Callanecc
 | Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries. |  |
| This is Callanecc's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 32 days  |
 | If you wish to discuss or inform me of a sensitive or private matter please read User:Callanecc/Emailnotice before emailing me. |
 |
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages is appreciated. |
Regarding topic ban of a user
editHi, it is regarding this edit by this user. Aren't they topic-banned from " South Asian social groups explicitly including castes". The edit they made is related to caste/community/ancestry not to mention unsourced. Please have a look. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Henry Earl
editHi Callanecc! hope you are doing well. I believe that Henry Earl, which you salted after a 2014 DRV, is now eligible for an article. During the AFD, the main argument for deletion was that an article about a man famous for being arrested over 1,000 times was an inherent BLP violation. Earl died in May 2024, so BLP is no longer an applicable argument. I also believe we have a clear GNG pass:
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
Per WP:NEWSWEEK, there is consensus that pre-2013 Newsweek articles are generally reliable. This one was published in 2004. |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
|
CNN is considered generally reliable |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
|
Lexington Herald-Leader is a highly-regarded newspaper of record for Lexington, Kentucky. |
Multiple paragraphs about Earl |
✔ Yes | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
Are you willing to undelete the article? I fully understand if you'd rather this be discussed at DRV given the lengthy history. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:57, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hi @HouseBlaster, sounds good to me so I've unsalted it. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:39, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Important
editREVDEL needed. New users. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 06:22, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Enćenćecasïdća I need some more information. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:24, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- All the names are still visible. Wondering if REVDEL is needed. Sorry to keep bothering you. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 06:41, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
- Got it. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:31, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase
editThe RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
