This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Latest comment: 4 months ago4 comments4 people in discussion
Wow, I stumbled upon this article and was really surprised: What a strange definition of a term! 'Religious toleration may signify "no more than forbearance..."'. I thought wikipedia articles should start with a proper neutral point of view definition. The very first line of the article is more like criticism and the use of words 'may signify' expresses uncertainity and "consequences" while there should be at least one sentence about the term as such. The first lines of the article should go (maybe) somewhere in the middle under 'criticism' or something like that. I'm not an experienced wikipedian, but I seriously think there is something very wrong with this article. Can some more experienced user take a look at it, please? 2A00:1028:96D5:9536:8941:7BF0:474C:A490 (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Is Wikipedia allowing propaganda and lying? Unbelievably wrongful article. This is absurdity.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Concerns were raised previously about AI-generated content in this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information for why this is tagged; however, note that fixing the issue requires more than just removing the superficial signs. Further notes: summer 2025 content addsGnomingstuff (talk) 04:17, 17 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
