Qwerfjkl
| This is Qwerfjkl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: A, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82Auto-archiving period: 11 days |
Qwerfjkl (bot) – ~2026-39158-73
editPage: Capital_Red_Rose_Corridor
Diff: Special:Diff/1363434522
Comment/question:
How is this not a good citation?
~2026-39158-73 (talk) 04:30, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-39158-73, the author fields are incorrect and should be removed. — Qwerfjkltalk 09:57, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Question from Muffinbutt1985 (06:31, 10 July 2026)
editSo on this page it says there is a book about the guy slated for publication. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Dorsey_Swann Well, the citation is for an article from 2018 about the pending publication but it looks like for whatever reason the book never got published; I cannot find it listed on Amazon etc and it’s been sic years. (Seems a shame as this was an interesting fellow who definitely deserves a book about him. I was going to add the book to my to read list.)
I would like to edit the entry to explain the book didn’t get published, but I don’t know how to cite that; it’s not like they put out a statement saying “we decided not to publish after all”. There were press releases about publication and then just… no book. --Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Muffinbutt1985, do you mean "The House of Swann: Where Slaves Became Queens"? If so, it appears to be on Amazon, albeit unavailable to purchase. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:04, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- It’s not available for purchase ANYWHERE. It is registered with several major bookstores but not a single one has a single copy in stock, because the publisher never actually put the book out. There isn’t even a photo of the book cover in any of the bookstore listings. That’s what I meant by “can’t find it.”
- I’ve seen this happen before, bookstore and even library catalog listings for books that don’t exist. Publishers get bookstore catalog listings for books in advance of publication. This book has not been published. If it had been, there would at least be cover art for it. Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 10:10, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Muffinbutt1985, if all we have is speculation, then there's nothing to be done, I'm afraid. — Qwerfjkltalk 13:24, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- I’m going to put something on the talk page about it because I am extremely sure the book doesn’t exist. I did some more “original research” and the book is not mentioned on the author’s Instagram either. Has a “my writings” part on his Instagram with screenshots of articles about Swann, but no book. The book never came out. Muffinbutt1985 (talk) 16:50, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
- Muffinbutt1985, if all we have is speculation, then there's nothing to be done, I'm afraid. — Qwerfjkltalk 13:24, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – false positive
editPage: Chappaquiddick_incident
Diff: Special:Diff/1363699367
Comment/question:
Nvark (talk) 20:23, 11 July 2026 (UTC)
- Nvark, you didn't add a title. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:31, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – Jerodlycett
editPage: Lokesh_Anand
Diff: Special:Diff/1363764567
Comment/question: Given that I did multiple more edits after this to fill in the title with reFill, you'd think it'd realize that.
Jerod Lycett (talk) 07:51, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Jerodlycett, you left two references without a title. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:32, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- The bot posted at 2026-07-12T07:49:06. You can see the status of the article at 2026-07-12T07:36:24 which is twelve minutes and forty-two seconds before that at Special:Diff/1363764730. That is the problem. Your bot isn't off by seconds where we might call it a race condition. Your bot is making mistakes. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Jerodlycett, the references are still missing titles, right now. — Qwerfjkltalk 18:53, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- The bot posted at 2026-07-12T07:49:06. You can see the status of the article at 2026-07-12T07:36:24 which is twelve minutes and forty-two seconds before that at Special:Diff/1363764730. That is the problem. Your bot isn't off by seconds where we might call it a race condition. Your bot is making mistakes. Jerod Lycett (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 July 2026
edit- News and notes: An exclusive club
Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
- In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!
- Opinion: We need to innovate with Wikimedia decision-making
Rules we can actually read, trust and change!
- Recent research: LLMs and NPOV, 20 years of user blocks, Esperanto and Volapük Wikipedias
And other research findings.
- News from Diff: How to host Wikicurious in your own community
The Wikicurious team shares their approach to Wiki-event organizing.
- Community view: CUNY Newmark Wikimedian-in-Residence Quarterly Brief – April to June 2026
Quarterly update on the activities of the City University of New York's Wikimedian-in-Residence, Richard Knipel.
- Special report: Wikipedia escapes Category 1 designation under the UK Online Safety Act – for now
A possible future recategorization by the UK Government remains an existential threat to Wikipedia.
- On the bright side: Fatherhood, weather, and diplomacy
Father's Day, Canada Day, and the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence.
- Op-ed: A Layup Easy Proposal for Wikimedia at 25: Spend 25% of Donations on the Community
If strategy priority 1.1 is supporting the community, can we not increase the support to the community? Increasing grantmaking to 25% of the budget would be a move toward equality in the movement.
- Traffic report: The grass was greener, the light was brighter
We reached the dizzy heights of that dreamed of World Cup.
- Comix: schnozzed
on lollerskates
Qwerfjkl (bot) – BookMuffin
editPage: Wolf_359_(podcast)
Diff: Special:Diff/1363676533
Comment/question: referring to a publication to illustrate the reach of the work and the type of attention it received; publication name seemed more useful than author name in that context
BookMuffin (talk) 13:21, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- @BookMuffin, that's not what the author field is for. The "publisher" field is for the publisher (see Template:Cite web#Publisher for the documentation). — Qwerfjkltalk 14:01, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, ok, didn't fully understand how the bot works and what it was looking at. Wikipedia's citation tool auto-filled fields, so I went back in and manually updated them, which I think has fixed the issue BookMuffin (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Tech News: 2026-29
editLatest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
- Revise Tone helps newcomers identify passages in Wikipedia articles that may contain non-encyclopedic language and encourages them to consider revising the tone. The feature was A/B tested on the Arabic, English, French, and Portuguese Wikipedias, where newcomer task completion rates increased by 38.7% compared to the default Copyedit task, with no decrease in edit quality. The test ended on July 9, and the feature is now available for everyone on these wikis, configurable via Community Configuration. The plan is to release Revise Tone to more wikis.
- The community configuration that allows automatic removal of inactive mentors based on configurable criteria will be enabled on Thursday 16, on some wikis to keep mentor lists up to date. Mentors are experienced contributors who opt in to help new users on-wiki through the Growth Features. Administrators can now prepare the settings via Special:CommunityConfiguration/Mentorship; they will take effect starting Thursday.
View all 38 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, an issue where some users of the Wikipedia Android app were logged out immediately after signing in, preventing them from staying logged in and editing pages, has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- Editing a page via user scripts or gadgets was causing watchlist labels that the user had assigned to that page to reset. This has now been fixed.
- To work around a Safari bug (see phab:T425211), on Parsoid-enabled wikis, wikilink hrefs now use absolute urls instead of protocol-relative urls. REST API output remains unchanged and continue to use protocol-relative urls. Gadgets, user scripts, bots, and CSS might need to be adapted if they relied on the presence of protocol-relative urls in wikilink hrefs.
Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki
In depth
- The Wikimedia Foundation’s Experiment Platform Team has published a blog post reflecting on its first year of structured experimentation. It highlights successful experiments such as Paste Check, Reference Check, and Tone Check, which improved editing outcomes and have been rolled out to more users, as well as experiments that did not lead to product changes. Read more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
Qwerfjkl (bot) – 98uwd
editPage: Telstra
Diff: Special:Diff/1363121210
Comment/question: The bot gave me a false positive. The message left on the talk page directed me to this page for false positives.
98uwd (talk) 05:47, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
- Please disregard. I'm looking at the new, corrected citation. 98uwd (talk) 05:51, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
Articles for Creation backlog drive
edit
Hello Qwerfjkl:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.
You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Linebroken cite lint errors
editNot a fan of this bot creating lint errors in the notices to users who've made a citation issue involving line breaks in citations (typically in the url). While their edit being reported doesn't create a lint error, this bot's notice does due to being linebroken AND bulleted (why this counts as a "Misnested tag with different rendering in HTML5 and HTML4" I don't know). Could this be avoided in some reasonable way? Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 13:18, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, not always in the url it seems, but request the same nonetheless. Zinnober9 (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Zinnober9, I think an edit to User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform/middle could fix it, but I'm not exactly sure how this should be formatted. Any ideas? — Qwerfjkltalk 16:10, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have a specific recommendation. I've wondered if it would be possible and still useful to the editor receiving if the bot message could automatically filter/remove the linebreak and still share the link's text in question without the linebroken error, or if that isn't helpful to that user and needs to be displayed in a way that still keeps the linebreak, but isn't reporting this issue. @Jonesey95 do you have any wisdom on this? Zinnober9 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Cite templates can't have a line feed character in most of their parameters. Is there a way for the bot to replace any line feed characters in the quoted citations with space characters, as in this fix? As a bonus, the example citations will render better for the User talk recipient. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't have a specific recommendation. I've wondered if it would be possible and still useful to the editor receiving if the bot message could automatically filter/remove the linebreak and still share the link's text in question without the linebroken error, or if that isn't helpful to that user and needs to be displayed in a way that still keeps the linebreak, but isn't reporting this issue. @Jonesey95 do you have any wisdom on this? Zinnober9 (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – ~2026-40417-10
editPage: Stefan_Zweig
Diff: Special:Diff/1364981907
Comment/question: It looks fine to me. In fact, I did produce some kind of title for the template so I'm not sure your bot is working right.
~2026-40417-10 (talk) 18:25, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-40417-10, you used the wrong field; website instead of title. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:35, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
Qwerfjkl (bot) – ChipHSV1983
editPage: Ferran_Torres
Diff: Special:Diff/1365037246
Comment/question: The bot just gave me a false positive for my edit, nothing else.
ChipHSV1983 (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- ChipHSV1983, your reference has invalid
|last=and|first=fields. These fields are for the name of the human author, not the news site. — Qwerfjkltalk 10:36, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase
editThe RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase
edit- Copied from Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous) § May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase because this page is listed on Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Subscribe.
The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
Qwerfjkl (bot) – Keylanweylan
editPage: Attacks_on_the_United_States_(2000–present)
Diff: Special:Diff/1365179960
Comment/question: There is a false positive on the bot report to my edit. The generic name was replaced by the full source of the publisher. Keylanweylan (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2026 (UTC)