Talk:Wanderstop/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BarntToust (talk · contribs) 01:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 13:33, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I will do this for WP:Good article review circles.

Comments

Comments will come soon. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:34, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

• The image has a valid fair use rational, so no problem with that.
• Could an image of someone who worked on the game, Davey Wreden be added in the background or development sections. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:35, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

  Added Wreden and C418 images BarntToust 14:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

• No stability issues, you are pretty much the only contributor.
• Definitely broad enough.
• Caption needs a period. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

   Done BarntToust 14:41, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I will check prose now.

• "tea shop with its owner Boro" -> "tea shop with its owner, Boro"
• "Burn out" should always be "burnout"
• "Planting seeds produce hybrids" -> "Planting seeds produces hybrids"
• "over if they wished." -> "over it if they wished."
• "video games whilst Rosenfeld" -> "video games while Rosenfeld"
• "music from C418's score featured" -> "music from C418's score was featured"
• "Wanderstop featured as part of the" -> "Wanderstop was featured as part of the"
• "though said it was aiming" -> "though he said it was aiming" History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:05, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Done BarntToust 15:13, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Maybe the reception section could be trimmed it is very long. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:21, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I've cut back on some prose there; let me know if I ought to trim some more. BarntToust 17:34, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Good enough. History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:37, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Article seems to have no neutrality issues. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:07, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I will spotcheck sources 12, 39, and 66. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:09, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

All are good, I will pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:16, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.