Welcome

edit

Hello, Dragisdr20, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayyaloori Subhan Ali (February 26)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Doesn't appear to satisfy the requirements of WP:NPOLITICIAN.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Dan arndt Dragisdr20 (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dragisdr20! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayyaloori Subhan Ali (February 26)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do NOT resubmit without addressing the issues already raised by reviewers.

It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.

It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:ANYBIO criteria #3, because XXXXX").
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Cabrils (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayyaloori Subhan Ali (February 28)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Need to provide clear sources that confirm he is an elected official, as per WP:NPOLITICIAN. Needs inline citations, as per WP:REFB.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yerragundla (February 28)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Killarnee was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Yerraguntla. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
An article about the town Yerraguntla does already exist, please improve the existing article instead of creating an obsolete draft. Thanks,
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Killarnee (talk) 22:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yerragundla (February 29)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 09:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ayyaloori Subhan Ali (February 29)

edit
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Not meeting WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.
Hitro talk 09:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yerragundla (February 29)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Article creations

edit

Hello, thank you for your contributions. How about improving existing articles instead of creating new? I saw that the article Draft:Yerragundla (which is by the way a misspelling) that you created as a draft already exists. Your draft cannot be move to mainspace at all, simply because the article already exists.

And please work on your drafts, if you change just a few characters and then submit again, you will get another rejection. This just creates unnecessary work for you and the reviewers.

If you have any questions, feel free to reply to me here or ask in the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Have a nice day, Killarnee (talk) 14:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ayyaloori Subhan Ali

edit

Hello, Dragisdr20

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ayyaloori Subhan Ali, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Ayyaloori Subhan Ali

edit

Hello Dragisdr20, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ayyaloori Subhan Ali, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayyaloori Subhan Ali.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yeraguntla Sirivella Mandal moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Yeraguntla Sirivella Mandal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Killarnee (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeraguntla Sirivella Mandal (March 13)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shewasafairy was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
She was afairy 05:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeraguntla Sirivella Mandal (March 13)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1AmNobody24 was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No inline citations at all.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nobody (talk) 09:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gangula Brijendra Reddy

edit

Hello, Dragisdr20

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Chaotic Enby, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Gangula Brijendra Reddy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 04:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Dragisdr20. Thank you for your work on Gangula Brijendra Reddy. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a ref from the ECI site or from a newspaper

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of AHB Flowers Marchant

edit

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AHB Flowers Marchant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 18:09, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yeraguntla Sirivella Mandal (March 14)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Review WP:REFB as previously advised. Do not resubmit until references are fixed. Consider asking on the talk page of myself or previous reviewer is you aren't sure, do not just resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 18:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit