Welcome!

edit

Hi Dofrg! I noticed your contributions to Yassamin Ansari and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 03:13, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

October 2025

edit

Hello, I'm Plutus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mel Gibson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Plutus 💬 mess Fortune favors the curious 01:16, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Group (May 11)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Naraht, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.
Basically the draft needs sources outside the Oberlin group itself. Please use Annapolis Group as a general guide for references from outside oberlingroup.org. I look forward to the draft meeting those requirements.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Oberlin Group to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Naraht (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Dofrg! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Naraht (talk) 19:48, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Oberlin Group...

edit

Probably worth having on Wikipedia, but the draft doesn't meet the requirements for sources that don't come directly from oberlingroup.org Naraht (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Got it, I will update the page with more varied sources and resubmit. Thank you for reviewing! Dofrg (talk) 04:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Group (May 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, HitroMilanese, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Please see WP:NCOMPANY and demonstrate notability accordingly. Currently, the submission is largely depended on primary sources.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Oberlin Group to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Hitro talk 05:56, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oberlin Group (May 12)

edit
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, CNMall41, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Of the sources added since last decline, none of them meet WP:CORPDEPTH.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Oberlin Group to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

CNMall41 (talk) 19:11, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply