Aaron Liu
is currently wikibonked and is operating at a lower edit level than usual. Hitting the wall is a temporary condition, and the user should return to normal edit levels in time.
You may know me from WP:RBV22 and WP:S++... which I have been neglecting. Stay tuned for my next misadventure into what the hell is he even doing
Committedidentity: 25ffde7391d383c04126fddbb696b3378eab780354262dad2946e18e988a8f649fb110c9a60d7ddc52242a280e481c997a206ac1feb7733f93a2bbcbeff639e9 is an SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
This page contains material that is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.
OMG, you actually tried to redefine it!!! (I just reverted that nonsense). The level of disruption here is out of control. —User:Born2cycle06:17, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
A person who refers to themself using the first-person plural, a.k.a. using the we/our pronouns. Employed by some pluralists. I did this for a while before I was banned from a Discord server I love and sometimes still do it. I am not a pluralist.
they (is)
Sometimes plural, sometimes not. When singular, you bet I'll conjugate them verbs with an s just like he/she, consistent conjugation conventions goddammit
ze/zim/zir
Due to popular pushback I have been adopting somehow-more-mainstream neopronouns instead. The casual ear believes this is just a German accent and the casual reader ignores conjugation; everyone's happy!
Anony
A way to humanize TA editors. When more than one, use references to numbers as if they were spelt out in a username.
hagiography
Trigger word. Oracle of discussions to catalyze into flames.
nomm'd
A telltale sign that one is a Wifione sockpuppet, despite the entire word being orthographically and grammatically correct. The people who say "nom'd" are the true freaks. Check their basements for scraps of bibuled babies.
Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.