Discussions from 2007 through 2010 have been archived here. 2011 through 2015 are archived here. 2016 through 2020 are archived here. 2021 through 2025 are archived here. Please start new discussions in a new section at the bottom.
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hey @Station1. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 19 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey and a blessed New Year.:) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙✉17:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service
While Baseball-Reference hasn't updated their Negro league data since 2023, Seamheads.com consistently updates. At some point in the last few months the Buddy Fields Seamheads profile was deleted (notice how it just redirects to their main page) Most of those stats (which can still been seen at the now-outdated MLB.com page) now lie in the Seamheads page of James Field MLB.com must have updated more recently than BR, because their Buddy Fields page has no stats, as they have been moved to James Field.
This usually happens when Seamheads researchers (mainly Gary Ashwill) find information to more accurately identify a player. Baseball-Reference should be updating their Negro league data with the latest from Seamheads at some point, but they don't seem to have any sort of timetable for that. Penale52 (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi. It is confusing, at least to me, and you seem to know more about the subject than I do, but there were so many differences, starting with the spelling of Field vs Fields, different places of birth, 1890 birth date for James but none for Buddy, different rookie years, with two different listings with different career stats at baseball-reference.com, that it looks like they must be two different players. But if you're confident they're the same, I'll just put a note on the talk page. Station1 (talk) 03:27, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
May 8–12: Discussion phase
May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hello. The reasons for changing "Bizcocho" to "Bizcocho (pastry)" or another name, for example "Bizcocho (xyz)," are several. I will post it on the discussion page of the current "bizcocho" entry on the English Wikipedia. When I have it done, I will let you know on User talk:Station1. Thanks, and regards. Jkasutoro (talk) 22:01, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.
Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.
Latest comment: 7 days ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Station1. It is true that each language on Wikipedia defines its articles, but if there is an interwiki link on Wikidata.
There is a Spanish article called es:Bizcocho with an interwiki link on Wikidata (Q1049852) to more than forty languages, including Sponge cake in English. Bizcocho in Spanish and Sponge cake in English encompass similar sponge cake varieties such as Castella, Pão de Ló, Genoise, Angel food cake, etc. These are what are generally known as Bizcocho in Spanish and Sponge cake in English.
There is a Spanish article called es:Bizcocho (Uruguay) with an interwiki link on Wikidata (Q4919380) to four languages, including Bizcocho in English. Bizcocho (Uruguay) in Spanish and Bizcocho in English (which should be called Bizcocho (Uruguay) in English) include similar varieties of pastry, cake or cookie, etc. The basis of both articles in both English and Spanish originated in Uruguay, where most buttery flaky pastries, including croissants, are termed "bizcocho", while sponge cake is called "bizcochuelo".
The situation is clear if you read them; that's what reading is all about. I tried to clear up the confusion created on the pages regarding what started in 2006 and 2007, with the meaning of "Bizcocho" in Uruguay, which was the origin of both the English and Spanish versions of the page. But it was impossible.
I didn't remember that I had reverted on another occasion (22:58, 1 May 2026). I won't be accessing that article again. Regards. Jkasutoro (talk) 21:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply