999real
A barnstar for you!
edit| The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| Thank you for adding that image! Really appreciate you :) MaskedSinger (talk) 20:08, 24 March 2025 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for September 10
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hal Totten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Braddock. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Benny Leonard
editHey, was just curious why the previous infobox photo of Leonard failed NFCC? GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- Never mind I see why now. What do you think of this photo of Leonard instead though? (Portrait du boxeur américain) Benny Leonard (Pacific) - btv1b53176192q.jpg GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 17:47, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- If you like it go ahead, I think it is not too..flattering.. Interestingly Bibliothèque nationale de France sources it to Agence Rol and dated 1927. but I found several copies of this photo stamped with New York, 1923.. , REAL 💬 ⬆ 19:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- Let’s just keep yours then. It would also save us the potential mistake of dating it wrong. GOAT Bones231012 (talk) 19:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
- If you like it go ahead, I think it is not too..flattering.. Interestingly Bibliothèque nationale de France sources it to Agence Rol and dated 1927. but I found several copies of this photo stamped with New York, 1923.. , REAL 💬 ⬆ 19:40, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
edit
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:34, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Courtesy note
editIn case you do not have pings turned on, I replied here. Carcharoth (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
What is the rule you follow, please.
editGreetings, 999real. You seem to be on a mission to delete fair use images. I got three notices of deletion before I could even ask you about them. Several questions. Your rationale is the image is from a commercial source (Associated Press or Getty Images) that is not discussed in the article. Where did you get this rule? What's so different about these sources compared to a fair use image obtained from any other commercial source? Where else would a fair use image come from if not a commercial source? Why are you citing this rule now, after many years? -SusanLesch (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Speedy deletion#F7 REAL 💬 ⬆ 04:57, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've never had the occasion before to look beyond WP:DEL-REASON. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Don't tag stuff on the basis of "was from Alamy". Alamy rehosts public domain content (and then watermarks it and claims to sell access). DS (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- I know that I fix the license if I found some reason for it to be public domain photos from PA or other sources outside US after 1931 usually are not PD REAL 💬 ⬆ 20:22, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Don't tag stuff on the basis of "was from Alamy". Alamy rehosts public domain content (and then watermarks it and claims to sell access). DS (talk) 20:14, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. I've never had the occasion before to look beyond WP:DEL-REASON. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Several images in this page should be CSD
editDavy Jones (Pirates of the Caribbean), what do you reckon? 🅶🅰🅼🅾🆆🅴🅱🅱🅴🅳 (talk) 07:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe the last 2 the others look fine REAL 💬 ⬆ 15:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:John Logie Baird, Apparatus.jpg
editHello 999real, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:John Logie Baird, Apparatus.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The image is from 1926 and may be out of copyright. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
editYou have recently edited a page related to post-1978 Iranian politics, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Edit warring on Tasnim News Agency
edit
Hi 999real! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore a version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Longhornsg (talk) 03:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
For future reference
edit"wrongly declined because someone thinks ""found on Alamy" is not a valid objection, because Alamy does a lot of copyfraud". This is a photo from PA Images who is a press/photo agency that just happens to use Alamy to sell their photos and F7b clearly applies"
"Found on Alamy" is still not a valid objection, because, as mentioned, they lie a lot.
"From PA Images", conversely, is a valid objection, and if you'd said that one from the beginning there'd've been no problem. DS (talk) 15:42, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Carson-suspect.jpg
editHello 999real. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Carson-suspect.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is an image from an automated surveillance camera at an ATM. As such it is Public Domain. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:39, 15 February 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:K Lion
edit
Hello, 999real. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:K Lion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Norm Clarke.png
editHello 999real, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Norm Clarke.png, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an AP photo - Source credits: JEFF SCHEID/LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:K Lion
edit
Hello, 999real. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "K Lion".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2026 (UTC)
March 2026
edit
Hello, I'm EggRoll97. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Clovermoss that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. EggRoll97 (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Declined speedies
edit- File:Damaged substation fence in Moore County.webp - reverted by you
- File:Mary Richardson Kennedy.jpg - reverted by you
- File:Ryan Preece Daytona flip.jpg - reverted by you
- File:William Moncrief.png
All of these have enough factors behind them that fair use can still be argued. Also slow down with mass nominating files in use - you may be right but being disruptive and reverting objections by people that are not the uploader/creator or declines by admins is disruptive. Sennecaster (Chat) 15:27, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
- For other admins watching this, there's some more discussion on my talk page that has relevant context. It doesn't look like they plan to slow down because they believe themselves to be right on the merits (which is problematic even if that's true due to the speed/scale). Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Gianna Bryant.jpg
editHello 999real. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Gianna Bryant.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is a claim that this image itself is the subject of sorucede commentary in the article. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Arch Wolfe.png
editHello 999real. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Arch Wolfe.png, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Associated Press photos distributed to newspapers between 1931 and 1963 did not have their copyrights renewed. There is a possibility that this may be PD. Sending to FFD instead. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:20, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Arnold Friberg.jpg
editHello 999real. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Arnold Friberg.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a clearcut AP photo. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:31, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: File:Doc Edgerton, 1963.jpg
editHello 999real. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Doc Edgerton, 1963.jpg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is amn AP photo and may possibly be PD. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:15, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
edit
You appear to be engaged in an edit war at Harry Adams (photographer). An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly revert each other's changes. Please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, use the talk page to discuss how the page can represent consensus among the editors involved. Here is some advice on how to do this. If discussions get stuck, you can request a third opinion, ask for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution.
Edit warring can result in being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts within 24 hours on one page. Undoing any other editor's work, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, is a revert. You can still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not violate the three-revert rule should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. TURKEYDICAE🦃 15:34, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
999real, why did you post a speedy deletion warning on my talk page for File:Baitullah Mehsud-AFP.jpg? I have no connection to this image and doubt I've ever seen it before. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- Twinkle did it the file history shows you were the original uploader 999REAL 💬 ⬆ 19:47, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use Twinkle. Wikimedia Commons says the uploader is "User:the Man in Question" not me. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- No I use twinkle and it sent the message https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Baitullah_Mehsud-AFP.jpg&action=history it shows you originally created the page on 28 August 2009 999REAL 💬 ⬆ 20:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- All right. I must have a wider range of interests than I'm aware of. Thanks. -SusanLesch (talk) 20:43, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- No I use twinkle and it sent the message https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Baitullah_Mehsud-AFP.jpg&action=history it shows you originally created the page on 28 August 2009 999REAL 💬 ⬆ 20:01, 20 July 2026 (UTC)
- I don't use Twinkle. Wikimedia Commons says the uploader is "User:the Man in Question" not me. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:59, 20 July 2026 (UTC)