Welcome

edit

Hi ILoveSmallEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

February 2025

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm FlightTime. Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Five Finger Death Punch even if you provide a/some source(s), you'll still need to start a discussion on the article talk page to allow editors who regular watch that page a chance to discuss the reliability of the source(s) you provided. One reason is, genre sources can easily be considered an opinion and not fact. Genre's are a touchy subject here on Wikipedia and without discussion/consensus, regardless of your source(s), your addition or removal will most likely be reverted. Your edit has been reverted and archived in the page history for now.

Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.

Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Abney317 for deletion

edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abney317 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abney317 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Leicesteroftime (talk) 00:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

WP:IMDB may not be used for BLP edits

edit

Information icon Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:54, 5 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

December 2025

edit

icon Hello, I'm Bridget. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Jake Paul, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bridget (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: GreenSuigi (March 1)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, ILoveSmallEdits! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Randy Stair

edit

Information icon Hello, ILoveSmallEdits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Randy Stair, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Randy Stair

edit

Hello, ILoveSmallEdits. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Randy Stair".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:56, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Beck Abney

edit

Information icon Hello, ILoveSmallEdits. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Beck Abney, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Riedman (July 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
fails to meet WP:PROF. Does not meet any of the specific criteria (or if they do it's not plainly shown in the article). Beyond that we would need to see WP:SIGCOV of the subject, which requires multiple sources about the subject independent of the subject. Eg, the ISU article provides sig coverage, but is not independent of the subject. The rest of the articles covering it, cover the database as their subject and not the prof themselves.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:David Riedman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply