 | Hawk Channel was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 5, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
GA review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hawk Channel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Bronson Fotiadis1 (talk · contribs) 21:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 00:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Quickfail per quickfail criteria 1, it is a long way from being cited properly or having broad coverage. There is nothing about the geological formation of the Channel, there are also 3 unsourced paragraphs. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:06, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.