Talk:Commonwealth Secretariat
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Commonwealth Secretariat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819010932/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/subhomepage/151087/ to http://www.thecommonwealth.org/subhomepage/151087/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080624014156/http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/34467/151305/marlborough_house_history/ to http://www.thecommonwealth.org/Internal/34467/151305/marlborough_house_history/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
I think this sentence is a little bit awkward: "At the same time, the United Kingdom succeeded in advocating the creation of the Secretariat's sister organisation, the Commonwealth Foundation was founded to foster non-governmental relations and the promotion of the Commonwealth Family network of civil societies". Shouldn't a "which" be inserted between "Foundation" and "was"?
Wiki Education assignment: International Organizations
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 18 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RedStrawberry123 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Student591, Darbybeddome.
— Assignment last updated by CMailhot (talk) 19:18, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Bold changes needed to this article
editI'm reluctant to make drastic changes to this article because of a conflict of interest. There's some very good content in this article but I see two major changes which could improve it.
- The entire Membership section makes statements that are true of the Commonwealth of Nations and not the Commonwealth Secretariat. "The Commonwealth Secretariat comprises 56 independent countries, 33 small states (states with a population of 1.5 million or less), and 2.7 billion citizens." This is not a true statement about the Secretariat but is true of the Commonwealth. "Any country can join the Commonwealth Secretariat." No: countries do not apply to become members of the Secretariat but members of the Commonwealth itself; this is what the cited sources say. Wikipedia articles should not contradict their own sources. The entire Membership section should go: the relevant information is already in the Commonwealth of Nations article. The Membership section presently includes subsections for Vision and Mission: Wikipedia articles are supposed to avoid mission statements, so losing these will be an improvement.
- Wikipedia articles are not supposed to have external links in body text. The Goals section presently has more than a dozen of these and is, in effect, a guide to the Secretariat's web site. This is not what the Wikipedia article is for. The Secretariat does a lot of activities which get media coverage in third-party sources. So there is scope for an Activities section which mentions these activities, replacing the Goals section. When writing about organisations, Wikipedia is supposed to focus on what the organisation has done, not what it aspires to do.
