Welcome!

edit

Hi Jet Pilot! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. I appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism – if you'd like to get more involved, you may want to check out the some anti-vandalism tools or enroll in the Counter-Vandalism Unit's training academy.

Thanks for sweeping up after vandals!
Thanks for sweeping up after vandals!

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 02:00, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

You made a mistake in the edit poker face

edit

The edit has nothing wro g Jan Otuwi (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You've been both very diligent and quick-on-the-draw with reverting vandalism today. It's appreciated! AntiDionysius (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@AntiDionysius Thank you!  Tres Libras (talk) 22:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
What? 2605:A601:AE78:B900:2300:B866:220E:1E9B (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

The first page of history of Pakistan is written wrongly, we all know "pakistan and Bangladesh were part of Bharat/India since more than 3000 years & later a Greek scholar named Bharat as "India" during Mauryan empire's era".. but this particular sentence isn't written in this article.

edit

The first page of history of Pakistan is written wrongly, we all know "pakistan and Bangladesh were part of Bharat/India since more than 3000 years & later a Greek scholar named Bharat as "India" during Mauryan empire's era".. but this particular sentence isn't written in this article. Ayatsiddique11 (talk) 18:39, 13 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

+rollback

edit

Hi Jet Pilot,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
  • Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
  • Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
  • Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
  • If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:17, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

@ToBeFree: thank you! Jet Pilot (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kayla Braxton

edit

Please be more careful. There's no point in reverting to the wrong version. Meters (talk) 22:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page, really appreciate it. Knitsey (talk) 04:23, 6 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Knitsey: you're welcome. You can always count on me. Jet Pilot (talk) 06:33, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hey Man

edit

Yo User:Jet Pilot check my talk page I left you a message. 76.78.159.18 (talk) 01:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you!

edit
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Here's a barnstar for having a quick dead-eye on vandals, thank you! Unit Mango (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Unit Mango thank you! Best regards, Jet Pilot (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

My rollback

edit

Just a quick note, sorry for that, I didn't see that you had already rolled back the edit and I accidentally pressed rollback on it. —*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 22:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

A cup of tea for you!

edit
thank you sincerely for your anti-vandalism work :) x RozuRozu teacups 21:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@XRozuRozu: thank you! Jet Pilot 01:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for preventing this

edit

Hello Jet Pilot,

Thank you for reverting the vandalism made by Pooeyman9374 on several pages. I really appreciate you stopping it from happening on Wikipedia. I sent you thanks because of this. Hikingboii (talk) 01:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!

edit

Thanks so much for clearing up some of the racial slurs added by an especially charming anonymous user. I really appreciate your help! The next time you run into edits that are that terrible--the really ugly stuff, you could drop a level-4 warning on the user's talk page, then hunt down an admin to have them blocked immediately .We don't put up with that kind of nonsense: they don't have to get multiple warnings. Thanks again for all you do! Joyous! Noise! 03:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
Teahouse logo

Hello Jet Pilot! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Fair Use, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:09, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – January 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Administrator changes

added
readded Fathoms Below
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration


Administrators' newsletter – February 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2026).

Arbitration

  • Due to the result of a recent motion, a rough consensus of administrators at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard may impose an expanded topic ban on Israel, Israelis, Jews, Judaism, Palestine, Palestinians, Islam, and/or Arabs, if an editor's Arab-Israeli conflict topic ban is determined to be insufficient to prevent disruption. At least one diff per area expanded into should be cited.

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – March 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2026).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Ks0stm

Oversight changes

removed Ks0stm

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, remedy 9.1 of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been amended to limit TenPoundHammer to one XfD nomination or PROD per 24-hour period.
  • Following a motion, the Iskandar323 further POV pushing motion has been rescinded.
  • The Arbitration Committee has passed a housekeeping motion rescinding a number of outdated remedies and enforcement provisions across multiple legacy cases. In most instances, existing sanctions remain in force and continue to be appealable through the usual processes, while some case-specific remedies were amended or clarified.

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

edit

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous