how can I verify that? WP:USERGEN cautions against user-generated contents like wikis as a source. Morwen (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I apologize for the oversight. I am relatively new and didn't realize that Namuwiki content is considered user-generated. For now, I will stop adding them until I can verify each one through an official primary source. Please, if you can, review the authenticity of the signatures before consider to delete them. Thank you. Techgamer534 (talk) 06:50, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
- I would love to do that, but there's too many to practically do. Morwen (talk) 12:20, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
edit
Your edit to Tzuyu has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 10:41, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, I have corrected the license of the signature. Please, if you can, review it. Thank you. Techgamer534 (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: HueningKai (May 15)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:HueningKai to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
AfC notification: Draft:Cocona (rapper) has a new comment
edit
Warning
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mckenna Grace. Seasider53 (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- Adding a 'birth name' without even mentioning a source, is eye-raising at best, but I count here something like half a dozens warnings for adding unsourced info to BLPs. This is, for real, your last chance. Morwen (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
edit
New message from Taking Out The Trash
edit
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation § Draft:Ricky (Chinese singer). Specifically, you are invited to explain why you moved that page back to draftspace without an edit summary. I presume it has something to do with WP:BANREVERT given that the move to mainspace was made by a sock, but there has been a concern raised about WP:DRAFTNO as well. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:16, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Han Yu-jin has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
grapesurgeon (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Kazuha (singer) has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
grapesurgeon (talk) 02:00, 13 June 2026 (UTC)Question
editHello. I don't understand why you did this? Could you explain. James500 (talk) 10:53, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- Because of this: WP:BLUDGEON Techgamer534 (talk) 11:11, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- In all fairness, this edit actually is an unambiguous violation of WP:TPO. I think you should revert that edit. There is no way that it was bludgeoning to point out that the unreliable sources had been replaced with reliable ones. The only thing that striking that particular comment will acheive is to seriously mislead the closing admin about the state of the sourcing in the article. James500 (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, I will revert that edit. But you must be aware that, no matter how much you try to argue to save the article, you will not be able to prevent it from being turned into a draft or deleted, since it is poorly written and referenced, and, as I said before, Kim Garam does not have enough individual relevance to have her own article. Techgamer534 (talk) 11:38, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
- In all fairness, this edit actually is an unambiguous violation of WP:TPO. I think you should revert that edit. There is no way that it was bludgeoning to point out that the unreliable sources had been replaced with reliable ones. The only thing that striking that particular comment will acheive is to seriously mislead the closing admin about the state of the sourcing in the article. James500 (talk) 11:16, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Renjun (June 14)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Renjun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Wonhee (singer) (June 14)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Wonhee (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Hong Eunchae (June 14)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Hong Eunchae to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Unreliable sources
editHello, I notice you cite primary sources a lot (namely YouTube videos) and often cite sources we consider unreliable (see WP:KO/RS; particularly WP:SOOMPI and WP:ALLKPOP). Please try to avoid doing all this. Primary sources can sometimes be cited, but only in moderation and sparingly when no other sources exist. grapesurgeon (talk) 01:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Youngseo (June 14)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Youngseo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
June 2026
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kim Garam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:00, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at D4vd, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. JFHJr (㊟) 18:24, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at D4vd, you may be blocked from editing. The source you added doesn't actually say his career ended. See WP:V. JFHJr (㊟) 22:04, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sullyoon. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:09, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cocona (rapper) has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
* Pppery * in solidarity 17:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Haneul (June 28)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haneul to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
- @Techgamer534 Four rejections is enough.
- You've now submitted this numerous times without proving independent notability for this person.
- Respond to this comment and acknowledge that you've understood this feedback. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:31, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Ok, I have understood that. Feel free to delete the draft if you want. Techgamer534 (talk) 11:33, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- It doesn't need to be deleted; she could become independently notable in future, just isn't at present.
- Also you've been doing similar for other drafts. Do you understand the concept of independent notability? They need to be notable beyond their group activities; like solo activities etc. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:36, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Ok, I have understood that. Feel free to delete the draft if you want. Techgamer534 (talk) 11:33, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
By the way, this guy may be one of those people who do not listen to others. This guy was told multiple times not to remove % from the hangul parameter of Infobox Korean name/auto, but they keep ignoring this.
~2026-37342-90 (talk) 19:13, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Techgamer534 stop removing the %. Respond and acknowledge this feedback please. The % is for formatting names correctly grapesurgeon (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Ok. Sometimes, when I was copying and pasting, I accidentally removed it without realizing. I'm sorry. I'll try to make sure it doesn't happen again. Techgamer534 (talk) 09:02, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you, no worries as long as you're accepting feedback grapesurgeon (talk) 09:03, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Ok. Sometimes, when I was copying and pasting, I accidentally removed it without realizing. I'm sorry. I'll try to make sure it doesn't happen again. Techgamer534 (talk) 09:02, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haneul (June 29)
edit
- evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for music;
or multiple published secondary sources that:
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
It is often easier to prove the notability of an album or artist than an individual song or band member. If the subject is not yet notable, consider improving a relevant existing article instead.Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haneul to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Emily Kelavos (July 2)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Emily Kelavos to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Samara Siqueira (July 2)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Samara Siqueira to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Lexie Levin (July 2)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Lexie Levin to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Independent notability from group
edit@Techgamer534 This is now like the 10th time you've gotten a draft rejected because you did not prove independent notability of a band member from a band. Do you understand what independent notability means? grapesurgeon (talk) 15:00, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon A little, but not quite, because I don't know to what extent an artist can have individual notoriety or not. But in this case, I hope that soon other users can help me expand the drafts of Emily Kelavos, Samara Siqueira and Lexie Levin, since at the moment I have not received any support from any other user for these three drafts, and I think that these three singers have potential to have their own article (Emily for her backgrounds as a competitive dancer and her participations in music videos of other artists like Adéla, Samara for her participation in music videos with The Bootcampers and Now United, and Lexie for her backgrounds as a songwriter and producer), and so I hope it can be soon or in the future. Thank you very much for letting me know about the inconvenience! Techgamer534 (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
- For articles about members of a band, you need to prove that the member is notable other than their involvement in the band. So coverage needs to be of significant stuff they're doing not related to the band, and it can't just be trivial stuff like appearing in advertisements or guest starring in a TV show. Those things are basically the result of their being in the band.
- This has been explained to you several times already; please make sure you understand this. Hopefully last time. grapesurgeon (talk) 05:09, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Techgamer534 Btw, do not resubmit the previous drafts haphazardly again; if you do I may seek admin intervention.
- If you plan to submit a draft, submit one and tell me so I can review that you understand what separate notability means. If you do, I will accept it. Then you can submit others, but only after you've significantly pushed them towards notability.
- Reviewers are human beings and volunteers, and you ate up a lot of our time unnecessarily. This is why I am angry. Be respectful to our time. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon I'm so sorry. It was never my intention to waste your time, and I won't let that happen again. Besides, I have made several improvements to Samara Siqueira's article, such as adding more individual sources. I'd like you to take a look at it. As you said, can I submit it so you can review it? Greetings. Techgamer534 (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- It's ok, thank you for accepting my feedback. Sure, submit it. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- Actually I just looked; she is still not separately notable, I think you still don't understand what this means. Basically all of her notability comes from her association with Saint Satine; I know she was in that contestant show, but that was really just a prelude to Saint Satine.
- You need to prove that she has significant individual notability from band. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Thank you for your response! I have a doubt. Her audition for Now United, her participation as part of the collective The Bootcampers, the details about her early life and the sources about herself are not enough to demonstrate her individual notability? Greetings. Techgamer534 (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- I think her involvement in The Bootcampers, at least presented in that source, doesn't seem significant. Also stuff about her early life does not add to notability; think you asking about her early life reveals you still don't quite grasp what I mean.
- Think of it like this: do any sources care about her for some primary reason other than that she's in Saint Satine? So far the sources you all provide just sorta briefly mention those things you asked about and primarily just care about her because she's in that band. grapesurgeon (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Ok, thank you to answer my question. After all, I have decided to leave it as it is for now and wait. I hope that soon, when Saint Satine make its debut, Samara and the other members of the group achieve enough individual relevance to have their own article, and also hope more sources appear that focus on them individually, apart from their activities with the group. Thank you for all! Techgamer534 (talk) 12:41, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon Thank you for your response! I have a doubt. Her audition for Now United, her participation as part of the collective The Bootcampers, the details about her early life and the sources about herself are not enough to demonstrate her individual notability? Greetings. Techgamer534 (talk) 11:41, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Grapesurgeon I'm so sorry. It was never my intention to waste your time, and I won't let that happen again. Besides, I have made several improvements to Samara Siqueira's article, such as adding more individual sources. I'd like you to take a look at it. As you said, can I submit it so you can review it? Greetings. Techgamer534 (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sullyoon (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sullyoon to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Haewon (singer) (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Haewon (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunoo (singer) (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Sunoo (singer) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Youngseo (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Youngseo to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie (rapper) (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Julie (rapper) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Renjun (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Renjun to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoonchae Jeung (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:Yoonchae Jeung to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: HueningKai (July 5)
edit
- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:HueningKai to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Renjun has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
grapesurgeon (talk) 07:27, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: HueningKai has been accepted
edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
- See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.
Future articles
- Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.
- Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Next steps
- Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
- Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
- You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
- Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
- The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
- For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)