Pipe058

 User Page Talk

Welcome!

Hi Pipe058! I noticed your contributions to Wanda Maximoff (Marvel Cinematic Universe) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikipedialuva (talk) 02:33, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your diligent efforts to stop vandalism. Marleeashton (talk) 07:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

CS1 error on Burgan Bank

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Burgan Bank, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

You beat me to reverting that vandalism at Ryan Day (American football), thank you for watching recent changes & taking care of vandalism! Happy holidays! Schrödinger's jellyfish (talk) 04:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! pipe058 04:48, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious Achiuwa edits

Hello, the edits made were valid.

Precious Achiuwa’s hometown is The Bronx, New York as listed on recruiting websites. It’s where he lived from 8th grade on and as another previous source states he considers himself a New Yorker. Port Harcourt, Nigeria is his birth place.

Also, his high school Our Savior Lutheran is located in Centereach not the Bronx. It is stated later in the article his school was in Centereach and that should be consistent. 65.254.23.2 (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, while the information you have added may be correct you must make sure to provide a reliable citation. Thanks! pipe058 02:16, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

multiple warnings

that user should be blocked, but one warning is probably sufficient :-) thanks Andre🚐 02:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

yeah, i just realized it was the same user :p pipe058 02:26, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

No worries, good work anyway! Thank you! Best wishes, and see ya around. Andre🚐 02:27, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Run 3 (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lewcm were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article requires independent, reliable sources with significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Run 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lewcm Talk to me! 11:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Pipe058! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lewcm Talk to me! 11:04, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Run 3

Hello, Pipe058. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Run 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

God is Love

God is Love Pentecostal Church (Diff ~1248864887)
The revert was in good faith, but the IP removed the content which was uncited and comes under WP:OR. Hence, when you are restoring, you added an uncited OR content. Thanks for the reverts and your patrolling, but please be mindful of these reverts. I have cleaned up the article for now. You may go through it and clean it further. Thanks and happy editing :) — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Removal of Section from Emotion

I eliminated "=== Western theological ===" because its language was suggestive that the perspective it represented was correct. S1r Gawa1n 2004 (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for you work removing npov content but try to include a reason. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 20:49, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

No problem! S1r Gawa1n 2004 (talk) 21:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

that page was already deleted by an admin

This is new page with All LLM text being removed. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 03:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Good job on your work removing this content, but you still cannot remove this tag until it has been approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 03:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Pls check in LLM checker and remove the tag as it took lot of effort from my end in recreating and adding correct sources. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 03:57, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Whether you have removed or fixed the content, the Speedy deletion notice must stay up until it has been manually approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 04:01, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes correct but pls check in LLM checker Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Once again, it does not matter if the content has been fixed or not, do not remove the notice until your appeal has been approved. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:10, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I am not removing the notice. I am asking u to check in AI checker for LLM text if any after I updated. Just tagging the article as speedy deletion will not help, you need to see if after updating whether the issue is fixed or not assuming good faith. Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:13, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I've ran your text through an AI checker and much of the content on your page seems to be written using an LLM. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:24, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I rewrote the entire article in the past 1 hr each and every line. Again i will rewrite manually.Agnirmurdhadhiva (talk) 06:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Edit war notice

Would you consider pulling back the edit warring notice you just left at User talk:~2026-16450-95? It's possible there was a misunderstanding about what they were trying to do. Joyous! Noise! 04:27, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank for letting me know. I've removed it. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 04:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Look at the edit history carefully: I did not violate the three revert rule since I've modified the wording each time for a better translation, and you were the one who reverted it thrice without explanations. ~2026-16450-95 (talk) 04:30, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Received my information on into the spider verse

I don’t understand why you just removed my contribution information for the Wikipedia page of the film in the summary section of Into the Spider-Verse. I felt that was unfair and frankly a bit rude to just erase my information like that, when I specifically put my reasonings and even said I was going to add a citation which I was about to until I saw that you removed my information which I’m unhappy about. Rj 8899 (talk) 06:11, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Using words like "widespread acclaim" and "innovative" fall under the category of words to avoid, in MOS:WTW, and generally don't hold a neutral point of view, as per WP:NPOV.

As per your claim that it was widely recognized as one of the greatest films of all time, this should be based on comments from multiple sources for which you can cite them. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:18, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I get where you’re coming from, but I have to beg to differ on that, because those are neutral, because they are actual facts to what the film received and the innovative part is especially a neutral thing too because it’s referring to the animation industry and there’s even information already said in the page that backs up that information saying words similar to innovative and widespread acclaim regarding the film and its success in the animation industry. Rj 8899 (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I see what you mean now by innovative, so as for now I will attach a citations needed tag until you can provide multiple sources to back up this claim.

Keep in mind that all information must have its own citations and cannot rely on information already in Wikipedia articles. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Neutrality

I recently noticed you undid my edits on Audacity and Ray Comfort. Could you explain why you did that, and the reasoning behind that? The Conservative Journalist (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I would tell you about NPOV violations in your content, but after reading your work, and seeing "Here is an expanded Wikipedia-style Early life section for Ray Comfort:" in your content, I've ran your work through an LLM detector and see most of your work is partially or completely written by an AI model. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 20:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

That was written by me, not AI. And AI detectors are not accurate. Now, you better make sure you are doing the right thing. The Conservative Journalist (talk) 21:23, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to believe you wrote it, but when multiple of your large edits trip multiple different detectors, it becomes hard to believe you wrote it.

Either way, your edits, such as to Audacity (audio editor) and Ray Comfort contain content that doesn't align with the neutral point of view Wikipedia articles should have. Consider reading WP:NPOV, MOS:WTW, WP:CITE, WP:V and WP:PROMO in order to ensure the neutrality and verifiability of your content. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 21:31, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

I agree 100% with pipe058. It's patently obvious that these were LLM-written, without needing to consult an LLM detector. And that's before the fact that you left in a message from the LLM in one of your edits. If you stop using LLMs going forward, there probably won't be any issues. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 07:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Edits on Emigrant Gap Jane Doe removed

it was just released today as Melinda "Pip" Beardsley because she was identified by moxxy forensics I only added the name because Wikipedia is slow on adding identities of john/jane does even when mentioned by reliable sources if you won't add the name could you atleast delete the page Spongebobfan93 (talk) 18:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

@Spongebobfan93 I have already added the content back into the page with the proper citations.

Wikipedia isn't "slow" for requiring editors to take an extra few minutes finding sources for their claims. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 18:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Regulation

Hello. I received your message regarding the edit I made on the Regulation. Thank you for your message. You obviously made a mistake. There was a missing definite article in the phrase "in economy." It makes no sense in standard English. I only added "the" to make it grammatically accurate. How is that not constructive?

If the phrase had been "in economics,"it would have been correct. But "in economy" is grammatically incorrect. I mean,isn't this obvious? Kasriski (talk) 07:32, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

@Kasriski Thanks for letting me know. While "in economy" isn't right, "the economy" also isn't right as it would refer to a specific economy, not the study/application of it. I have replaced it with in economics, per your suggestion. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 07:35, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Benito Juarez 3/29/26

I made a minor edit to the opening paragraph in Benito Juarez’s Biography. There was no space between 26th and president, so it read Juarez was the 26th president of Mexico. I just added a space so it read “26th president” instead of “26thpresident.” You reverted my edit because you thought I was practicing and suggested I use the sandbox for that. I accidentally added an extra space and it changed the format. That’s why there are like 2 edits one right after the other. I applied my edit again to Benito Juarez and corrcted another sentence with the same issue : lack of spaces. I made the mistake of editing with no edit summary. In the future I will provide an edit summary with my edits so my intent is clear. Thanks for your consideration. ~2026-17249-59 (talk) 01:19, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-17249-59 thanks for letting me know but I have just checked the history for the page and there seems to have been a space there? I'm not sure if this is an issue with how it is displayed for you but it's fine now. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 01:22, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I applied my edit, including an edit summary. Spaces showed when I was editing, might be a computer glitch. All I had to do was delete the space and then add it, and the spaces were applied. ~2026-17249-59 (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-17249-59 Either way, there is a space in the correct spot now. If it doesn't show up for you that's almost definitely something on your end. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 01:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Highmead school

hey, can you revert my comments about the school being owned? Its owned by myself and im trying my best to restore the place but because everyone thinks its abandoned they keep breaking in and smashing things up. Ive spent tens of thousands of pounds in fixing things and its for nothing. Regards, Nathan Nathanboomsma (talk) 18:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

@Nathanboomsma Despite whatever work you're doing to the school, you changed the content of the article to something contrary to the information in the current citations. If you read my comment I left on your temporary account at User_talk:~2026-20867-35, you'd have read that all information on Wikipedia must be verifiable by a reliable source. If you'd like to reinstate your edits to the page, you can visit them in the history and add in proper citations. Thanks! pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 19:12, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

You removed my info I added on SCP 173 why?

Why did you do that? ~2026-21121-67 (talk) 05:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-21121-67 Your added content had multiple issues with it, such as not citing any sources, not following a neutral point of view, and not following an encyclopedic tone. I suggest you read the pages I have linked and rewrite your content following these guidelines. Your previous edits are saved in the article's edit history. Thanks! pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Am I in trouble? ~2026-21121-67 (talk) 04:15, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-21121-67 Of course not. You are still free to make edits on Wikipedia as long as they follow the policies and the Manual of Style.

If you still need help learning how to edit you can visit the introduction page and view the tutorials on how to edit properly. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:31, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi.

Related to the message you sent, i put on the ‘describe what you changed’ that he did NOT put this out on socials, etc.. I would know, because he barely has socials, and does not want to put potential misinformation on the news or anything of thats sort. Lagom1993mako (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

@Lagom1993mako I'm sorry I don't get what you mean. You added something to the article stating he said something without providing a reliable source. As I mentioned in the note I left on your talk page, "On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable." Please take some time to read WP:CITE and WP:RS on how to find and add reliable sources to your content. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:35, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Im sorry, that’s impossible. Lagom1993mako (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

As stated, he did NOT post this on socials or news Lagom1993mako (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Qatar is VERY tight at the moment, and he (as aforementioned) did not want to spread possible misinformation. Lagom1993mako (talk) 05:37, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

@Lagom1993mako I understand this but until you can find a reliable source to show he said that, your content is uncited and will be removed per Wikipedia's citation policies at WP:BURDEN. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:40, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

Incorrect information.

This page is full incorrect information. Someone is trying to smear their political rivals.

Dnyaneshwar Vidyapeeth ~2026-22851-69 (talk) 06:19, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-22851-69 Hello, the page in question does seem to have some content that is rather libelous but still somewhat correct. If you want to change this content, please change the content or tone of the article.

You also use edit summaries like "info" or "grammer" when remove the content. These inaccurate edit summaries make it impossible to know why you were removing the content. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 06:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

stop changing my edits

its not vandalm. just stop ~2026-23469-59 (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-23469-59 I did not remove your edits on the basis of vandalism, I removed them on the basis that they violate Wikipedia's Neutral point of view guidelines.

Using words like "high intellect", "fun learning" and "fun environment" directly go against this guideline. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 21:48, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

dälek isn't strictly pronounced one way.

I think the difference between saying it's pronounced one way, and saying it's pronounced in any slang way is difference enough to be noted. And this isn't coming from nowhere, it comes from MC dälek himself in this interview at 8:32. I can't put YouTube links apparently. You can look up "Dälek Interview - Special Features Podcast - Episode 060," and should be able to find it. ~2026-23439-93 (talk) 04:38, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-23439-93 First, what do you mean by "pronounced with any slang pronunciation of the word "dialect"". What slang pronunciation are you referring to? And if you have a source for why this pronunciation is correct, please add it to the article along with your changes. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 04:43, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Pipe058. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:48, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 23:05, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Rapid warning escalation on User talk:~2026-24132-68

Hello Pipe058. I was looking over recent edits and noticed your interaction with the IP editor regarding the Ty Mueller article.

While enforcing WP:BLP policy is certainly important, I wanted to point out that escalating from a Level 1 notice to a Level 3 block warning in the span of just nine minutes (12:58 am to 1:07 am) is unhelpful and overly aggressive. It does not give a new or unregistered editor any realistic amount of time to see the first message, figure out what went wrong, and provide the sources—which they actually did manage to do just a minute later at 1:08 am.

Rapidly climbing the warning ladder like this goes against the spirit of WP:BITE and WP:AGF. In the future, please give editors a reasonable window of time to respond to an initial notice before jumping straight to severe warnings. Thank you. Owl.Haworth (talk) 05:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for letting me know. I did realize my mistake (after thinking these were three separate editors and pages) and helped the editor correctly add in their information, but I will make sure to pay more attention to warning users making constructive edits. Thanks! pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:18, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Heeseung

Heeseung did leave ENHYPEN. Maybe they disagree with this decision?

https://www.straitstimes.com/life/entertainment/why-did-heeseung-leave-k-pop-boy-band-enhypen Polygnotus (talk) 05:39, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I'm not too sure? It could be true that they disagree. Either way their additions are unsourced and remove an entire section that would remain whether he left or not. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 05:45, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Im sorry for that one dude

Totally embarrassing. I meant to highlight the vandal, not revert you.

Now if you'd excuse me, I am going to hide my face in shame :P Plasticwonder (Cat got your tongue?) 03:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

It's okay! I've almost done that a few times myself :v pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 03:27, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

lemme publish my edit bro, vaughan is my ancestor

pls bro ~2026-25038-71 (talk) 00:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-25038-71 Unfortunately, unless you have a reliable source for your information, your edits cite your "original research", which is not a reliable source per Wikipedia guidelines at WP:OR. Unless your content has a reliable source, it will be removed once again, as per WP:BURDEN pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 00:25, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

im new to wikipedia, and i checked ancestry dna and it verified all of my info, then i checked wiki tree and it also verified it ~2026-25038-71 (talk) 00:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-25038-71 You still must provide an inline citation to a publicly available book, article or other source. Consider reading WP:CITE and WP:V on how to find reliable sources for your content. pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 00:29, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

i swear man ~2026-25038-71 (talk) 00:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

im sorry, but im not sure what else to tell you other than that :v

almost everything you add onto an article, especially birth dates, must have reliable sources to back them up pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 01:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

hey, im gonna try again to try and add something and i wanna know if | birth_date = c. 1460 works for a birthdate source Howtiedoyou (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

about the Eisenhower High School page

hey friend, thank you extremely much for fixing Instead of deleting my edit, i worked hard on it and im very happy someone took time to do that wonderful thing, if you possibly can, can you also take time to look at the new edit I made to the Eisenhower page, if you can possibly do the the same thing with not deleting it, But correcting it that would be the best thing ever, i'm pretty sure I have it all corrected, and okay? Because I added information and made sure to make the new eisenhower The priority Royknobel (talk) 09:44, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I also won't edit the eisenhower page anymore.But I just wanted to be really helpful Royknobel (talk) 09:49, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

@Royknobel You're welcome! I'm happy to work over your new edits (which I'm in the process of doing now). I will try my best to keep all the content but sometimes the best way to go about fixing things is just removing them altogether. You're also free to keep editing the page if you'd like! Just because you've made a few mistakes in the past, you shouldn't feel the need to stop editing all together. Thanks for your contributions and happy editing! pipe058^{Talk * Contribs} 17:18, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

thank you friend 🧡 Royknobel (talk) 23:06, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:19, 20 May 2026 (UTC)