The Russian Empire[e] was an empire that extended across northern Eurasia from 1721 until the proclamation of the Russian Republic in 1917, forming the final era of Tsarist Russia and the wider Russian monarchy. At its height in the late 19th century, it covered about 22,800,000 km2 (8,800,000 sq mi), roughly one-sixth of the world's landmass, making it the third-largest empire in history, behind only the British and Mongol empires.[3] The 1897 Russian census found a population of 126 million with considerable ethnic, linguistic, religious, and socioeconomic diversity.[8]
Russian Empire Российская империя | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1721–1917 | |||||||||
National flag
(1721–1858, 1896–1917) Coat of arms
(1883–1917) | |||||||||
| Motto: Съ Нами Богъ! "God is with us!" | |||||||||
| Anthem: Боже, Царя храни! ("God Save the Tsar!"; 1833–1917) | |||||||||
| Capital | Saint Petersburg[b] (1721–1728; 1732–1917) Moscow[c] (1728–1732) | ||||||||
| Largest city | Saint Petersburg | ||||||||
| Official languages | Russian | ||||||||
| Recognized languages | |||||||||
| Religion (1897) |
| ||||||||
| Demonym | Russian | ||||||||
| Government | Unitary absolute monarchy (1721–1906) Unitary parliamentary semi-constitutional monarchy (1906–1917) | ||||||||
| Emperor | |||||||||
• 1721–1725 (first) | Peter I | ||||||||
• 1894–1917 (last) | Nicholas II | ||||||||
| Head of government | |||||||||
• 1810–1812 (first) | Nikolai Rumyantsev[d] | ||||||||
• 1917 (last) | Nikolai Golitsyn | ||||||||
| Legislature | None (1721–1906) State Duma & State Council (1906–1917) | ||||||||
| State Council (1906–1917) | |||||||||
| State Duma (1906–1917) | |||||||||
| Historical era | |||||||||
| 10 September 1721 | |||||||||
• Proclaimed | 2 November 1721 | ||||||||
| 4 February 1722 | |||||||||
| 26 December 1825 | |||||||||
| 3 March 1861 | |||||||||
| 18 October 1867 | |||||||||
| Jan 1905 – Jul 1907 | |||||||||
| 30 October 1905 | |||||||||
| 6 May 1906 | |||||||||
| 8–16 March 1917 | |||||||||
| 14 September 1917 | |||||||||
| Area | |||||||||
| 1725[3][4] | 15,000,000 km2 (5,800,000 sq mi) | ||||||||
| 1895[3] | 22,800,000 km2 (8,800,000 sq mi) | ||||||||
| 1906[3] | 22,500,000 km2 (8,700,000 sq mi) | ||||||||
| Population | |||||||||
• 1897 | 125,640,021 | ||||||||
| 161,000,000 | |||||||||
| Currency | Russian ruble | ||||||||
| |||||||||
From the 10th to 17th century, the Russian lands were dominated by a noble class known as the boyars, above whom stood the grand prince and later the tsar, an absolute monarch. The groundwork of the empire was laid by Ivan III (r. 1462–1505), who greatly expanded his domain, established a centralized Russian national state, and secured independence from the Great Horde. His grandson, Ivan IV (r. 1533–1584), was the first Russian monarch to be crowned as tsar in 1547. Between 1550 and 1700, the Russian state grew by an average of 35,000 km2 (14,000 sq mi) per year.[9] Peter the Great transformed the tsardom into an empire, and fought wars that turned Russia into a major European power. He moved the capital from Moscow to the new model city of Saint Petersburg, and led a cultural revolution that introduced a modern, scientific, rationalist, and Western-oriented system. Catherine the Great (r. 1762–1796) presided over further Russian expansion by conquest, colonization, and diplomacy, while continuing Peter's policy of modernization. Alexander I (r. 1801–1825) helped defeat the militaristic ambitions of Napoleon and constituted the Holy Alliance, which aimed to restrain the rise of secularism and liberalism across Europe. Russia further expanded to the west, south, and east, strengthening it as a European power. Its victories in the Russo-Turkish wars were checked by defeat in the Crimean War (1853–1856), leading to a period of reform and conquests in Central Asia instead.[10] Alexander II (r. 1855–1881) initiated major reforms, most notably the 1861 emancipation of all 23 million serfs.[11] The period also saw major developments in literature, music, and the sciences.[12]
By the start of the 19th century, Russian territory extended from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the Black Sea in the south, and from the Baltic Sea in the west to Alaska in the east. It colonized Alaska between 1799 and 1867,[13] and in the early-to-mid 19th century briefly maintained outposts in California. The empire also expanded its control over the Caucasus, most of Central Asia, and parts of Northeast Asia. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the empire experienced industrial growth and railway construction, though the country remained largely agrarian.[14] Severe famines, such as that of 1891–1892, along with resistance to political reform, led to growing unrest and the rise of revolutionary movements.[15] Following the 1905 Revolution, Nicholas II (r. 1894–1917) authorized the creation of a national parliament, the State Duma, though ultimate power remained with him.[16]
Russia entered the First World War in 1914 on the side of the Allies. High casualties, military setbacks, and severe food and fuel shortages in the cities led to widespread discontent with the monarchy.[17] In 1917, mass unrest in Petrograd and army mutinies culminated in the February Revolution, which led to Nicholas II's abdication, the establishment of the Russian Provisional Government, and the proclamation of the Russian Republic. Political instability, continued involvement in the unpopular war, and economic disruption resulted in mass demonstrations against the government in July.[18] The republic was overthrown in the October Revolution by the Bolsheviks, who proclaimed the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and signed a treaty that ended Russia's involvement in the war, but who nevertheless were opposed by various factions known collectively as the Whites.[19][20] After emerging victorious in the Russian Civil War, the Bolsheviks established the Soviet Union across most of the Russian territory; Russia was one of four continental European empires to collapse as a result of World War I, along with Germany, Austria–Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire.[21]
History
editFrom the 10th to 17th century, the Russian lands were dominated by a noble class known as the boyars, above whom stood the grand prince and later the tsar, an absolute monarch. The foundations of a unified Russian state and eventually the Russian Empire were laid in the 15th century under Ivan III.[22][23] Moscow became the leading Russian principality and came to dominate the region known as Great Russia; by the early 16th century, the remaining Russian states were united with Moscow.[23][24] The subjects of the Muscovite ruler were overwhelmingly Great Russian in ethnicity and Orthodox in religion.[23] As Moscow was the only independent Orthodox power following the fall of the Byzantine Empire in 1453, its rulers had already taken symbolic steps toward becoming an empire by marrying into the Byzantine imperial dynasty, adopting the double-headed eagle as their symbol, and the title of tsar (caesar).[23]
During the reign of Ivan IV, the khanates of Kazan and Astrakhan were conquered by Russia in the mid-16th century, marking the beginning of the transformation from an almost mono-ethnic realm into a multi-ethnic empire.[25][26] The Russians began to expand into Siberia, initially in pursuit of the region's profitable furs.[25] Following the Time of Troubles in the early 17th century, the traditional alliance of autocratic monarchy, church, and aristocracy was seen as the only basis for preserving social order and Russian statehood, which legitimized the rule of the Romanov dynasty.[25]
Peter the Great (1682–1725)
edit

The foundations of the Russian Empire were laid during Peter I's reforms, which altered Russia's political and social structure,[27] and as a result of the Great Northern War which strengthened Russia's world standing.[28] Peter I (r. 1682–1725) played a major role in introducing the European state system into Russia. While Russia's vast lands had a population of 14 million, grain yields trailed behind those in the West.[29] Nearly the entire population was devoted to agriculture, with only a small percentage living in towns. The class of kholops, whose status was close to that of slaves, remained a major institution in Russia until 1723, when Peter converted household kholops into house serfs, thus counting them for poll taxation. Agricultural kholops had been converted into serfs in 1679. They were largely tied to the land, in a feudal sense, until the late 19th century.
Peter's first military efforts were directed against the Ottoman Empire. His attention then turned north; Russia lacked a secure northern seaport, except at Arkhangelsk on the White Sea, where the harbor was frozen for nine months a year. Access to the Baltic Sea was blocked by Sweden, whose territory enclosed it on three sides. Peter's ambitions for a "window to the sea" led him, in 1699, to make a secret alliance with Saxony, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, and Denmark-Norway against Sweden; they conducted the Great Northern War, which ended in 1721 when an exhausted Sweden asked for peace with Russia. On 2 November [O.S. 22 October] 1721, the day of the announcement of the Treaty of Nystad, the Governing Senate and Synod invested the tsar with the titles of Peter the Great,[30] Pater Patriae (father of the fatherland),[f] and Imperator of all Russia.[g][31][32] The adoption of the title of imperator by Peter I is seen as the beginning of "imperial" Russia.[h][35]
As a result of the war with Sweden, Peter acquired four provinces situated south and east of the Gulf of Finland, securing access to the Baltic Sea. In 1703, he founded the new capital, Saint Petersburg, on the Neva river delta to replace Moscow as the administrative and maritime center. The city was developed on a strict European grid pattern under architects such as Domenico Trezzini, utilizing Petrine Baroque and Italianate architecture to symbolize Russia's integration into Europe.[36]
Peter reorganized his government based on the latest political models, molding Russia into an absolutist state. The Military Regulations recognized the autocratic nature of the regime.[37] Peter replaced the old Boyar Duma (council of nobles) with a nine-member Senate, in effect a supreme council of state. The vestiges of the independence of the boyars were lost. The countryside was divided into new provinces and districts. Peter informed the Senate that its mission was to collect taxes, and tax revenues tripled over his reign. Peter continued and intensified his predecessors' requirement of state service from all nobles, in the Table of Ranks and equated the votchina with an estate. Russia's modern fleet was built by Peter, along with an army reformed in a European style and educational institutions (the Saint Petersburg Academy of Sciences). Civil lettering was adopted during Peter I's reign, and the first Russian newspaper, Vedomosti, was published. Peter I promoted science, particularly geography and geology, trade, and industry,[38] including shipbuilding, as well as the growth of the educational system. Peter laid the groundwork for state-sponsored primary and technical schooling, such as cipher and navigation schools, though formal education remained largely confined to the nobility and state servitors.[39]
As part of Peter's reorganization, he enacted a church reform. The Russian Orthodox Church was partially incorporated into the country's administrative structure, in effect making it a tool of the state. Peter abolished the patriarchate and replaced it with a collective body, the Most Holy Synod, which was led by a government official.[40]
The concept of the triune of the Russian people, composed of the Great Russians, the Little Russians, and the White Russians, was introduced under Peter I, and it was associated with the name of Archimandrite Zacharias Kopystensky (1621), the Archimandrite of the Kiev Pechersk Lavra and expanded upon in the writings of an associate of Peter I, Archbishop Professor Theophan Prokopovich. Several of Peter I's associates included Alexander Menshikov, Jacob Bruce, Mikhail Golitsyn and Anikita Repnin. During Peter's reign serf labor played a significant role in the growth of industry, reinforcing traditional socioeconomic structures. International trade increased as a result of Peter I's industrial reforms. However, imports of goods overtook exports, strengthening the role of foreigners in Russian trade, particularly the British.[41]
In 1722, Peter turned his aspirations toward increasing Russian influence in the Caucasus and the Caspian Sea at the expense of the weakened Safavid Persians. He made Astrakhan the base of military efforts against Persia, and waged the first full-scale war against them in 1722–23.[42] Peter the Great temporarily annexed areas of Iran to Russia, which after his death were returned in the 1732 Treaty of Resht and 1735 Treaty of Ganja as a deal to oppose the Ottomans.[43]
Peter died in 1725, leaving an unsettled succession. After the short reigns of his widow, Catherine I, and his grandson Peter II (who temporarily moved the court back to Moscow), the crown passed to Empress Anna in 1730. She slowed reforms and led a successful war against the Ottoman Empire. This resulted in a significant weakening of the Crimean Khanate, an Ottoman vassal and long-term Russian adversary. The next emperor, the infant Ivan VI, was deposed in 1741 and imprisoned for the rest of his life until being killed in 1764. The discontent over the dominant positions of Baltic Germans in Russian politics resulted in Peter I's daughter Elizabeth being put on the Russian throne in 1741. Elizabeth supported the arts, architecture, and the sciences (for example, the founding of Moscow University). But she did not carry out significant structural reforms. Her reign, which lasted nearly 20 years, is also known for Russia's involvement in the Seven Years' War, where it was successful militarily, but gained little politically.[44]
Catherine the Great (1762–1796)
edit


Catherine the Great was a German princess who married Peter III, the German heir to the Russian crown. After the death of Empress Elizabeth, Catherine came to power after she effected a coup d'état against her very unpopular husband. She contributed to the resurgence of the Russian nobility that began after the death of Peter the Great, confirming the abolition of compulsory state service (first decreed by Peter III in 1762) and granting nobles control of most state functions in the provinces. She also removed the Beard tax instituted by Peter the Great.[45]
Catherine extended Russian political control over the lands of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth, supporting the Targowica Confederation. However, the cost of these campaigns further burdened the already oppressive social system, under which serfs were required to spend almost all of their time laboring on their owners' land. A major Cossack and peasant uprising erupted in 1773, triggered by growing oppression of serfs and the erosion of Cossack autonomy. Led by the Cossack Yemelyan Pugachev, who claimed to be the deposed Emperor Peter III, the rebels captured substantial territory along the Volga and threatened Moscow before they were suppressed. Instead of imposing the traditional punishment of drawing and quartering, Catherine issued secret instructions that the executioners should execute death sentences quickly and with minimal suffering, as part of her effort to introduce compassion into the law.[46]
She furthered these efforts by ordering the public trial of Darya Nikolayevna Saltykova, a high-ranking noblewoman, on charges of torturing and murdering serfs. Although Catherine sought to project an enlightened image abroad, the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789 prompted her to suppress political dissent at home. Her son and successor, Paul I, further intensified censorship, banning foreign publications and French cultural influences.
In order to ensure the continued support of the nobility, which was essential to her reign, Catherine was obliged to strengthen their authority and power at the expense of the serfs and other lower classes. Nevertheless, Catherine realized that serfdom must eventually be ended, going so far in her Nakaz ("Instruction") to say that serfs were "just as good as we are" – a comment received with disgust by the nobility. Catherine advanced Russia's southern and western frontiers, successfully waging war against the Ottoman Empire for territory near the Black Sea, and incorporating territories of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth during the Partitions of Poland, alongside Austria and Prussia. As part of the Treaty of Georgievsk, signed with the Georgian Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti, Catherine launched the Persian expedition of 1796 after Iranian forces invaded eastern Georgia. Although Russian troops achieved swift victories, Catherine died later that year, and her successor Paul I promptly terminated the campaign and withdrew the forces.
Catherine's expansionist policy caused Russia to develop into a major European power,[47] as did the Enlightenment era and the Golden age in Russia. But after Catherine died in 1796, she was succeeded by her son, Paul. He brought Russia into a major coalition war against the revolutionary French Republic in 1798. Russian commander Field Marshal Suvorov led the Italian and Swiss expedition, inflicting a series of defeats on the French, in particular at the Battle of the Trebbia in 1799.
State budget
edit
Russia was in a continuous state of financial crisis. While revenue rose from 9 million rubles in 1724 to 40 million in 1794, expenses grew more rapidly, reaching 49 million in 1794. The budget allocated 46 percent to the military, 20 percent to government economic activities, 12 percent to administration, and nine percent for the Imperial Court in St. Petersburg. The deficit required borrowing, primarily from bankers in Amsterdam; five percent of the budget was allocated to debt payments. Paper money was issued to pay for expensive wars, thus causing inflation. As a result of its spending, Russia developed a large and well-equipped army, a very large and complex bureaucracy, and a court that rivaled those of Versailles and London. But the government was living far beyond its means, and 18th-century Russia became "poor and backward" after the middle of the century and remained "an overwhelmingly agricultural and illiterate country".[49]
Population
editMuch of Russia's expansion occurred in the 17th century, culminating in the first Russian colonization of the Pacific, the Russo-Polish War (1654–1667) which led to the incorporation of left-bank Ukraine, and the Russian conquest of Siberia. Poland was partitioned by its rivals in 1772–1815, most of its land and population taken under Russian rule. Most of the empire's growth in the 19th century came from gaining territory in central and eastern Asia south of Siberia.[50] By 1795, after the Partitions of Poland, Russia became the most populous state in Europe, ahead of France.
| Year | Population of Russia (millions) [51] |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1720 | 16 | includes new Baltic & Polish territories |
| 1795 | 38 | includes part of Poland |
| 1812 | 43 | includes Grand Duchy of Finland |
| 1858 | 74 | 10th revision census; includes Congress Poland, Bessarabia, and the Caucasus[52] |
| 1897 | 126 | Russian Empire census,[i] excludes Grand Duchy of Finland |
| 1914 | 164 | includes new Asian territories |
First half of the 19th century
edit
In 1801, over four years after Paul became the emperor of Russia, he was killed in Saint Michael's Castle in a coup. Paul was succeeded by his 23-year-old son, Alexander. Russia was in a state of war with the French Republic under the leadership of the Corsica-born First Consul Napoleon Bonaparte. After he became the emperor, Napoleon defeated Russia at Austerlitz in 1805, Eylau and Friedland in 1807. After Alexander was defeated in Friedland, he agreed to negotiate and sued for peace with France; the Treaties of Tilsit led to the Franco-Russian alliance against the Coalition and joined the Continental System.[53] By 1812, Russia had occupied many territories in Eastern Europe, holding some of Eastern Galicia from Austria and Bessarabia from the Ottoman Empire;[54] from Northern Europe, it had gained Finland from the war against a weakened Sweden; it also gained some territory in the Caucasus.
Following a dispute with Emperor Alexander I, in 1812, Napoleon launched an invasion of Russia. It was catastrophic for France, whose army was decimated during the Russian winter. Although Napoleon's Grande Armée reached Moscow, the Russians' scorched earth strategy prevented the invaders from living off the country. In the harsh and bitter winter, thousands of French troops were ambushed and killed by peasant guerrilla fighters.[55] Russian troops then pursued Napoleon's forces across Europe to Paris, cementing Russia's status as a premier arbiter of the post-war European order at the Congress of Vienna (1815), which confirmed Alexander as constitutional monarch of Congress Poland.[56] The "Holy Alliance" was proclaimed, linking the monarchist great powers of Austria, Prussia, and Russia.

Although the Russian Empire played a leading political role in the next century, thanks to its role in defeating Napoleonic France, its retention of serfdom precluded economic progress to any significant degree. As Western European economic growth accelerated during the Industrial Revolution, Russia began to lag ever farther behind, creating new weaknesses for the empire seeking to play a role as a great power. Russia's status as a great power concealed the inefficiency of its government, the isolation of its people, and its economic and social backwardness. Following the defeat of Napoleon, Alexander I had been ready to discuss constitutional reforms, but though a few were introduced, no major changes were attempted.[57]

The liberal Alexander I was replaced by his younger brother Nicholas I (1825–1855), who at the beginning of his reign was confronted with an uprising. The background of this revolt lay in the Napoleonic Wars, when a number of well-educated Russian officers travelled in Europe in the course of military campaigns, where their exposure to the liberalism of Western Europe encouraged them to seek change on their return to autocratic Russia. The result was the Decembrist revolt (December 1825), which was the work of a small circle of liberal nobles and army officers who wanted to install Nicholas' brother Constantine as a constitutional monarch. The revolt was easily crushed, but it caused Nicholas to turn away from the modernization program begun by Peter the Great and champion the doctrine of Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality.[58]
In order to repress further revolts, censorship was intensified, including the constant surveillance of schools and universities. Textbooks were strictly regulated by the government. Police spies were planted everywhere. Under Nicholas I, political subversives were exiled to Siberia, while hundreds of thousands of common criminals and state convicts were processed through the exile and katorga system over the course of the century.[59] The retaliation for the revolt made "December Fourteenth" a day long remembered by later revolutionary movements.[59]
The question of Russia's direction had been gaining attention ever since Peter the Great's program of modernization. Some favored imitating Western Europe while others were against this and called for a return to the traditions of the past. The latter path was advocated by Slavophiles, who held the "decadent" West in contempt. The Slavophiles were opponents of bureaucracy, who preferred the collectivism of the medieval Russian obshchina or mir over the individualism of the West.[60] More extreme social doctrines were elaborated by Russian radicals on the left, such as Alexander Herzen, Mikhail Bakunin, and Peter Kropotkin.
Foreign policy (1800–1864)
edit

Following the incorporation of the Eastern Georgian Kingdom into the empire in 1801, Russian forces clashed with Persia over control of the Caucasus during the Russo-Persian War (1804–1813), and also became involved in the Caucasian War against the Caucasian Imamate. At the conclusion of the war, Persia irrevocably ceded what is now Dagestan, eastern Georgia, and most of Azerbaijan to Russia, under the Treaty of Gulistan.[61] Russia attempted to expand to the southwest, at the expense of the Ottoman Empire, using recently acquired Georgia at its base for its Caucasus and Anatolian front. The late 1820s were successful years militarily. Despite losing almost all recently consolidated territories in the first year of the Russo-Persian War of 1826–1828, Russia managed to favorably bring an end to the war with the Treaty of Turkmenchay, including the formal acquisition of what are now Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iğdır Province.[62] In the 1828–1829 Russo-Turkish War, Russia invaded northeastern Anatolia and occupied the strategic Ottoman towns of Karin and Gümüşhane (Argiroupoli) and, posing as protector of the Greek Orthodox population, received extensive support from the region's Pontic Greeks. Following a brief occupation, the Russian imperial army withdrew back into Georgia.[63]
Russian emperors quelled two uprisings in their newly acquired Polish territories: the November Uprising in 1830 and the January Uprising in 1863. In 1863, the Russian autocracy had given the Polish artisans and gentry reason to rebel, by assailing national core values of language, religion, and culture.[64] France, Britain, and Austria tried to intervene in the crisis but were unable to do so. The Russian press and state propaganda used the Polish uprising to justify the need for unity in the empire.[65] The semi-autonomous polity of Congress Poland subsequently lost its distinctive political and judicial rights, with Russification being imposed on its schools and courts.[66] However, Russification policies in Poland, Finland and among the Germans in the Baltics largely failed and only strengthened political opposition.[65]
Second half of the 19th century
edit
In 1853–1856, Russia fought a coalition of Britain, France, Sardinia, and the Ottoman Empire in the Crimean War. The defeat, formalized by the 1856 Treaty of Paris, forced Russia to demilitarize the Black Sea and surrender parts of Bessarabia. The conflict shattered the perception of Russian military invincibility, exposing critical technological lags in steam-powered naval craft, rifled small arms, and railway infrastructure compared to Western industrial powers.[67]

When Emperor Alexander II ascended the throne in 1855, the desire for reform was widespread. Critics increasingly condemned serfdom as morally reprehensible and economically inefficient. In 1859, there were more than 23 million serfs in usually poor living conditions. Alexander II decided to abolish serfdom from above, with ample provision for the landowners, rather than wait for it to be abolished from below by revolution.[68]
The Emancipation Reform of 1861, which freed the serfs, was the single most important event in 19th-century Russian history, and the beginning of the end of the landed aristocracy's monopoly on power. The 1860s saw further socioeconomic reforms to clarify the position of the Russian government with regard to property rights.[69] Emancipation brought a supply of free labor to the cities, stimulating industry, while the middle class grew in number and influence. However, instead of receiving their lands as a gift, the freed peasants had to pay a special lifetime tax to the government, which in turn paid the landlords a generous price for the land that they had lost. In numerous cases the peasants ended up with relatively small amounts of the least productive land. All the property turned over to the peasants was owned collectively by the mir, the village community, which divided the land among the peasants and supervised the various holdings. Although serfdom was abolished, its abolition was achieved on terms unfavorable to peasants; thus, revolutionary tensions remained. Revolutionaries believed that the newly freed serfs were merely being sold into wage slavery in the onset of the industrial revolution, and that the urban bourgeoisie had effectively replaced the landowners.[70]

Seeking more territories, Russia obtained Priamurye (Outer Manchuria) from the weakened Manchu-led Qing China, which had been occupied fighting against the Taiping Rebellion. In 1858, the Treaty of Aigun ceded much of the Manchu homeland to the Russian Empire, and in 1860, the Treaty of Peking also ceded the modern Primorsky Krai, which provided the land for the establishment of the outpost of the future Vladivostok.[71] Meanwhile, Russia under Alexander II decided to sell what it saw as the indefensible Russian America to the United States for 11 million rubles (7.2 million dollars) in 1867 to Andrew Johnson's government in the Alaska Purchase.[72][73] Initially, many Americans considered this newly gained territory to be a wasteland and useless, and saw the government wasting money, whereupon the transaction was sometimes called "Seward's Folly" through the eponymous Secretary of State William H. Seward who brokered the deal,[74][75] but later, much gold and petroleum were discovered.[76]
In the late 1870s, Russia and the Ottoman Empire again clashed in the Balkans. From 1875 to 1877, the Balkan crisis intensified, with rebellions against Ottoman rule by various Slavic nationalities,[77] which the Ottoman Turks had dominated since the 15th century. This was seen as a political risk in Russia, which similarly suppressed its Muslims in Central Asia and Caucasia. Russian nationalist opinion became a major domestic factor with its support for liberating Balkan Christians from Ottoman rule and making Bulgaria and Serbia independent. In early 1877, Russia intervened on behalf of Serbian and Russian volunteer forces,[78] leading to the Russo-Turkish War (1877–78).[79] Within one year, Russian troops were nearing Constantinople and the Ottomans surrendered. Russia's nationalist diplomats and generals persuaded Alexander II to force the Ottomans to sign the Treaty of San Stefano in March 1878, creating an enlarged, independent Bulgaria that stretched into the southwestern Balkans.[78] When Britain threatened to declare war over the terms of the treaty, an exhausted Russia backed down. At the Congress of Berlin in July 1878, Russia agreed to the creation of a smaller Bulgaria and Eastern Rumelia, as a vassal state and an autonomous principality inside the Ottoman Empire, respectively.[80][81] As a result, Pan-Slavists were left with a legacy of bitterness against Austria-Hungary and Germany for failing to back Russia. Disappointment at the results of the war stimulated revolutionary tensions, and helped Serbia, Romania, and Montenegro gain independence from, and strengthen themselves against, the Ottomans.[82]
Another significant result of the war was the acquisition from the Ottomans of the provinces of Batumi, Ardahan, and Kars in Transcaucasia, which were transformed into the militarily administered regions of Batum Oblast and Kars Oblast. To replace Muslim refugees who had fled across the new frontier into Ottoman territory, the Russian authorities settled large numbers of Christians from ethnically diverse communities in Kars Oblast, particularly Georgians, Caucasus Greeks, and Armenians, each of whom hoped to achieve protection and advance their own regional ambitions.
- Russian troops taking Samarkand (1868)
- Russian troops entering Khiva in 1873
- Capturing of the redoubt at Plevna (1877)
- Battle of Shipka Pass (1877)
Alexander III
edit
In 1881, Alexander II was assassinated by the Narodnaya Volya, a Nihilist terrorist organization. The throne passed to Alexander III (1881–1894), a reactionary who revived the maxim of "Orthodoxy, Autocracy, and Nationality" of Nicholas I. A committed Slavophile, Alexander III believed that Russia could be saved from turmoil only by shutting itself off from the subversive influences of Western Europe. During his reign, Russia formed the Franco-Russian Alliance, to contain the growing power of Germany; completed the conquest of Central Asia; and demanded important territorial and commercial concessions from China. The emperor's most influential adviser was Konstantin Pobedonostsev, tutor to Alexander III and his son Nicholas, and procurator of the Holy Synod from 1880 to 1895. Pobedonostsev taught his imperial pupils to fear freedom of speech and the press, as well as dislike democracy, constitutions, and the parliamentary system. Under Pobedonostsev's ideological influence and the 1881 Exceptional Measures, the imperial security police (Okhrana) and gendarmerie were systematically expanded to suppress radical political organizations, subjecting suspects to administrative exile in Siberia while imperial authorities enforced aggressive Russification policies across non-Russian borderlands.[83]
Foreign policy (1864–1907)
editRussian forces steadily subjugated Central Asia, capturing Tashkent (1865), Samarkand (1868), and Khiva (1873), and establishing the governorate-general of Russian Turkestan.[84] This advance alarmed the British Empire over the security of the India frontier, initiating decades of regional rivalry and diplomatic maneuvering known as the Great Game.[85] That rivalry between the two empires has been considered to have included far-flung territories such as Outer Mongolia and Tibet. The maneuvering largely ended with the Anglo-Russian Convention of 1907.[86]
Expansion into the vast stretches of Siberia was slow and expensive, but finally became possible with the building of the Trans-Siberian Railway, 1890 to 1904. This opened up East Asia; and Russian interests focused on Mongolia, Manchuria, and Korea. China was too weak to resist, and was pulled increasingly into the Russian sphere. Russia obtained treaty ports such as Dalian/Port Arthur. In 1900, the Russian Empire invaded Manchuria as part of the Eight-Nation Alliance's intervention against the Boxer Rebellion. Japan strongly opposed Russian expansion, and defeated Russia in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905. Japan took over Korea, and Manchuria remained a contested area.[87]
Meanwhile, France, looking for allies against Germany after 1871, formed a military alliance in 1894, with large-scale loans to Russia, sales of arms, and warships, as well as diplomatic support. Following the Anglo-Russian Convention in 1907, which partitioned Persia into spheres of influence and recognized British dominance over Afghanistan, Britain, France, and Russia stood together in opposition to Germany and Austria-Hungary. The three would later comprise the Triple Entente alliance in the First World War.[88]
Early 20th century
edit
In 1894, Alexander III was succeeded by his son, Nicholas II, who was committed to retaining the autocracy that his father had left him. Nicholas II proved to be an ineffective ruler, and in the end his dynasty was overthrown by the Russian Revolution.[91] The Industrial Revolution began to show significant influence in Russia, but the country remained rural and poor.
Economic conditions steadily improved after 1890, thanks to new crops such as sugar beets, and new access to railway transportation. Total grain production increased, as well as exports, even with rising domestic demand from population growth. As a result, there was a slow improvement in the living standards of Russian peasants in the empire's last two decades before 1914. Recent research into the physical stature of Army recruits shows they were bigger and stronger. There were regional variations, with more poverty in the heavily populated central black earth region; and there were temporary downturns in 1891–93 and 1905–1908.[92]
On the political right, the reactionary elements of the aristocracy strongly favored the large landholders, who, however, were slowly selling their land to the peasants through the Peasants' Land Bank. The Octobrist party was a conservative force, with a base of landowners and businessmen. They accepted land reform but insisted that property owners be fully paid. They favored far-reaching reforms, and hoped the landlord class would fade away, while agreeing they should be paid for their land. Liberal elements among industrial capitalists and nobility, who believed in peaceful social reform and a constitutional monarchy, formed the Constitutional Democratic Party or Kadets.[93]
On the left, the Socialist Revolutionaries (SRs) and the Marxist Social Democrats (RSDLP) wanted to expropriate lands but were undecided on the question of individual or collective ownership.[94] The Socialist Revolutionaries also differed from the Social Democrats in that the SRs believed a revolution must rely on the peasantry, not the urban workers.[95]
The RSDLP's formative years were marked by ideological and strategic disputes culminating at its Second Congress in 1903, where the party split into two main factions: the Bolsheviks, led by Vladimir Lenin, who advocated a tightly organized vanguard of professional revolutionaries; and the Mensheviks, led by Julius Martov and others, who favored a more moderate, broad-based model. Despite repeated attempts at reunification, the rift between Bolsheviks and Mensheviks widened, resulting in a formal split in 1912. The February Revolution of 1917 saw some Mensheviks support cooperation with the Provisional Government, which the Bolsheviks opposed in favor of "all power to the soviets". After the Bolsheviks seized power in the October Revolution later that year, the RSDLP was effectively dissolved. [96]

Defeat in the Russo-Japanese War (1904–1905) was a major blow to the tsarist regime and further increased the potential for unrest. In January 1905, an incident known as "Bloody Sunday" occurred when Father Georgy Gapon led an enormous crowd to the Winter Palace in Saint Petersburg to present a petition to the emperor. When the procession reached the palace, soldiers opened fire on the crowd, killing hundreds. The Russian masses were so furious over the massacre that a general strike was declared, which demanded a democratic republic. This marked the beginning of the Revolution of 1905. Soviets (councils of workers) appeared in most cities to direct revolutionary activity. Russia was paralyzed, and the government was desperate.[97]
In October 1905, advised by Count Sergei Witte, Nicholas II reluctantly issued the October Manifesto, conceding basic civil liberties and creating an elected national parliament, the State Duma, without whose approval no law could take effect.[98] While moderate liberals formed the Octobrist party in support of the manifesto, radical socialists rejected it and attempted further armed uprisings in Moscow. With the suppression of urban rebellions by late 1905, the crown reaffirmed supreme autocratic prerogatives in the Russian Constitution of 1906, retaining exclusive control over foreign policy, military affairs, and emergency decrees under Article 87.[99]
War, revolution, and collapse
editOrigins and causes
editPrior to World War I, Russia was part of the Triple Entente alongside Britain and the French Republic, formed to counterbalance the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Anglo-Russian tensions over the Great Game in Central Asia subsided after the 1907 Anglo-Russian Convention, allowing both empires to align against German expansion.[100] Russia had already formed a defensive partnership through the Franco-Russian Alliance in 1894.[101]
Meanwhile, 19th-century alignments like the League of the Three Emperors dissolved. Relations with Berlin cooled,[102] while rivalry with Austria-Hungary over Balkan influence peaked during the Bosnian Crisis of 1908 and the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913.[103]
The June 1914 assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand triggered the July Crisis. Following Serbia's response to the Austro-Hungarian ultimatum, Vienna declared war on Serbia on 28 July 1914. As Serbia's ally and fellow Slavic power, Russia ordered general mobilization on 30 July to deter Austro-Hungarian aggression.[104]
Declaration of War
edit
As a result of Austria-Hungary's declaration of war on Serbia, Nicholas II ordered the mobilization of 4.9 million soldiers. Germany, Austria-Hungary's ally, saw the call to arms as a threat,[105] and declared war on 1 August 1914, and the Austro-Hungarian Empire followed suit by declaring war on Russia on 6 August.[106] The Russians were imbued with patriotic earnestness and Germanophobic sentiment, including the name of the capital, Saint Petersburg, which sounded too German and was renamed Petrograd.[107]
The Russian entry into the First World War was followed by France.[108] The German General Staff had devised the Schlieffen Plan, which first eliminated France via nonaligned Belgium before moving east to attack Russia, whose massive army was much slower to mobilize.[109]
Theaters of operations
editGerman front
edit
By August 1914, Russia had invaded with unexpected speed the German province of East Prussia, ending with a humiliating defeat at the Battle of Tannenberg, largely due to unencrypted radio transmissions,[110] causing the destruction of the entire second army. Russia suffered a massive defeat at the Masurian Lakes twice, the first ending with a hundred thousand casualties;[111] and the second suffering 200,000.[112] By October, the German Ninth Army was near Warsaw, and the newly-formed Tenth Army had retreated from the frontier in East Prussia. Grand Duke Nicholas, the Russian commander-in-chief, now had the order to invade Silesia with his Fifth, Fourth, and Ninth armies.[113] The Ninth Army, led by Mackensen, retreated from the frontline in Galicia and concentrated between the cities of Posen and Thorn. The advance took place on 11 November against the main army's right flank and rear; the First and Second armies were severely mauled, and the Second army was nearly surrounded in Łódź on 17 November.
Exhausted Russian troops began to withdraw from Russian-held Poland, allowing the Germans to capture many cities, including the kingdom's capital Warsaw on 5 August 1915.[114] In the same month, the emperor dismissed Grand Duke Nicholas and took personal command;[115] this was a turning point for the Russian army and the beginning of the worst disaster.[116] Russia lost the entire territory of Poland and Lithuania,[117] part of the Baltic states and Grodno, and partly of Volhynia and Podolia in Ukraine; thereafter the front with Germany was stable until 1917.
Austrian front
editAustria-Hungary went to war with Russia on 6 August. The Russians started to invade Galicia, held by Austrian Cisleithania on 20 August, and annihilated the Austro-Hungarian Army at Lemberg, leading to the occupation of Galicia.[118] While Przemyśl Fortress was besieged, the first attempt to capture the fortress failed, but the second attempt succeeded in March 1915.[119] On 2 May, Russian lines were broken through by joint Austro-German forces, retreating from the Gorlice to Tarnów line and losing Przemyśl.
On 4 June 1916, General Aleksei Brusilov carried out an offensive by targeting Kovel. His offensive was a great success, taking 76,000 prisoners from the main attack and 1,500 from the Austrian bridgehead. But the offensive was halted by inadequate ammunition and a lack of supplies.[120] The eponymous offensive was the most successful allied strike of World War I,[121] practically destroying the Austro-Hungarian army as an independent force, but suffering heavy casualties (approximately one million men) prevented Russian forces from launching further major attacks.
Turkish front
editOn 29 October 1914, a prelude to the Russo-Turkish front, the Turkish fleet, with German support, began to raid Russian coastal cities, including Odessa, Sevastopol, Novorossiysk, Feodosia, Kerch, and Yalta.[122] This led Russia to declare war on the Ottoman Empire on 2 November.[123] In December 1914, Russia obtained success at Sarikamish, where the Russian General Nikolai Yudenich routed Enver Pasha.[124] Yudenich captured Köprüköy in January 1916 and captured Erzurum about one month later in February.[125]
The Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet was on the defensive in 1914, but this changed in the spring of 1915, when the high command ordered the fleet to attack the Turkish coast to assist the Western Entente landings in Gallipoli.[126] The Russian naval raids failed to make any difference for the Gallipoli campaign, but they were very successful in disrupting coal shipments to Constantinople from other parts of Anatolia. The coal shortage caused by Russian submarine and destroyer attacks threatened the Ottoman Empire's continued participation in the war.[127]
Problems in the empire
edit
By mid-1915, the prolonged war produced profound domestic dislocation: refugee crises following the Great Retreat, acute rail transport bottlenecks, mounting inflation, and severe shortages of food and fuel in major urban centers.[128] Industrial strikes escalated while peasant grain deliveries dropped. Nicholas II's decision in August 1915 to assume direct supreme military command tied the prestige of the monarchy directly to battlefield reverses, while leaving political governance in Petrograd under Empress Alexandra and the controversial influence of Grigori Rasputin. Rasputin's murder in December 1916 by conservative aristocrats failed to halt the erosion of the regime's authority.[129]
End of imperial rule
editOn 8 March 1917, International Women's Day, a strike was organized at a factory in the capital, after which thousands of people took to the streets in Petrograd to protest food shortages. A day later, protesters rose to two hundred thousand, demanding that Russia withdraw from the war and the emperor be deposed. Eighty thousand Russian troops, half of the deployed army sent to restore order, had gone on strike and refused the senior officers' orders.[130] Any imperial symbols were destroyed and burned. The capital was out of control and gripped by protest and strife.[131]
In the city of Pskov, 262 km (163 mi) southwest from the capital, many generals and politicians advised the Emperor to abdicate in favor of the Tsarevich; Nicholas accepted, but he bequeathed the throne to Grand Duke Michael as his legitimate successor.[132] Michael stated that he would only accept the throne if it would be offered by a constituent assembly.[133] The form of political organization that emerged has been described as "dual power", with the Russian Provisional Government co-existing with the soviets.[133] The constitutional framework of Russia remained in limbo until Alexander Kerensky finally confirmed Russia's status as a republic on 14 September [O.S. 1 September].[133] In July 1918, following the October Revolution, the Romanov family was murdered by the Bolsheviks in Yekaterinburg, marking the end of the dynasty as well as more than a millennium of Russian monarchy.[134]
Territory
edit

By the end of the 19th century the area of the empire reached roughly 22,800,000 square kilometers (8,800,000 sq mi) (with land area often estimated at 22,400,000 km2 (8,600,000 sq mi)), or almost one-sixth of the Earth's landmass; its only rival in size at the time was the British Empire. The majority of the population lived in European Russia. More than 100 different ethnic groups lived in the Russian Empire, with ethnic Russians composing about 45% of the population.[135]
Geography
editThe administrative boundaries of European Russia, excluding Finland and Congress Poland, coincided approximately with the East European Plain. To the north lay the Arctic Ocean, including Novaya Zemlya, Kolguyev, and Vaygach Island. To the east, European Russia was separated from Siberia and the Central Asian steppes by the Ural Mountains, the Ural River, and the Caspian Sea. To the south, European Russia was bounded by the Black Sea and the Caucasus Mountains, separated from the northern plains by the Kuma–Manych Depression. The western border ran from the Varangerfjord through the Baltic coast to the mouth of the Danube, bordering Prussia, Austrian Galicia, and Romania.[136]
An important feature of the empire was its few free outlets to the open sea outside the icebound shores of the Arctic Ocean. The Gulfs of Bothnia and Finland were surrounded largely by Finnish territory, and it was at the head of the Gulf of Finland that the capital was established at the mouth of the Neva river. The Gulf of Riga and the Baltic coast were inhabited predominantly by Baltic and Finnic peoples, as well as Germans. To the south, the Black Sea was an inland sea whose only outlet, the Bosphorus, was held by the Ottoman Empire, while the landlocked Caspian Sea served mainly as a link between Russia and its Asian territories rather than a route for foreign trade.[137]
Territorial development
edit
From 1860 to 1905, the Russian Empire occupied all territories of the present-day Russian Federation, with the exception of the present-day Kaliningrad Oblast, Kuril Islands and Tuva. In 1905 Russia lost southern Sakhalin to Japan, but gained Tuva as a protectorate in 1914. Prior to 1917 the Russian Empire included most of Dnieper Ukraine, Belarus (part of former Grand Duchy of Lithuania), Bessarabia, the Grand Duchy of Finland, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, the Central Asian states of Russian Turkestan, most of the Baltic Governorates, a significant part of Poland, and the former Ottoman provinces of Ardahan, Artvin, Iğdır, Kars, and the northeastern part of Erzurum Province.
In his 1864 circular, Foreign Minister Alexander Gorchakov justified Russian expansion into Central Asia by comparing it to the westward expansion of the United States and European conquests in Asia and North Africa, arguing that imperial powers were inevitably compelled to secure volatile frontier regions against nomadic raids.[138]
Between 1799 and 1867, the Russian-American Company administered Alaska as a colony. The company also established settlements in Hawaii, including Fort Elizabeth (1817), and as far south in North America as Fort Ross Colony (established in 1812) in Sonoma County, California just north of San Francisco. Both Fort Ross and the Russian River in California got their names from Russian settlers, who had staked claims in a region claimed until 1821 by the Spanish as part of New Spain.
Following the Swedish defeat in the Finnish War of 1808–1809 and the signing of the Treaty of Fredrikshamn on 17 September 1809, the eastern half of Sweden, the area that then became Finland, was incorporated into the Russian Empire as an autonomous grand duchy. The emperor eventually ended up ruling Finland as a semi-constitutional monarch through the Governor-General of Finland and a native Senate appointed by him. The emperor never explicitly recognized Finland as a constitutional state in its own right, although his Finnish subjects came to consider the grand duchy as such.

In the aftermath of the Russo-Turkish War (1806–1812), and the ensuing Treaty of Bucharest (1812), the eastern parts of the Principality of Moldavia, an Ottoman vassal state, along with some areas formerly under direct Ottoman rule, came under the rule of the empire. This area (Bessarabia) was among the Russian Empire's last territorial acquisitions in Europe. At the Congress of Vienna (1815), Russia gained sovereignty over so-called Congress Poland, which on paper was an autonomous kingdom in personal union with Russia. However, this autonomy was eroded after the November Uprising in 1831, and was finally abolished in 1867.
Saint Petersburg gradually extended and consolidated its control over the Caucasus in the course of the 19th century, at the expense of Persia through the Russo-Persian War (1804–13) and Russo-Persian War (1826–28) and the respectively ensuing treaties of Gulistan and Turkmenchay,[139] as well as through the Caucasian War (1817–1864).
The Russian Empire expanded its influence and possessions in Central Asia, especially in the later 19th century, conquering much of Russian Turkestan in 1865 and continuing to add territory as late as 1885.
Newly discovered Arctic islands became part of the Russian Empire: the New Siberian Islands from the early 18th century; Severnaya Zemlya ("Emperor Nicholas II Land") first mapped and claimed as late as 1913.
During World War I, Russia briefly occupied a small part of East Prussia, then a part of Germany; a significant portion of Austrian Galicia; and significant portions of Ottoman Armenia. While the modern Russian Federation currently controls the Kaliningrad Oblast, which comprised the northern part of East Prussia, this differs from the area captured by the empire in 1914, though there was some overlap: Gusev (Gumbinnen in German) was the site of the initial Russian victory.
Imperial territories
edit
According to the 1st article of the Organic Law, the Russian Empire was one indivisible state. In addition, the 26th article stated that "With the Imperial Russian throne are indivisible the Kingdom of Poland and Grand Principality of Finland". Relations with the Grand Principality of Finland were also regulated by the 2nd article, "The Grand Principality of Finland, constituted an indivisible part of the Russian state, in its internal affairs governed by special regulations at the base of special laws", and by the law of 10 June 1910.
Between 1799 and 1867, the empire formally controlled Russian America. With the exception of this territory – modern-day Alaska – the Russian Empire was a contiguous mass of land spanning Europe and Asia. In this it differed from contemporary colonial-style empires. The result of this was that, while the British and French empires declined in the 20th century, a large portion of the Russian Empire's territory remained together, first within the Soviet Union, and after 1991 in the smaller Russian Federation.
Furthermore, the empire held leaseholds and concessions in Qing China, notably the Kwantung Leased Territory (including the naval base at Port Arthur) and the Chinese Eastern Railway zone across Manchuria, as well as the Russian concession of Tianjin.[140]
In 1815, Georg Anton Schäffer, an agent of the Russian-American Company, reached Kauai and negotiated a protectorate agreement with local ruler Kaumualii, but Emperor Alexander I declined ratification to avoid diplomatic conflict with Great Britain and the United States.[141]
In 1889, adventurer Nikolay Ivanovitch Achinov led an unauthorized expedition to establish an outpost named New Moscow at Sagallo on the Gulf of Tadjoura (modern Djibouti). Because the territory was claimed by the French Somaliland protectorate, French naval gunboats bombarded the settlement after Achinov refused to surrender; the survivors were arrested and deported to Russia, where the tsarist government disavowed the venture.[142]
Government and administration
editFrom its initial proclamation in 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1905, the Russian Empire was led by an emperor (also referred to as tsar), who ruled as an absolute monarch.[143] The adoption of the Russian Constitution of 1906 marked an important step toward constitutionalism in Russia: while the emperor retained the legal title and status of autocrat, his legislative monopoly was ended as laws now required the approval of the elected parliament.[144][145] Nevertheless, the form of government is best described as a semi-constitutional monarchy.[143][144][146] The emperor retained ultimate authority, including an absolute veto over legislation, the right to promulgate exceptional decrees, control of foreign affairs, and special prerogatives in defense legislation.[144] The Almanach de Gotha, which had previously described Russia as "a hereditary monarchy", thereafter referred to it as "a constitutional monarchy under an autocratic tsar".[144]
Most Russian leaders adhered to a kind of conservatism or traditionalism, albeit accommodating occasional reform. This conservatism was premised on the anti-rationalism of intellectuals, religiosity of the Russian Orthodox Church, traditionalism rooted in the landed estates worked by serfs, and militarism of the army officer corps.[147] Official imperial ideology generally rejected Western European rationalism in favor of romantic nationalism and religious orthodoxy, framing the autocratic monarchy as the only natural political order for Russian society.[148] A conservative notion of modernization based on the incorporation of modern technology to serve the established system replaced the liberal notion of "progress". The promise of modernization in the service of autocracy frightened socialist intellectual Alexander Herzen, who warned of a Russia governed by "Genghis Khan with a telegraph".[149]
Emperor
edit
Peter the Great changed his title from tsar to emperor in order to secure Russia's position in the European states system.[150] While later rulers did not discard the new title, the Russian monarch was commonly known as the tsar or tsaritsa until the imperial system was abolished following the February Revolution of 1917. Prior to the issuance of the October Manifesto, the emperor ruled as an absolute monarch, subject to only two limitations on his authority, both of which were intended to protect the existing system: the emperor and his consort must both belong to the Russian Orthodox Church, and he must obey the Pauline Laws of succession established by Paul I. Beyond this, the power of the Russian autocrat was virtually limitless.
On 17 October 1905, the situation changed: the ruler voluntarily limited his legislative power by decreeing that no measure was to become law without the consent of the Imperial Duma, a freely elected national assembly established by the Organic Law issued on 28 April 1906. However, he retained the right to disband the newly established Duma, and he exercised this right more than once. He also retained an absolute veto over all legislation, and only he could initiate any changes to the Organic Law itself. His ministers were responsible solely to him, and not to the Duma or any other authority, which could question but not remove them. Thus, while the emperor's personal powers were limited in scope after 28 April 1906, they remained formidable.
Imperial Council
edit

Under Russia's revised Fundamental Law of 20 February 1906, the State Council was associated with the Duma as a legislative upper house; from this time the legislative power was exercised normally by the emperor only in concert with the two chambers.[151] The Council of the Empire, or Imperial Council, as reconstituted for this purpose, consisted of 196 members, of whom 98 were nominated by the emperor, while 98 were elective. The ministers, also nominated, were ex officio members. Of the elected members, 3 were returned by the "black" clergy (the monks), 3 by the "white" clergy (secular), 18 by the corporations of nobles, 6 by the academy of sciences and the universities, 6 by the chambers of commerce, 6 by the industrial councils, 34 by local governmental zemstvos, 16 by local governments having no zemstvos, and 6 by Poland. As a legislative body the powers of the council were coordinate with those of the Duma; in practice, however, it seldom if ever initiated legislation.
State Duma
editThe Imperial Duma or State Duma (Gosudarstvennaya Duma), which formed the lower house of the Russian parliament, consisted (since the electoral law of 16 June [O.S. 3 June] 1907) of 442 members, elected by an exceedingly complicated franchise.[152] The membership was manipulated to secure an overwhelming majority of wealthy landholders and ethnic Russian representatives at the expense of subject nationalities. Each province of the empire, except Central Asia, returned a set number of deputies, alongside representatives from several major cities. Members were chosen through electoral colleges, which were elected by three broad curiae: landed proprietors, urban property owners, and peasants.[153]
Voting in the electoral colleges was conducted by secret ballot, with a simple majority deciding each seat. Because conservative elements dominated the colleges, progressive and socialist parties had limited representation. The few radical delegates largely owed their seats to direct representation granted to the empire's seven largest cities—Saint Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev, Odessa, Riga, Warsaw, and Łódź—though even there the electorate was stratified by property qualifications.[154]
Council of Ministers
editIn 1905, the Council of Ministers (Sovet Ministrov) was created, under a minister president, the first appearance of a prime minister in Russia. This council consisted of all the ministers and of the heads of other principal departments. The ministries were as follows:
- Ministry of the Imperial Court
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs;
- Ministry of War;
- Ministry of the Navy;
- Ministry of Finance;
- Ministry of Commerce and Industry (created in 1905);
- Ministry of Internal Affairs (including police, health, censorship and press, posts and telegraphs, foreign religions, statistics);
- Ministry of Agriculture and State Assets;
- Ministry of Ways of Communications;
- Ministry of Justice;
- Ministry of National Education.
Most Holy Synod
edit
The Most Holy Synod, established in 1721, was the supreme organ of government of the Russian Orthodox Church. It was presided over by a lay procurator, representing the emperor, and consisted of the three metropolitans of Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Kiev, the Archbishop of Georgia, and a number of bishops sitting in rotation.
Senate
editThe Governing Senate (Pravitelstvuyushchi Senat), originally established during the government reform of Peter the Great, consisted of members nominated by the emperor. Its wide variety of functions were carried out by the different departments into which it was divided. It was the supreme court of cassation; an audit office; a high court of justice for all political offences; and one of its departments fulfilled the functions of a heralds' college. It also had supreme jurisdiction in all disputes arising out of the administration of the empire, notably in differences between representatives of the central power and the elected organs of local self-government. Lastly, it promulgated new laws, a function which theoretically gave it a power akin to that of the Supreme Court of the United States, of rejecting measures not in accordance with fundamental laws.
Administrative divisions
edit

Russia was a unitary state.[155][156] As of 1914, Russia was divided into 81 governorates (gubernii), 20 oblasts, and 1 okrug. Vassals and protectorates of the Russian Empire included the Emirate of Bukhara, the Khanate of Khiva, and, after 1914, Tuva (Uriankhai). Of these, 11 governorates, 17 oblasts, and 1 okrug (Sakhalin) belonged to Asian Russia. Of the rest, 8 governorates were in Finland and 10 in Congress Poland. European Russia thus embraced 59 governorates and 1 oblast (that of the Don). The Don Host Oblast was under the direct jurisdiction of the ministry of war; the rest each had a governor and deputy-governor, the latter presiding over the administrative council. In addition, there were governors-general, generally placed over several governorates and armed with more extensive powers, usually including the command of the troops within the limits of their jurisdiction. In 1906, there were governors-general in Finland, Warsaw, Vilna, Kiev, Moscow, and Riga. The larger cities (Saint Petersburg, Moscow, Odessa, Sevastopol, Kerch, Nikolayev, and Rostov) had administrative systems of their own, independent of the governorates; in these the chief of police acted as governor.
Judicial system
editThe judicial system of the Russian Empire was established by the statute of 20 November 1864 of Alexander II. This system – based partly on English and French law – was predicated on the separation of judicial and administrative functions, the independence of the judges and courts, public trials and oral procedure, and the equality of all classes before the law. Moreover, a democratic element was introduced by the adoption of the jury system and the election of judges. This system was disliked by the bureaucracy, due to its putting the administration of justice outside of the executive sphere. During the late reign of Alexander II and under Alexander III, judicial independence was progressively curtailed, though several of these restrictions were rolled back by the Third Duma following the 1905 Revolution.[j]
The system established by the law of 1864 had two wholly separate tribunals, each having their own courts of appeal and coming in contact with each other only in the Senate, which acted as the supreme court of cassation. The first tribunal, based on the English model, were the courts of the elected justices of the peace, with jurisdiction over petty causes, whether civil or criminal; the second, based on the French model, were the ordinary tribunals of nominated judges, sitting with or without a jury to hear important cases.
Local administration
editAlongside the local organs of the central government in Russia, there were three classes of local elected bodies charged with administrative functions:
- the peasant assemblies in the mirs and the volosts;
- the zemstvos in the 34 governorates of Russia;
- the municipal dumas.
Municipal dumas
edit
Since 1870, the municipalities in European Russia had institutions like those of the zemstvos. All owners of houses, tax-paying merchants, artisans, and workmen were enrolled on lists, in descending order according to their assessed wealth. The total valuation was then divided into three equal parts, representing three groups of electors very unequal in number, each of which would elect an equal number of delegates to the municipal duma. The executive was in the hands of an elected mayor and an uprava, which consisted of several members elected by the municipal duma. Under Alexander III, however, through bylaws promulgated in 1892 and 1894, the municipal dumas were subordinated to the governors in the same way as the zemstvos. In 1894, municipal institutions, with still more restricted powers, were granted to several towns in Siberia, and in 1895 to some in the Caucasus.
Baltic provinces
editThe formerly Swedish-controlled Baltic provinces of Livonia and Estonia, along with the Duchy of Courland, were incorporated into the empire following the Great Northern War and the Third Partition of Poland. Under the 1721 Treaty of Nystad, the Baltic German nobility retained wide autonomy, religious freedom for Lutheranism, and German as the administrative language.[157]
In the late 1880s, the imperial government enacted policies transferring judicial and police administration from local Baltic German manorial courts to central crown officials. This was accompanied by state-directed Russification, mandating the Russian language in provincial administration, secondary schools, and the Imperial University of Dorpat, which was renamed Iuryev in 1893.[158]
Economy
edit
Before the abolition of serfdom in 1861, Russia's economy mainly depended on agriculture.[159] By the census of 1897, 95% of the Russian population lived in the countryside.[160] Nicholas I attempted to modernize his country, and have it not been so dependent on a single economic sector.[161] During the reign of Alexander III, many reforms occurred. The Peasants' Land Bank was founded in 1883 to provide loans for Russian peasants, both as individuals and in communes. The Nobles' Land Bank, in 1885, made loans at nominal interest rates to the landed nobility. The poll tax was abolished in 1886.[162]
When Ivan Vyshnegradsky was appointed as the new minister of finance in 1886, he increased the pressure on peasants by increasing taxes on land and prescribing how they harvested grain. These policies led to the severe Russian famine of 1891–1892, with four hundred thousand perishing from starvation. Vyshnegradsky was succeeded by Count Sergei Witte in 1892. Witte began by raising revenues through a monopoly on alcohol, which brought in 300 million rubles in 1894. These reforms returned the peasants to essentially being serfs again.[163] In 1900, a wealthy peasant class (kulaks) had emerged, representing less than 20% of the population.[164] An income tax was introduced in 1916. Historical national accounts indicate that between 1885 and 1913, real national income grew at an average rate of roughly 3.3% annually, keeping pace with contemporaneous Western industrial growth, though rapid demographic growth kept per capita output at roughly one-third to one-half of Western European levels.[165]
Agriculture
editThe agrarian economy rested on large estates worked by serfs under two primary obligations: barshchina (compulsory labor dues) and obrok (quitrent in cash or kind, which allowed peasants to take outside work).[166] The legal foundations of serfdom had been formalized in the Sobornoye Ulozheniye of 1649 under Tsar Alexis.
From 1891 to 1892, peasants were faced with new policies carried out by Ivan Vyshnegradsky, causing a famine and disease that took the lives of four hundred thousand people,[167][168] especially in the Volga region, eliciting the greatest decline in grain production.[169]
Mining and heavy industry
edit

| Ural Region | Southern Region | Caucasus | Siberia | Kingdom of Poland | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold | 21% | – | – | 88.2% | – |
| Platinum | 100% | – | – | – | – |
| Silver | 36% | – | 24.3% | 29.3% | – |
| Lead | 5.8% | – | 92% | – | 0.9% |
| Zinc | – | – | 25.2% | – | 74.8% |
| Copper | 54.9% | – | 30.2% | 14.9% | – |
| Pig Iron | 19.4% | 67.7% | – | – | 9.3% |
| Iron and Steel | 17.3% | 36.2% | – | – | 10.8% |
| Manganese | 0.3% | 29.2% | 70.3% | – | – |
| Coal | 3.4% | 67.3% | – | 5.8% | 22.3% |
| Petroleum | – | – | 96% | – | – |
Infrastructure
editRail
edit
After 1860, the expansion of Russian rail had far-reaching effects on the economy, culture, and ordinary life of Russia. The central authorities and the imperial elite made most of the key decisions, but local elites made demands for rail linkages. Local nobles, merchants, and entrepreneurs imagined a future of promoting their regional interests, from "locality" to "empire". Often, they had to compete with other cities. By envisioning their own role in a rail network they came to understand how important they were to the empire's economy.[170]
During the 1880s, the Russian army built two major rail lines in Central Asia. The Transcaucasus Railway connected the city of Batum on the Black Sea and the oil center of Baku on the Caspian Sea. The Trans-Caspian Railway began at Krasnovodsk on the Caspian Sea and reached Bukhara, Samarkand, and Tashkent. Both lines served the commercial and strategic needs of the empire and facilitated migration.[171]
Religion
edit

The Russian Empire's state religion was Orthodox Christianity.[172][173] The emperor was not allowed to "profess any faith other than the Orthodox" (Article 62 of the 1906 Fundamental Laws) and was deemed "the Supreme Defender and Guardian of the dogmas of the predominant Faith and is the Keeper of the purity of the Faith and all good order within the Holy Church" (Article 64 ex supra). Although he made and annulled all senior ecclesiastical appointments, he did not settle questions of dogma or church teaching. The principal ecclesiastical authority of the Russian Church—which extended its jurisdiction over the entire territory of the empire, including the ex-Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti—was the Most Holy Synod, the civilian Over Procurator of the Holy Synod being one of the council of ministers with wide de facto powers in ecclesiastical matters.
The ecclesiastical heads of the national Russian Orthodox Church consisted of three metropolitans (Saint Petersburg, Moscow, Kiev), fourteen archbishops and fifty bishops, all drawn from the ranks of the monastic (celibate) clergy.
Religious policy
editAll non-Orthodox religions were formally forbidden from proselytizing within the empire.[174] In a policy influenced by Catherine II but solidified in the 19th century, Tsarist Russia exhibited increasing "confessionalization", pursuing top-down reorganization of the empire's faiths,[174] also referred to as the "confessional state".[175] The tsarist administration sought to arrange "orthodoxies" within Islam, Buddhism, and the Protestant faiths, which was performed by creating spiritual assemblies (in the case of Islam, Judaism, and Lutheranism), banning and declaring bishoprics (in the case of Roman Catholicism), and arbitrating doctrinal disputes.[174] When the state lacked resources to provide a secular bureaucracy across its entire territory, guided 'reformation' of faiths provided elements of social control.[174][175]
Antisemitism
edit
After Catherine II annexed eastern Poland in the Polish Partitions,[176] there were restrictions placed against Jews known as the Pale of Settlement, an area of Tsarist Russia inside which Jews were authorized to settle, and outside of which were deprived of various rights such as freedom of movement or commerce.[177] Particularly repressive was Emperor Nicholas I, who sought the forced assimilation of Jews,[178] from 1827 conscripted Jewish children as Cantonists in military institutions in the east aiming to compel them to convert to Christianity,[179] attempted to stratify Jews into "useful" and "not useful" based on wealth[178] and further restricted religious and commercial rights within the Pale of Settlement.[177][180] Emperor Alexander II ceased this harsh treatment and pursued a more bureaucratic type of assimilation,[178] such as compensating the Cantonists for their previous military service, including those who remained Jewish,[177] although certain military ranks were still limited to Christians.[178] In contrast, Emperor Alexander III resumed an atmosphere of oppression, including the May Laws, which further restricted Jewish settlements and rights to own property, as well as limiting the types of professions available,[177][181] and the expulsion of Jews from Kiev in 1886 and Moscow in 1891. The overall anti-Jewish policy of the Russian Empire led to significant sustained emigration.[177]
Persecution of Muslims
editIslam had a "sheltered but precarious" place in the Russian Empire.[182] Initially, sporadic forced conversions and mosque demolitions were carried out against Muslims in the Volga-Ural region, particularly under the Office of Newly Baptized during the 1740s.[183] In the 18th century, Catherine II issued an edict of toleration that gave legal status to Islam and allowed Muslims to fulfill religious obligations.[184] Catherine also established the Orenburg Muslim Spiritual Assembly, which had a degree of imperial jurisdiction over the organization of Islamic practice in the country.[185] As the Russian Empire expanded, tsarist administrators found it expedient to draw on existing Islamic religious institutions that were already in place.[186][185]

In the 19th century, the restrictive policies became much more oppressive during the Russo-Turkish Wars, and the Russian Empire perpetrated persecutions such as the Circassian genocide during the 1860s.[184][188] Following its conquest of Circassia, around 1 to 1.5 million Circassians – almost half of the total population – were killed or forcibly deported.[189] Many of those who fled persecution also died en route to other countries. Today, the vast majority of Circassians live in diaspora communities.[190] Throughout the late 19th century, the term "Circassian" became a common adage for "highwayman" across the Balkan and Anatolian regions, due to the prevalence of homeless Circassian refugees.[191]
Many groups of Muslims such as Crimean Tatars were forced to emigrate to the Ottoman Empire following the Russian defeat in the Crimean War.[192] During the latter portion of the 19th century, the status of Islam in the Russian Empire became associated with the tsarist regime's ideological principles of Official Nationality requiring Russian Orthodoxy.[186] Nonetheless, in certain areas Islamic institutions were allowed to operate, such as the Orenburg Assembly, but were designated with a lower status.[185]
Policy towards non-Eastern Orthodox Christian sects
editDespite the predominance of Orthodoxy, several Christian denominations were professed.[193] Lutherans were particularly tolerated with the invited settlement of Volga Germans and the presence of Baltic German nobility.[194] During the reign of Catherine II, the Jesuit suppression was not promulgated, so Jesuits survived in Russian Empire, and this "Russian Society" played a role in re-establishing the Jesuits in the west.[195] Overall, Roman Catholicism was strictly controlled during Catherine II's reign, which was considered an epoch of relative tolerance for Catholicism.[174][196] Catholics were distrusted by the Russian Empire as elements of Polish nationalism, a perception which especially increased following the January Uprising.[197] After this Russification policies intensified and Orthodox churches such as Alexander Nevsky Cathedral, Warsaw were built across Congress Poland, but no forced conversion was attempted.
Tsarist religious policy was focused on punishing Orthodox dissenters, such as uniates and sectarians.[174] Old Believers were seen as dangerous elements and persecuted heavily.[198][199] Various minor sects such as Spiritual Christians and Molokan were banished in internal exile to Transcaucasia and Central Asia, with some further emigrating to the Americas.[200] Doukhobors came to settle primarily in Canada.[201]
In 1905, Emperor Nicholas II issued a religious toleration edict that gave legal status to non-Orthodox religions.[202] This created a "Golden Age of Old Faith" for the previously persecuted Old Believers until the emergence of the Soviet Union.[199] In the early 20th century, some of the restrictions of the Pale of Settlement were reversed, though were not formally abolished until the February Revolution.[177] However, some historians evaluate Tsar Nicholas II as having given tacit approval to the antisemitic pogroms that resulted from reactionary riots.[180][203] Edward Radzinsky suggested that many pogroms were incited by authorities and supported by the Tsarist Russian secret police, the Okhrana, even if some happened spontaneously.[204] According to Radzinsky, Sergei Witte (appointed Prime Minister in 1905) remarked in his Memoirs that he found that some proclamations inciting pogroms were printed and distributed by imperial Police.[204]: 69
Demography
edit


Imperial census of 1897
editAccording to returns published in 1905, based on the Russian Empire census of 1897, adherents of the different religious communities in the empire numbered approximately as follows.
| Religion | Count of believers[205] | % |
|---|---|---|
| Russian Orthodox | 87,123,604 | 69.3% |
| Muslims | 13,906,972 | 11.1% |
| Roman Catholics | 11,467,994 | 9.1% |
| Rabbinic Jews | 5,215,805 | 4.2% |
| Lutherans[k] | 3,572,653 | 2.8% |
| Old Believers | 2,204,596 | 1.8% |
| Armenian Apostolics | 1,179,241 | 0.9% |
| Buddhists (Minor) and Lamaists (Minor) | 433,863 | 0.4% |
| Other non-Christian religions | 285,321 | 0.2% |
| Reformed | 85,400 | 0.1% |
| Mennonites | 66,564 | 0.1% |
| Armenian Catholics | 38,840 | 0.0% |
| Baptists | 38,139 | 0.0% |
| Karaite Jews | 12,894 | 0.0% |
| Anglicans | 4,183 | 0.0% |
| Other Christian denominations | 3,952 | 0.0% |
Russian Central Asia
editRussian Central Asia was also called Turkestan. As of the 1897 census, Russian Central Asia's five oblasts contained 5,260,300 inhabitants, 13.9 percent of them urban. The largest towns were Tashkent (156,400), Kokand (82,100), Namangan (61,900), and Samarkand (54,900). By 1911, 17 percent of Semireche's population and half of its urban residents were Russians, four-fifths of them agricultural colonists. In the other four oblasts in the same year, Russians constituted only 4 percent of the population, and the overwhelming majority lived in European-style settlements alongside the native quarters in the major towns.[206]
Military
edit

The armed forces of the Russian Empire consisted of the Imperial Russian Army and the Imperial Russian Navy. The Emperor of Russia was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces and implemented his military policies through the Ministry of War and the Ministry of the Navy, which were tasked with administering their respective branches. There was no joint staff, but joint commissions were formed to work on specific tasks that involved both services.[207][208] The Main Staff of the War Ministry administered the Army's organization, training, and mobilization, as well as coordinating the different branches of the Army, while the General Staff was tasked with operational planning. This structure developed in the 1860s after the Crimean War.[209] The Navy Ministry had a similar structure, including a Main Staff tasked with administration and a Naval Technological Committee, and after the Russo-Japanese War a Naval General Staff was added for operational planning and war preparation.[210][211]
Peter the Great transformed Russia's mix of irregular, feudal, and modernized forces into a standing army and navy to meet the demands posed by the Great Northern War against Sweden and the conflicts with the Ottoman Empire. His reign also accelerated changes that had already started earlier. Peter issued a decree in 1699 that formed the basis for army recruitment,[212] founded an artillery school in 1701 and an engineer school in 1709, put together military regulations for the organization of the army in 1716,[213] created administrative organs to oversee the land and naval forces in 1718 (the College of War and the Admiralty),[212] and oversaw the building of a new navy from scratch.[212] These reforms were done with the help of foreign experts, though before the end of Peter's reign these experts were being increasingly replaced by Russian officers.[212]
Most of the enlisted soldiers and sailors were peasant conscripts, though by the late 19th century the Imperial Navy preferred to draft members of the urban working class to fill its more technical roles. Both the army and navy had a shortage of non-commissioned officers, who were promoted from the enlisted ranks and tended to leave the military at the end of their mandatory service.[214][215] Except for a few special units,[216] almost no one voluntarily joined the military without the intention of becoming an officer.[217] After the post-Crimean War reforms, there were three main commissioning sources of army officers: the Page Corps, the cadet corps, and the junker or military schools.[218] The cadet corps, among which the Page Corps was considered the most elite,[219] provided a military boarding school education to the sons of the high nobility as teenagers.[220] The junker schools provided the largest number of officers, and had a two-year education program for older enlisted soldiers that served for at least one year, and these were most often either lesser nobility or commoners.[221] The majority of army officers were nobles, though this changed by the end of the 19th century, with non-nobles being almost half of the officer corps in the 1890s.[222] The source of naval officers was the Naval Cadet Corps.[223] The majority of naval officers were also from the nobility, and many of them were descended from Baltic German or Swedish families with a history of naval service.[224]
The Russian military budget declined in the late 19th century as the government prioritized spending for civilian purposes, paying interest on foreign loans, and building railways.[224] Russia maintained a large peacetime standing army of over one million troops in the decades after the Napoleonic Wars,[225] and at the outbreak of World War I it was the largest in Europe.[226] During the war the Russian Army was unable to match the German Army in tactical and operational proficiency, but its performance against the Austro-Hungarian Army and the Ottoman Army was credible.[227] The Russo-Japanese War took Russia from having the third largest navy in the world to the sixth largest.[228] A reconstruction program was approved by the State Duma in 1912, but it was not completed before World War I.[229] Russia's Baltic Fleet stayed on the defensive against the German High Seas Fleet,[230] but its Black Sea Fleet had success in raiding Ottoman merchant shipping and threatened the ability of the Ottoman Empire to continue the war.[127]
Society
editThe Russian Empire was predominantly a rural society spread over vast spaces. In 1913, 80% of the people were peasants. Soviet historiography proclaimed that the Russian Empire of the 19th century was characterized by systemic crisis, which impoverished the workers and peasants and culminated in the revolutions of the early 20th century. Recent research by Russian scholars disputes this interpretation. Boris Mironov assesses the effects of the reforms of latter 19th-century, especially in terms of the 1861 emancipation of the serfs, agricultural output trends, various standard of living indicators, and taxation of peasants. He argues that those reforms brought about measurable improvements in social welfare. More generally, he finds that the well-being of the Russian people declined during most of the 18th century but increased slowly from the end of the 18th century to 1914.[231]
Estates
editSubjects of the Russian Empire were divided into sosloviyes, or social estates, principally the nobility (dvoryanstvo), clergy, merchants, burghers, cossacks, and peasants. Imperial governance relied heavily on co-opting traditional non-Russian elites—including Baltic German barons, Polish szlachta, Georgian nobility, and Muslim aristocrats—integrating them into the imperial nobility in exchange for administrative loyalty.[232] Meanwhile, certain nomadic and non-Slavic indigenous populations of Siberia, Central Asia, and parts of the Caucasus were governed under a separate legal framework as inorodtsy (lit. 'people of another origin').
A majority of the population, 81.6%, belonged to the peasant order. The other classes were the nobility, 0.6%; clergy, 0.1%; the burghers and merchants, 9.3%; and military, 6.1%. More than 88 million Russians were peasants, some of whom were former serfs (10,447,149 males in 1858) – the remainder being "state peasants" (9,194,891 males in 1858, exclusive of the Archangel governorate) and "domain peasants" (842,740 males the same year).
- Other status
Serfdom
edit
The serfdom that had developed in Russia in the 16th century, and had become enshrined in law in 1649, was abolished in 1861.[233][234]
Household servants or dependents attached to personal service were merely set free, while the landed peasants received their houses and orchards, and allotments of arable land. These allotments were given over to the rural commune, the mir, which was responsible for the payment of taxes for the allotments. For these allotments the peasants had to pay a fixed rent, which could be fulfilled by personal labor. The allotments could be redeemed by peasants with the help of the Crown, and then they were freed from all obligations to the landlord. The Crown paid the landlord and the peasants had to repay the Crown, for forty-nine years at 6% interest. The financial redemption to the landlord was not calculated on the value of the allotments but was considered as compensation for the loss of the compulsory serf labor. Many proprietors contrived to curtail the allotments that the peasants had occupied under serfdom, and frequently deprived them of precisely that land of which they were most in need: pasture lands around their houses. The result was to compel the peasants to rent land from their former masters.[235][236]
Serfs lived in deplorable conditions, often working in the fields for up to six days a week and facing punishment such as being exiled to Siberia or conscripted into military service. Landowners had the right to sell serfs with or without their land. Children of serfs rarely received any formal education. These serfs were heavily taxed, making them the poorest of any Russians.[166] In 1861, Emperor Alexander II saw serfs as a problem that held back Russia's development, so he liberated 23 million serfs to become free,[237] but they remained indigent throughout the former enslaved population despite their rights. The zemstvo system, introduced in 1864, established elected rural assemblies charged with primary schooling, local healthcare, and road maintenance. Although the electoral system heavily favored the landed nobility, peasant representation allowed rural communities to direct a growing share of local revenue toward rural primary schools and agronomic assistance.[238]
- Exceptional status
Peasants
edit

The former serfs became peasants, joining the millions of farmers who already had peasant status.[236][234] Most peasants lived in tens of thousands of small villages under a highly patriarchal system. Hundreds of thousands moved to cities to work in factories, but they typically retained their village connections.[239]
After Emancipation reform, one-quarter of peasants received allotments of only 1.2 hectares (2.9 acres) per male, and one-half received less than 3.4 to 4.6 hectares (8.5 to 11.4 acres); the normal size of the allotment necessary for the subsistence of a family under the three-fields system is estimated at 11 to 17 hectares (28 to 42 acres). This land was of necessity rented from the landlords. The aggregate value of the redemption and land taxes often reached 185 to 275% of the normal rental value of the allotments, not to speak of taxes for recruiting purposes, the church, roads, local administration, and so on, chiefly levied on the peasants. This burden increased every year; consequently, one-fifth of the inhabitants left their houses and cattle disappeared. Every year more than half the adult males (in some districts three-quarters of the men and one-third of the women) quit their homes and wandered throughout Russia in search of work. In the governorates of the Black Earth Area the state of matters was hardly better. Many peasants took "gratuitous allotments", whose amount was about one-eighth of the normal allotments.[240]
The average allotment in Kherson was only 0.36 hectares (0.90 acres), and for allotments from 1.2 to 2.3 hectares (2.9 to 5.8 acres) the peasants paid 5 to 10 rubles in redemption tax. The state peasants were better off; but they, too, were emigrating in masses. It was only in the steppe that the situation was more hopeful. In Ukraine, where the allotments were personal (the mir existing only among state peasants), the state of affairs was not better, on account of high redemption taxes. In the western provinces, where the land was more cheaply valued and the allotments somewhat increased after the Polish insurrection, the situation was better. Finally, in the Baltic provinces nearly all the land belonged to the German landlords, who either farmed the land themselves, with hired laborers, or let it in small farms. Only one-quarter of the peasants were farmers; the remainder were mere laborers.[241]
Landowners
editAccustomed to the use of compulsory labor, the former serf-proprietors failed to adapt to the new conditions. The millions of rubles of redemption money received from the crown was spent without any real or lasting agricultural improvements having been effected. The forests were sold, and the only prosperous landlords were those who exacted rack-rents for the land allotted to peasants. There was an increase of wealth among the few, but along with this a general impoverishment of the mass of the people. Added to this, the peculiar institution of the mir—framed on the principle of community ownership and occupation of the land—the overall effect was not encouraging of individual effort.
During the years 1861 to 1892 the land owned by the nobles decreased 30%, or ranging from 850,000 to 610,000 km2 (210,000,000 to 150,000,000 acres); during the following four years an additional 8,577 km2 (2,119,500 acres) were sold; and since then the sales went on at an accelerated rate, until in 1903 alone close to 8,000 km2 (2,000,000 acres) passed out of their hands. On the other hand, since 1861, and more especially since 1882, when the Peasant Land Bank was founded for making advances to peasants who were desirous of purchasing land, the former serfs, or rather their descendants, had between 1883 and 1904 bought about 78,900 km2 (19,500,000 acres) from their former masters.
In November 1906, however, Emperor Nicholas II promulgated a provisional order permitting the peasants to become freeholders of allotments made at the time of emancipation, all redemption dues being remitted. This measure, which was endorsed by the third Duma in an act passed on 21 December 1908, was calculated to have far-reaching and profound effects on the rural economy of Russia. Thirteen years previously the government had endeavored to secure greater fixity and permanence of tenure by providing that at least twelve years must elapse between every two redistributions of the land belonging to a mir amongst those entitled to share in it. The order of November 1906 provided that the various strips of land held by each peasant should be merged into a single holding; the Duma, however, on the advice of the government, left its implementation to the future, regarding it as an ideal that could only gradually be realized.[241]
Media
editCensorship was heavy-handed until the reign of Alexander II, but it never went away.[242] Newspapers were strictly limited in what they could publish, and intellectuals favored literary magazines for their publishing outlets. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, for example, ridiculed the St. Petersburg newspapers, such as Golos and Peterburgskii Listok, accusing them of publishing trifles and distracting readers from the pressing social concerns of contemporary Russia through their obsession with spectacle and European popular culture.[243]
Education
edit
Educational standards were very low in the Russian Empire, though they slowly increased in its last century of existence. By 1800, the level of literacy among male peasants ranged from 1 to 12 percent and from 20 to 25 percent for urban men. Literacy among women was very low. Literacy rates were highest for the nobility (84 to 87 percent), followed by merchants (over 75 percent), and then the workers and peasants. Serfs were the least literate. In every group, women were far less literate than men. By contrast, in Western Europe, urban men had about a 50 percent literacy rate. The Orthodox hierarchy was suspicious of education, seeing no religious need for literacy whatsoever. Peasants did not need to be literate, and those who did — such as artisans, businessmen, and professionals — were few in number. As late as 1851, only 8% of Russians lived in cities.[244]
The accession in 1801 of Alexander I (1801–1825) was widely welcomed as an opening to fresh liberal ideas from the European Enlightenment. Many reforms were promised, but few were implemented before 1820, when the emperor shifted his focus to foreign affairs and personal religious matters, neglecting issues of reform. In sharp contrast to Western Europe, the entire empire had a very small bureaucracy – about 17,000 public officials, most of whom lived in two of the largest cities, Moscow and Saint Petersburg. Modernization of government required much larger numbers; but that, in turn, required an educational system that could provide suitable training. Russia lacked that, and for university education, young men went to Western Europe. The army and the church had their own training programs, narrowly focused on their particular needs. The most important successful reform under Alexander I was the creation of a national system of education.[245]

The Ministry of Education was established in 1802, and the country was divided into six educational regions. The long-term plan was for a university in every region, a secondary school in every major city, upgraded primary schools, and – serving the largest number of students – a parish school for every two parishes. By 1825, the national government operated six universities, forty-eight secondary state schools, and 337 improved primary schools. Highly qualified teachers arrived from France, fleeing the revolution there. Exiled Jesuits set up elite boarding schools until their order was expelled in 1815. At the highest level, universities were based on the German model—in Kazan, Kharkov, St. Petersburg, Vilna (refounded as the Imperial University in 1803) and Dorpat—while the relatively young Imperial Moscow University was expanded. The higher forms of education were reserved for a very small elite, with only a few hundred students at the universities by 1825 and 5500 in the secondary schools. There were no schools open to girls. Most rich families still depended on private tutors.[246]
Emperor Nicholas I was a reactionary who wanted to neutralize foreign ideas, especially those he ridiculed as "pseudo-knowledge". Nevertheless, his Minister of Education, Sergey Uvarov, promoted greater academic freedom at the university level for faculty members, who were under suspicion by reactionary church officials. Uvarov raised academic standards, improved facilities, and opened the admission doors a bit wider. Nicholas tolerated Uvarov's achievements until 1848, after which he reversed these innovations.[247] For the rest of the century, the national government continued to focus on universities, and generally ignored elementary and secondary educational needs. By 1900 there were 17,000 university students, and over 30,000 were enrolled in specialized technical institutes. The students were conspicuous in Moscow and Saint Petersburg as a political force typically at the forefront of demonstrations and disturbances.[248] The majority of tertiary institutions in the empire used Russian, while some used other languages but later underwent Russification.[249] Other educational institutions in the empire included the Nersisian School in Tiflis.
See also
editNotes
edit- ↑ Principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia in 1829–1856.
- ↑ In 1914, the city was renamed Petrograd to reflect anti-German sentiments of Russia during World War I.[1]
- ↑ The capital was moved back to Moscow by Peter II of Russia following his coronation; this was undone by Anna of Russia.[2]
- ↑ As Chairman of the Committee of Ministers.
- ↑
- Russian: Российская империя, romanized: Rossiyskaya imperiya; pre-reform spelling: Россійская имперія; IPA: [rɐˈsʲijskəjə ɪmˈpʲerʲɪjə] ⓘ
- Also known as the All-Russian Empire, Imperial Russia, Tsarist Russia, or simply Russia.
- ↑ Russian: Отец отечества, romanized: Otets otechestva, IPA: [ɐˈtʲet͡s ɐˈtʲet͡ɕɪstvə]
- ↑ Russian: Император и Самодержец Всероссийский, romanized: Imperator i Samoderzhets Vserossiyskiy
- ↑ Originally there was no distinction between the titles tsar and imperator. However, tsar was also used to refer to other monarchs below the rank of "emperor" (according to the Western European view), and thus Westerners began to translate tsar as rex ("king"). By adopting the title imperator, Peter claimed equality to the Holy Roman Emperor.[33][34]
- ↑ First and only census carried out in the Russian Empire.
- ↑ A ukaz of 1879 gave the governors the right to report secretly on the qualifications of candidates for the office of justice of the peace. In 1889, Alexander III abolished the election of justices of the peace, except in certain large towns and some outlying parts of the Empire, and greatly restricted the right of trial by jury. The combining of judicial and administrative functions was introduced again by the appointment of officials as judges. In 1909, the third Duma restored the election of justices of the peace.
- ↑ The Lutheran Church was the dominant faith of the Baltic Provinces, Ingria, and the Grand Duchy of Finland
References
edit- ↑ "St. Petersburg through the Ages". St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. Archived from the original on 6 August 2022. Retrieved 6 August 2022.
- ↑ "18th Century in the Russian History", Rusmania. Archived 19 March 2022 at the Wayback Machine.
- 1 2 3 4 Taagepera, Rein (September 1997). "Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia". International Studies Quarterly. 41 (3): 475–504. doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00053. JSTOR 2600793. Archived from the original on 19 November 2018. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
- ↑ Turchin, Peter; Adams, Jonathan M.; Hall, Thomas D. (December 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires". Journal of World-Systems Research. 12 (2): 223. ISSN 1076-156X. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 11 September 2016.
- ↑ "The Price of Expansion: The Nationality Problem in Russia of the Eighteenth-Early Twentieth Centuries". Slavic Research Center. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 20 July 2024.
- ↑ "Population of the Major European Countries in the 19th Century". Wesleyan University. Archived from the original on 28 February 2024. Retrieved 20 July 2024.
- ↑ "Population of Russia and the USSR, 1913 to 1928". Research Gate. Retrieved 20 July 2024.
- ↑ "First General Census of the Russian Empire of 1897". Demoscope Weekly. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
- ↑ Pipes 1974, p. 80.
- ↑ "The Great Game, 1856–1907: Russo-British Relations in Central and East Asia". reviews.history.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 10 April 2022. Retrieved 8 October 2021.
- ↑ Moon, David (2001). The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia 1762–1907. Longman. pp. 22–24. ISBN 978-0-582-29486-8.
- ↑ Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. (2011). A History of Russia (8th ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 371–385. ISBN 978-0-19-534197-3.
- ↑ Vinkovetsky, Ilya (2011). Russian America: An Overseas Colony of a Continental Empire, 1804–1867. Oxford University Press. pp. 12–19. ISBN 978-0-19-539128-2.
- ↑ Gregory, Paul R. (1982). Russian National Income, 1885–1913. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55–59. ISBN 978-0-521-24382-7.
- ↑ "Russian Empire". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 25 December 2022. Retrieved 14 August 2022.
- ↑ Hosking, Geoffrey (1973). The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–15. ISBN 978-0-521-20190-2.
- ↑ Gatrell, Peter (2014). Russia's First World War: A Social and Economic History. Routledge. pp. 154–170. ISBN 978-0-582-32818-1.
- ↑ Wade, Rex A. (21 April 2005). The Russian Revolution, 1917. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-84155-9.
- ↑ Swain, Geoffrey (2014). Trotsky and the Russian Revolution. Routledge. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-317-81278-4. OL 37192398M. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
The first government to be formed after the February Revolution of 1917 had, with one exception, been composed of liberals.
- ↑ Rabinowitch, Alexander (2008). The Bolsheviks in Power: The First Year of Soviet Rule in Petrograd. Indiana University Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-253-22042-4. Retrieved 20 June 2015.
- ↑ Planert, Ute; Retallack, James, eds. (2017). Decades of Reconstruction. Cambridge University Press. p. 331. ISBN 978-1-107-16574-8. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
- ↑ Bushkovitch, Paul (2012). A Concise History of Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 48. ISBN 978-0-5215-4323-1. Archived from the original on 23 April 2023. Retrieved 30 December 2023.
Ivan III in his own time already had the reputation of the builder of the Russian state... The consolidation of Russia as a state was not just a territorial issue, for Ivan also began the development of a state apparatus...
; Millar, James R. (2004). Encyclopedia of Russian History. New York: Macmillan Reference USA. p. 687. ISBN 978-0-0286-5693-9. Archived from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 30 December 2023.Under Ivan III's reign, the uniting of separate Russian principalities into a centralized state made great and rapid progress.
- 1 2 3 4 Lieven 2021, p. 964.
- ↑ Moss 2003, p. 88.
- 1 2 3 Lieven 2021, p. 965.
- ↑ Moss 2003, p. 131.
- ↑ Anisimov, Yevgeniya (2017). "Peter I". Great Russian Encyclopedia [in electronic source] (in Russian). Archived from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
- ↑ Osipov, Yuriy, ed. (2015). "The Great Northern War 1700–21". Romania to Saint-Jean-de-Luz. Great Russian Encyclopedia. 2004–2017 (in Russian). Vol. 29. pp. 617–20. ISBN 978-5-8527-0366-8. Archived from the original on 17 April 2021. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
- ↑ Pipes 1974, pp. 9–10, Chapter 1: The Environment and its Consequences.
- ↑ Madariaga, Isabel De (17 June 2014). Politics and Culture in Eighteenth-Century Russia: Collected Essays by Isabel de Madariaga. Routledge. pp. 15–16. ISBN 978-1-317-88190-2.
- ↑ "Прошение сенаторов к царю Петру I о принятии им титула "Отца Отечества, императора Всероссийского, Петра Великого"" [Petition of the senators to Tsar Peter I for the adoption of the title of "Father of the Fatherland, Emperor of all the Russias, Peter the Great"]. Russian educational portal | Historical documents. Archived from the original on 29 August 2018. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
- ↑ Feldbrugge 2017, p. 152.
- ↑ Madariaga, Isabel De (2014). Politics and Culture in Eighteenth-Century Russia. Routledge. pp. 40–42. ISBN 978-1-317-88190-2.
This explains much of the difficulty encountered by Peter I when he adopted the title Imperator. The etymological origin of the word tsar had been glossed over and the title had been devalued.
- ↑ Ageyeva, Olga (1999). "Титул "Император" И Понятие "Империя" В России В Первой Четверти XVIII Века" [The title "emperor" and the concept of "empire" in Russia in the first quarter of the 18th century]. World of History: Russian Electronic Journal (in Russian) (5). Archived from the original on 16 March 2022.
- ↑ Solovyov, Yevgeny (2006). Петр I в Отечественной Историографии: Конца XVIII – Начала XX ВВ [Peter I in Russian historiography of the late 18th – early 20th centuries] (Doctor of Historical Sciences thesis) (in Russian). Moscow. Archived from the original on 7 July 2018.
- ↑ Hughes 1998, pp. 216–226.
- ↑ Drozdek, Adam (2021). Theological Reflection in Eighteenth-Century Russia. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. x. ISBN 978-1-7936-4184-7.
- ↑ Dubakov, Maxim Valentinovich (2004). Промышленно-торговая политика Петра 1 [Industrial and trade policy of Peter I] (Dissertation abstract thesis) (in Russian). Moscow. Archived from the original on 14 April 2018. Retrieved 4 April 2023.
- ↑ Hughes 1998, pp. 298–305.
- ↑ Hughes 1998.
- ↑ Novosyolova, Nataliya Ivanovna (1999). Внешняя торговля и финансово-экономическая политика Петра I [Foreign trade and financial and economic policy of Peter I] (Abstract dissertation thesis) (in Russian). Saint Petersburg. Archived from the original on 29 June 2018. Retrieved 5 April 2023.
- ↑ Cracraft, James (2003). The Revolution of Peter the Great. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6740-1196-0.
- ↑ "BOUNDARIES ii. With Russia". iranicaonline.org. Archived from the original on 5 September 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Longworth, Philip; Charlton, John (1972). The Three Empresses: Catherine I, Anne and Elizabeth of Russia. Constable. ISBN 978-0-09-458040-4.
- ↑ De Madariaga, Isabel (1981). Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-3000-2515-6.
- ↑ Alexander, John T. (1969). Autocratic Politics in a National Crisis: The Imperial Russian Government and Pugachev's Revolt, 1773–1775. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-2533-1110-8.
- ↑ Massie, Robert K. (2011). Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman. Random House. ISBN 978-1-5883-6044-1.
- ↑ Catherine II. Novodel Sestroretsk Rouble 1771, Heritage Auctions, archived from the original on 22 April 2016, retrieved 1 September 2015
- ↑ Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. (1984). A History of Russia (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 284. ISBN 978-0-1950-3391-5.
- ↑ Catchpole 1974, pp. 8–31; Gilbert, Martin. Atlas of Russian history (1993) pp 33–74.
- ↑ Catchpole 1974, p. 25; "Первая всеобщая перепись населения Российской Империи 1897 г." [First general census of the population of the Russian Empire in 1897]. Demoscope Weekly (in Russian). Archived from the original on 4 February 2012. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
- ↑ Blum, Jerome (1961). Lord and Peasant in Russia from the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press. p. 278.
- ↑ Dowling 2014, p. 24.
- ↑ Dowling 2014, p. 801.
- ↑ Mikaberidze, Alexander (2020). The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History. Oxford University Press. pp. 554–572. ISBN 978-0-19-995106-2.
- ↑ Mikaberidze, Alexander (2020). The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History. Oxford University Press. pp. 668–675. ISBN 978-0-19-995106-2.
- ↑ Baykov, Alexander (1954). "The Economic Development of Russia". Economic History Review. 7 (2): 137–149. doi:10.2307/2591611. JSTOR 2591611.
- ↑ Lincoln, W. Bruce (1978). Nicholas I, Emperor and Autocrat of All the Russias. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-2533-4059-7.
- 1 2 Mazour, Anatole G. (1961). The First Russian Revolution, 1825: The Decembrist Movement, Its Origins, Development, and Significance. Stanford University Press. pp. 260–272.
- ↑ Stein 1976.
- ↑ Dowling 2014, p. 728.
- ↑ Dowling 2014, p. 729.
- ↑ Lang, David Marshall (1957). The last years of the Georgian monarchy, 1658–1832.
- ↑ Burant, Stephen R. (1985). "The January Uprising of 1863 in Poland: Sources of Disaffection and the Arenas of Revolt". European History Quarterly. 15 (2): 131–156. doi:10.1177/026569148501500201.
- 1 2 Haynes, Margaret (2017). Tsarist and Communist Russia 1855–1964. Oxford: University Press. p. 23. ISBN 978-0-1984-2144-3. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
- ↑ Davies, Norman (1981). God's Playground: A History of Poland. Vol. 2. Oxford University Press. pp. 315–333, 352–63.
- ↑ Figes, Orlando (2010). The Crimean War: A History. Metropolitan Books. pp. 467–482. ISBN 978-0-8050-7460-4.
- ↑ Radzinsky, Edvard (2006). Alexander II: The Last Great Tsar. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-7432-8426-4.
- ↑ Baten, Jörg (2016). A History of the Global Economy. From 1500 to the Present. Cambridge University Press. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-1075-0718-0.
- ↑ Moon, David (2001). The Abolition of Serfdom in Russia 1762–1907. Longman. pp. 22–24. ISBN 978-0-582-29486-8.
- ↑ Polunov, Alexander Y.; Owen, Thomas C.; Zakharova, Larisa G. (2015). Russia in the Nineteenth Century: Autocracy, Reform, and Social Change, 1814–1914. Routledge. p. 164. ISBN 978-1-3174-6049-7. Archived from the original on 21 January 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
- ↑ "Russian Opinion on the Cession of Alaska". The American Historical Review. 48 (3): 521–531. 1 April 1943. doi:10.2307/1839639. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 1839639.
- ↑ Akinsha, Konstantin; Kozlov, Georgi; Hochfleid, Sylvya (2008). The Holy Place: Architecture, Ideology, and History in Russia. Yale University Press. p. 74. ISBN 978-0-3001-4497-0. Archived from the original on 17 January 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2023.; Borrero, Mauricio (2009). Russia: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present. Infobase Publishing. p. 54. ISBN 978-0-8160-7475-4. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 21 January 2023.
- ↑ Bailey, Thomas A. (1 March 1934). "Why the United States Purchased Alaska". Pacific Historical Review. 3 (1): 39–49. doi:10.2307/3633456. ISSN 0030-8684. JSTOR 3633456.
- ↑ Jones, Preston (2017). The Fires of Patriotism: Alaskans in the Days of the First World War 1910–1920. University of Alaska Press. p. 21. ISBN 978-1-6022-3206-8.
- ↑ Grinev, Andrei V. (18 February 2010). "The Plans for Russian Expansion in the New World and the North Pacific in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries". European Journal of American Studies. 5 (2). doi:10.4000/ejas.7805. ISSN 1991-9336.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 113.
- 1 2 Chapman 2002, p. 114.
- ↑ Hosking 2011, p. 315.
- ↑ Hosking 2011, p. 316.
- ↑ Waldron 1997, p. 121.
- ↑ Seton-Watson 1967, pp. 445–460.
- ↑ Daly, Jonathan (1998). Autocracy Under Siege: Security Police and Opposition in Russia, 1866–1905. Northern Illinois University Press. pp. 49–75, 124–138. ISBN 978-0-87580-243-5.
- ↑ Morrison, Alexander (2020). The Russian Conquest of Central Asia: A Study in Imperial Expansion, 1814–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 184–215, 290–320. ISBN 978-1-107-03030-5.
- ↑ Morrison, Alexander (2020). The Russian Conquest of Central Asia: A Study in Imperial Expansion, 1814–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 450–475. ISBN 978-1-107-03030-5.
- ↑ Andreev, A. I. (2003). Soviet Russia and Tibet: the debacle of secret diplomacy, 1918-1930s. Leiden: Brill. pp. 13–15, 37, 67, 96. ISBN 9-0041-2952-9. OCLC 51330174. Archived from the original on 24 January 2023. Retrieved 22 March 2023.
In the days of the Great Game, Mongolia was an object of imperialist encroachment by Russia, as Tibet was for the British.
- ↑ Connaughton, Richard (January 2002). "Port Arthur Revisited". HistoryToday.com.
- ↑ Jelavich, Barbara (1974). St. Petersburg and Moscow: Tsarist and Soviet Foreign Policy, 1814–1974. pp. 161–279. OCLC 299007. OL 5911156M.
- ↑ Ascher 2004, pp. 187–210.
- ↑ Harcave, Sidney (1964). "The "Two Russias"". First blood: the Russian Revolution of 1905. Macmillan. OCLC 405923. OL 5918954M.
- ↑ Warth, Robert D. (1997). Nicholas II: The Life and Reign of Russia's Last Monarch. Praeger. ISBN 978-0-2759-5832-9.
- ↑ Lieven 2006, p. 391.
- ↑ Freeze 2002, pp. 234–268.
- ↑ Seton-Watson, Hugh (1952). The Decline of Imperial Russia, 1855–1914. pp. 277–280.
- ↑ Radkey, Oliver H. (1953). "An Alternative to Bolshevism: The Program of Russian Social Revolutionism". Journal of Modern History. 25 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1086/237562.
- ↑ Cavendish, Richard (2003). "The Bolshevik-Menshevik split November 16th, 1903". History Today. 53 (11): 64ff.
- ↑ Ascher 2004, pp. 160–186.
- ↑ Ascher 2004, pp. 68–75.
- ↑ Ascher 2004, pp. 158–164.
- ↑ Fromkin, David (2010). A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East. Henry Holt and Company. p. 208. ISBN 978-1-4299-8852-0. Archived from the original on 29 December 2022. Retrieved 10 January 2023.
- ↑ Lieven 2015, p. 82.
- ↑ Waldron 1997, p. 132.
- ↑ Lieven 2015, p. 241.
- ↑ McMeekin 2011, p. 88.
- ↑ Hamilton, Richard F.; Herwig, Holger, eds. (2003). The Origins of World War I. Cambridge University Press. p. 180. ISBN 978-0-5218-1735-6. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Lieven 2015, p. 338.
- ↑ Ruthchild, Rochelle (2010). Equality and Revolution. University of Pittsburgh Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-8229-7375-1. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Goldman, Emily (2011). Power in Uncertain Times: Strategy in the Fog of Peace. Stanford University Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-8047-7433-8. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Zabecki, David T. (2014). Germany at War: 400 Years of Military History. ABC-CLIO. p. 371. ISBN 978-1-5988-4981-3. Archived from the original on 4 January 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
- ↑ McNally, Michael (2022). Tannenberg 1914: Destruction of the Russian Second Army. Bloomsbury. p. 61. ISBN 978-1-4728-5020-1. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Tucker 2014, p. 1048.
- ↑ Tucker, Spencer C.; Roberts, Priscilla M., eds. (2005). World War I: Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 380. ISBN 978-1-8510-9420-2. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Tucker 2019, p. 468.
- ↑ Sondhaus, Lawrence (2020). World War One. Cambridge University Press. p. 114. ISBN 978-1-1084-9619-3. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Kalic, Sean N.; Brown, Gates M. (2017). Russian Revolution of 1917: The Essential Reference Guide. ABC-CLIO. p. 180. ISBN 978-1-4408-5093-6. Archived from the original on 28 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2014a). 500 Great Military Leaders. ABC-CLIO. p. 556. ISBN 978-1-5988-4758-1. Archived from the original on 28 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Horne, John (2012). A Companion to World War I. John Wiley & Sons. p. 449. ISBN 978-1-1199-6870-2. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- ↑ Sanborn 2014, p. 30.
- ↑ Sanborn 2014, p. 66.
- ↑ Sanborn 2014, p. 125–126.
- ↑ Tucker 2014, p. 514.
- ↑ McMeekin 2011, p. 111–112.
- ↑ McMeekin 2011, p. 114.
- ↑ Tucker 2019, p. 524.
- ↑ Halpern 1994, p. 238.
- ↑ Halpern 1994, pp. 223–230.
- 1 2 Halpern 1994, pp. 232–233.
- ↑ Gatrell, Peter (2014). Russia's First World War: A Social and Economic History. Routledge. pp. 86–112, 154–170. ISBN 978-0-582-32818-1.
- ↑ Gatrell, Peter (2014). Russia's First World War: A Social and Economic History. Routledge. pp. 197–205. ISBN 978-0-582-32818-1.
- ↑ Pipes 2011, p. 77–78.
- ↑ Pipes 2011, p. 79.
- ↑ Pipes 2011, p. 90–91.
- 1 2 3 Dukes 1998, p. 212.
- ↑ Middleton 2015, p. 810.
- ↑ Martin Gilbert, Routledge Atlas of Russian History (4th ed. 2007) Gilbert, Martin (2007). The Routledge Atlas of Russian History. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415394840.
- ↑ Parker, William Henry (1968). An Historical Geography of Russia. Aldine Publishing Company. pp. 15–32.
- ↑ Gilbert, Martin (2007). The Routledge Atlas of Russian History (4th ed.). Routledge. pp. 2–9. ISBN 978-0-415-39484-0.
- ↑ Kissinger, Henry (1994). Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. p. 142. ISBN 978-0-6716-5991-2. OCLC 29428792. OL 1432465M.
- ↑ Dowling 2014, p. 728–730.
- ↑ Paine, S. C. M. (2003). The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 317–322. ISBN 978-0-521-61745-1.
- ↑ Pierce, Richard A. (1965). Russia's Hawaiian Adventure, 1815–1817. University of California Press. pp. 45–62.
- ↑ Yakobson, Sergius (1939). "Russia and Africa: (II)". The Slavonic and East European Review. 19 (53/54): 158–174. JSTOR 4203590.
- 1 2 Williams 1994, p. 149.
- 1 2 3 4 Stavrou 1969, p. 97.
- ↑ Raeff 1984, p. 189, "In the spring of 1906 elections were held for the Duma and Russia gained a new government that was constitutional in character. This is not the place to discuss the controversial question whether the government established in 1906 was truly constitutional or not".
- ↑ Thompson 2004, p. 415, "Under the Fundamental Laws adopted in 1906 as a semi-constitutional structure for Russia, the tsar could dissolve the Duma and enact emergency legislation in its absence".
- ↑ Stepanov, Valerii L. (2009). "Revisiting Russian Conservatism". Russian Studies in History. 48 (2): 3–7. doi:10.2753/RSH1061-1983480200.
- ↑ Martin, Alexander M. (1997). Romantics, Reformers, Reactionaries: Russian Conservative Thought and Politics in the Reign of Alexander I.
- ↑ Wolfe, Bertram D. (2018). Revolution and Reality. University of North Carolina Press Books. p. 349. ISBN 978-1-4696-5020-3.
- ↑ Plokhy, Serhii (2010). The origins of the Slavic nations: premodern identities in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-5211-5511-3.
- ↑ "Fundamental Laws of the Russian Empire". chapter1, article 7. Archived from the original on 31 March 2017.
- ↑ Hosking, Geoffrey (1973). The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 42–48. ISBN 978-0-521-20190-2.
- ↑ Hosking, Geoffrey (1973). The Russian Constitutional Experiment: Government and Duma, 1907–1914. Cambridge University Press. pp. 49–54. ISBN 978-0-521-20190-2.
- ↑ Seton-Watson 1967, pp. 627–634.
- ↑ Lecky, Colum (January 2022). "Forging a Unitary State: Russia's Management of the Eurasian Space, 1650–1850 by John LeDonne (review)". muse.jhu.edu. Retrieved 14 April 2026.
The structure of LeDonne's analysis facilitates systematic comparison of the three theaters and highlights the impediments to unitary governance in a multiethnic and religiously diverse state. Russia...
- ↑ LeDonne, John P. "Forging a Unitary State". University of Toronto Press.
Covering two centuries of Russian history, Forging a Unitary State is a comprehensive account of the creation of what is commonly known as the "Russian Empire," from Poland to Siberia. In this book, John P. LeDonne demonstrates that the so-called empire was, for the most part, a unitary state, defined by an obsessive emphasis on centralization and uniformity.
- ↑ Kappeler, Andreas (2001). The Russian Empire: A Multi-Ethnic History. Routledge. pp. 110–118. ISBN 978-0-582-23415-4.
- ↑ Raun, Toivo U. (2001). Estonia and the Estonians (2nd ed.). Hoover Institution Press. pp. 62–74. ISBN 978-0-8179-2852-0.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 3.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 5.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 49.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 129.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 130.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 131.
- ↑ Markevich, Andrei; Harrison, Mark (2011). "Great War, Civil War, and Recovery: Russia's National Income, 1913 to 1928". The Journal of Economic History. 71 (3): 672–703. doi:10.1017/S0022050711001886.
- 1 2 Chapman 2002, p. 4.
- ↑ Waldron 1997, p. 27.
- ↑ Ziegler, Charles E. (2009). The History of Russia. ABC-CLIO. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-3133-6307-8. Archived from the original on 16 January 2023. Retrieved 16 January 2023.
- ↑ Waldron 1997, p. 55–56.
- ↑ Sperling, Walter (2006). "Building a Railway, Creating Imperial Space: 'Locality,' 'Region,' 'Russia,' 'Empire' as Political Arguments in Post-Reform Russia". Ab Imperio. 2006 (2): 101–134. doi:10.1353/imp.2006.0069.
- ↑ Sarah Searight, "Russian railway penetration of Central Asia", Asian Affairs (June 1992) 23#2 pp. 171–180.
- ↑ Article 62 of the 1906 Fundamental Laws (previously, Article 40): "The primary and predominant Faith in the Russian Empire is the Christian Orthodox Catholic Faith of the Eastern Confession."
- ↑ Coleman 2014, p. 4, "After all, Orthodoxy was both the majority faith in the Russian Empire – approximately 70 percent subscribed to this faith in the 1897 census–and the state religion".
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). The Russian Empire 1450–1801 (1st ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 404, 407–408. ISBN 978-0-1992-8051-3. OCLC 969962873.
- 1 2 Davies, Franziska; Wessel, Martin Schulze; Brenner, Michael (2015). Jews and Muslims in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 47–52. ISBN 978-3-6473-1028-2. OCLC 930490047.
- ↑ "1791: Catherine the Great Tells Jews Where They Can Live". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 "The Pale of Settlement". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on 15 October 2019. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- 1 2 3 4 "Russia Virtual Jewish History Tour". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on 23 April 2020. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- ↑ "Cantonists". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on 2 February 2022. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- 1 2 "Nicholas". www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org. Archived from the original on 2 February 2022. Retrieved 2 February 2022.
- ↑ "This Day in Jewish History May Laws Punish Russia's Jews". Haaretz. Archived from the original on 28 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Brower, Daniel (1996). "Russian Roads to Mecca: Religious Tolerance and Muslim Pilgrimage in the Russian Empire". Slavic Review. 55 (3): 567–584. doi:10.2307/2502001. ISSN 0037-6779. JSTOR 2502001. S2CID 163469315. Archived from the original on 29 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Werth, Paul W. (2003). "Coercion and Conversion: Violence and the Mass Baptism of the Volga Peoples, 1740–55". Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 4 (3): 543–569. doi:10.1353/kri.2003.0046.
- 1 2 Campbell, Elena I. (2015). The Muslim question and Russian imperial governance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 1–25. ISBN 978-0-2530-1454-2. OCLC 902954232. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
- 1 2 3 Allen, Frank (2021). Muslim Religious Institutions in Imperial Russia: The Islamic World of Novouzensk District and the Kazakh Inner Horde, 1780–1910. Brill. pp. 1–3, 100. ISBN 978-9-0044-9232-5.
- 1 2 Crews, Robert D. (2006). For prophet and tsar : Islam and empire in Russia and Central Asia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. pp. 293–294. ISBN 0-6740-2164-9. OCLC 62282613. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
- ↑ Richmond, Walter (2013). "4: 1864". The Circassian Genocide. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US: Rutgers University Press. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-8135-6068-7.
- ↑ Richmond, Walter (2013). The Circassian Genocide. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US: Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-6068-7.
- ↑ Levene, Mark; Roberts, Penny (1999). "7: The Circassians: A Forgotten Genocide?". In Shenfield, Stephen D. (ed.). The Massacre in History. New York: Berghahn Books. pp. 149–162. ISBN 1-5718-1935-5. Archived from the original on 16 December 2023. Retrieved 22 August 2023.
The number who died in the Circassian catastrophe of the 1860s could hardly, therefore, have been fewer than one million, and may well have been closer to one-and-a-half million
; Ahmed, Akbar (2013). The Thistle and the Drone. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. p. 357. ISBN 978-0-8157-2378-3.; Richmond, Walter (2013). "4: 1864". The Circassian Genocide. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US: Rutgers University Press. pp. 88–93. ISBN 978-0-8135-6068-7.; Cataliotti, Joseph (22 October 2023). "Circassian Genocide: Overview & History". Study.com. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023. Retrieved 22 August 2023.; "Circassian Genocide on its 159th Anniversary – Genocide is a Crime against Humanity!". Human Rights Association. 21 May 2023. Archived from the original on 22 August 2023. - ↑ Richmond, Walter (2013). The Circassian Genocide. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US: Rutgers University Press. pp. 91, 92. ISBN 978-0-8135-6068-7.; Peach, Gary (10 November 2010). "Forgotten genocides of the Caucasus". Politico. Archived from the original on 25 October 2020.; Shenfield, Stephen D. (1999). "7: The Circassians: A Forgotten Genocide?". In Levene, Mark; Roberts, Penny (eds.). The Massacre in History. New York, NY, US: Berghahn Books. pp. 149–162. ISBN 1-5718-1935-5. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.; King, Charles (2008). "2: Rule and Resistance". A History of the Caucasus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 96–98. ISBN 978-0-1951-7775-6. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
- ↑ King, Charles (2008). "2: Rule and Resistance". A History of the Caucasus. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. p. 98. ISBN 978-0-1951-7775-6. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
- ↑ Williams, Brian Glyn (2000). "Hijra and Forced Migration from Nineteenth-Century Russia to the Ottoman Empire. A Critical Analysis of the Great Crimean Tatar Emigration of 1860–1861". Cahiers du Monde russe. 41 (1): 79–108. doi:10.4000/monderusse.39. ISSN 1252-6576. JSTOR 20171169. S2CID 36114349.
- ↑ Paert, Irina (1 February 2017). "The Tsar's Foreign Faiths: Toleration and the Fate of Religious Freedom in Imperial Russia by Paul W. Werth". The English Historical Review. 132 (554): 175–177. doi:10.1093/ehr/cew383. ISSN 0013-8266. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Stricker, Gerd (1 June 2001). "Lutherans in Russia since 1990". Religion, State and Society. 29 (2): 101–113. doi:10.1080/09637490120074792. ISSN 0963-7494. S2CID 145405540. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Binzley, Ronald A. (1 June 2017). "How the Jesuits Survived Their Suppression: The Society of Jesus in the Russian Empire (1773–1814), written by Mark Inglot, S.J." Journal of Jesuit Studies. 4 (3): 489–491. doi:10.1163/22141332-00403007. ISSN 2214-1324.
- ↑ Zatko, James J. (1960). "The Roman Catholic Church and Its Legal Position under the Provisional Government in Russia in 1917". The Slavonic and East European Review. 38 (91): 476–492. ISSN 0037-6795. JSTOR 4205179. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
- ↑ Weeks, Ted (1 January 2011). ""Religion, Nationality, or Politics: Catholicism in the Russian Empire, 1863–1905"". Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2 (1): 52–59. doi:10.1016/j.euras.2010.10.008. ISSN 1879-3665. S2CID 145315419.
- ↑ Rubinstein, Samara; Dulik, Matthew C.; Gokcumen, Omer; Zhadanov, Sergey; Osipova, Ludmila; Cocca, Maggie; Mehta, Nishi; Gubina, Marina; Posukh, Olga; Schurr, Theodore G. (2008). "Russian Old Believers: genetic consequences of their persecution and exile, as shown by mitochondrial DNA evidence". Human Biology. 80 (3): 203–237. doi:10.3378/1534-6617-80.3.203. ISSN 0018-7143. PMID 19130794. S2CID 9520618.
- 1 2 "Perspective | Russian Orthodox Old Believers: Keeping their faith and fighting fires in the West Siberian Plain". Washington Post. 26 May 2017. Archived from the original on 13 November 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Hardwick, Susan W. (1993). "Religion and Migration: The Molokan Experience". Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers. 55: 127–141. ISSN 0066-9628. JSTOR 24040086. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
- ↑ Sainsbury, Brendan (24 June 2021). "Canada's little-known Russian sect". www.bbc.com. Archived from the original on 17 October 2021. Retrieved 17 October 2021.
- ↑ "On This Day: Nicholas II Signs Decree for "Tolerance Development"". The Moscow Times. 30 April 2019. Archived from the original on 29 October 2021. Retrieved 15 October 2021.
- ↑ Sperber, Jonathan (2013). Europe 1850–1914 : progress, participation and apprehension. Oxon, England: Routledge. p. 325. ISBN 978-1-3158-3501-3. OCLC 874151263. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.; Masis, Julie (29 November 2017). "In the former Soviet Union, statues and hero worship for leaders of pogroms". The Times of Israel. ISSN 0040-7909. Archived from the original on 27 April 2022. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
- 1 2 Radzinsky, Edvard (30 March 2011). The Last Tsar: The Life and Death of Nicholas II. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. pp. 69, 77, 79. ISBN 978-0-3077-5462-2. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 27 April 2022.
To the tsar, the pogroms organized by the police seemed like a holy outburst of popular indignation against the revolutionaries
- ↑ Первая всеобщая перепись населения Российской Империи 1897 г. Распределение населения по вероисповеданиям и регионам [First general census of the population of the Russian Empire in 1897. Distribution of the population by faiths and regions] (in Russian). archipelag.ru. Archived from the original on 24 October 2012.
- ↑ Millar, James R., ed. (2004). "Turkestan". Encyclopedia of Russian History. Macmillan Reference USA. ISBN 978-0-02-865693-9.
- ↑ General Staff, War Office 1914, pp. 18–19.
- ↑ Papastratigakis 2011, p. 40.
- ↑ Mayzel 1975, pp. 297–299.
- ↑ Vinogradov 1998, p. 269.
- ↑ Westwood 1994, p. 12.
- 1 2 3 4 Anderson 1995, pp. 91–96.
- ↑ Anderson 1995, pp. 97–98.
- ↑ Papastratigakis 2011, pp. 53–54.
- ↑ Reese 2019, pp. 98–104.
- ↑ General Staff, War Office 1914, pp. 7–12.
- ↑ Reese 2019, p. 128.
- ↑ General Staff, War Office 1914, pp. 15–17.
- ↑ Reese 2019, pp. 37–40.
- ↑ Reese 2019, pp. 44–45.
- ↑ Reese 2019, pp. 41–44.
- ↑ Reese 2019, pp. 27–28.
- ↑ Mikaberidze, Alexander (2005). The Russian Officer Corps of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1795-1815. Savas Beatie. p. xxiv. ISBN 978-1-932714-02-9.
- 1 2 Papastratigakis 2011, p. 53.
- ↑ Brooks, E. Willis (1984). "Reform in the Russian Army, 1856-1861". Slavic Review. 43 (1): 64. doi:10.2307/2498735. JSTOR 2498735.
- ↑ Stone 2021, p. 33.
- ↑ Stone 2021, p. 4.
- ↑ Budzbon, Przemysław (1986). "Russia". In Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal (eds.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. London: Conway Maritime Press. p. 291. ISBN 0-85177-245-5.
- ↑ Halpern 1994, pp. 17–18.
- ↑ Halpern 1994, p. 179.
- ↑ Boris N. Mironov, "The Myth of a Systemic Crisis in Russia after the Great Reforms of the 1860s–1870s", Russian Social Science Review (July/Aug 2009) 50#4 pp 36–48.; Boris N. Mironov, The Standard of Living and Revolutions in Imperial Russia, 1700–1917 (2012) Mironov, Boris Nikolaevich (2012). The Standard of Living and Revolutions in Russia, 1700-1917. Routledge. ISBN 978-0415608541.
- ↑ Kappeler, Andreas (2001). The Russian Empire: A Multi-Ethnic History. Routledge. pp. 92–114, 215–220. ISBN 978-0-582-23415-4.
- ↑ Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling (2008). Russia's Age of Serfdom 1649–1861. Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-0458-6.
- 1 2 Blum, Jerome (1961). Lord and Peasant in Russia from the Ninth to the Nineteenth Century. Princeton University Press.
- ↑ Hoch, Steven L. (1989). Serfdom and Social Control in Russia: Petrovskoe, a Village in Tambov. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-2263-4583-3.
- 1 2 Moon, David (1999). The Russian Peasantry 1600–1930: The World the Peasants Made. Longman. ISBN 978-0-582-09508-3.
- ↑ Chapman 2002, p. 9.
- ↑ Nafziger, Steven (2011). "Did Ivan's Vote Matter? The Political Economy of Local Governance in Tsarist Russia". European Review of Economic History. 15 (3): 393–441. doi:10.1017/S136149161100010X.
- ↑ Orlando Figes, "The Peasantry" in Vladimir IUrevich Cherniaev, ed. (1997). Critical Companion to the Russian Revolution, 1914–1921. Indiana UP. pp. 543–53. ISBN 0-2533-3333-4. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 5 July 2019.
- ↑ Steven Hoch, "Did Russia's Emancipated Serfs Really Pay Too Much for Too Little Land? Statistical Anomalies and Long-Tailed Distributions". Slavic Review (2004) 63#2 pp. 247–274.; Steven Nafziger, "Serfdom, emancipation, and economic development in Tsarist Russia" (Working paper, Williams College, 2012). online Archived 29 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
- 1 2 Christine D. Worobec, Peasant Russia: family and community in the post-emancipation period (1991).
- ↑ Louise McReynolds, News under Russia's Old Regime: The Development of a Mass-Circulation Press (1991).
- ↑ Dianina, Katia (2003). "Passage to Europe: Dostoevskii in the St. Petersburg Arcade". Slavic Review. 62 (2): 237–257. doi:10.2307/3185576. JSTOR 3185576. S2CID 163868977.
- ↑ Mironov, Boris N. (1991). "The Development of Literacy in Russia and the USSR from the Tenth to the Twentieth Centuries". History of Education Quarterly. 31 (2): 229–252. doi:10.2307/368437. JSTOR 368437. S2CID 144460404. esp p. 234.
- ↑ Franklin A. Walker, "Enlightenment and religion in Russian education in the reign of Tsar Alexander I." History of Education Quarterly 32.3 (1992): 343–360.
- ↑ Nicholas V. Riasanovsky, Russian Identities: A Historical Survey (2005) pp 112–18.
- ↑ Stephen Woodburn, "Reaction Reconsidered: Education and the State in Russia, 1825–1848." Consortium on Revolutionary Europe 1750–1850: Selected Papers 2000 pp 423–31.
- ↑ Hans Rogger, Russia in the Age of Modernisation and Revolution 1881 – 1917 (1983) p 126.
- ↑ Strauss, Johann. "Language and power in the late Ottoman Empire" (Chapter 7). In: Murphey, Rhoads (editor). Imperial Lineages and Legacies in the Eastern Mediterranean: Recording the Imprint of Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman Rule (Volume 18 of Birmingham Byzantine and Ottoman Studies). Routledge, 7 July 2016. ISBN 1-3171-1844-8, 9781317118442. Google Books PT196 Archived 26 December 2022 at the Wayback Machine.
Works cited
edit- Anderson, M. S. (1995) [1978]. Peter the Great. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-582-43746-3.
- Ascher, Abraham (2004). The Revolution of 1905: A Short History. Stanford University Press. ISBN 978-0-8047-5028-8.
- Catchpole, Brian (1974). A Map History of Russia. Heinemann Educational Publishers.
- Chapman, Tim (2002). Imperial Russia, 1801-1905. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-1345-7970-9. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
- Coleman, Heather J. (3 September 2014). Orthodox Christianity in Imperial Russia: A Source Book on Lived Religion. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-01318-7.
- Dowling, Timothy C. (2014). Russia at War: From the Mongol Conquest to Afghanistan, Chechnya, and Beyond [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-5988-4948-6. Archived from the original on 12 January 2023. Retrieved 12 May 2016.
- Dukes, Paul (1998). A History of Russia: Medieval, Modern, Contemporary, C. 882-1996. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-2096-8.
- Feldbrugge, Ferdinand J. M. (2 October 2017). A History of Russian Law: From Ancient Times to the Council Code (Ulozhenie) of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich of 1649. BRILL. p. 306. ISBN 978-90-04-35214-8.
- Freeze, Gregory L. (2002). Russia: A History (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 556. ISBN 978-0-1986-0511-9. Archived from the original on 26 March 2023. Retrieved 11 September 2017.
- General Staff, War Office (1914). Handbook of the Russian Army. London: Imperial War Museum.
- Hosking, Geoffrey (2011). Russia and the Russians: A History (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6740-6195-8. Archived from the original on 20 January 2023. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
- Moss, Walter G. (2003). A History of Russia Volume 1: To 1917. Anthem Press. ISBN 978-0-8572-8752-6.
- Halpern, Paul G. (1994). A Naval History of World War I. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 978-1-61251-172-6.
- Hughes, Lindsey (1998). Russia in the Age of Peter the Great. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. p. 640. ISBN 978-0-3000-8266-1. OL 358704M.
- Lieven, Dominic C. B., ed. (2006). The Cambridge History of Russia. Vol. II, Imperial Russia, 1689–1917. Cambridge University Press.
- Lieven, Dominic C. B. (2015). The End of Tsarist Russia: The March to World War I and Revolution. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-1431-0955-6. Archived from the original on 27 February 2024. Retrieved 10 January 2023.
- Lieven, Dominic (2021). "The Russian Empire (1453–1917)". In Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, Christopher Alan; Scheidel, Walter (eds.). The Oxford World History of Empire. Oxford University Press. pp. 964–988. ISBN 978-0-19-753276-8.
- Mayzel, Matitiahu (1975). "The Formation of the Russian General Staff. 1880-1917. A Social Study". Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique. 16 (3/4): 297–321. doi:10.3406/cmr.1975.1241. JSTOR 20169731.
- McMeekin, Sean (2011). The Russian Origins of the First World War. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-6740-6210-8. Archived from the original on 7 January 2023. Retrieved 10 January 2023.
- Middleton, John (1 June 2015). "Russian dynasties". World Monarchies and Dynasties. Routledge. pp. 805–810. ISBN 978-1-317-45157-0.
- Papastratigakis, Nicholas (2011). Russian Imperialism and Naval Power: Military Strategy and the Build-Up to the Russo-Japanese War. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-8488-5691-2.
- Pipes, Richard (1974). Russia under the Old Regime. New York: Scribner. ISBN 978-0-6841-4041-4.
- Pipes, Richard (2011). A Concise History of the Russian Revolution. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-3077-8858-0. Archived from the original on 12 January 2023. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
- Raeff, Marc (1984). Understanding Imperial Russia: State and Society in the Old Regime. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-05843-8.
- Reese, Roger R. (2019). The Imperial Russian Army in Peace, War, and Revolution, 1856-1917. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2860-5.
- Sanborn, Joshua A. (2014). Imperial Apocalypse: The Great War and the Destruction of the Russian Empire. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1996-4205-2. Archived from the original on 10 January 2023. Retrieved 11 January 2023.
- Seton-Watson, Hugh (1967). The Russian empire 1801–1917. Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-1982-2103-7. OL 18540198M.
- Stavrou, Theofanis G. (1969). Russia Under the Last Tsar. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-0514-9.
- Stein, Howard F. (December 1976). "Russian Nationalism and the Divided Soul of the Westernizers and Slavophiles". Ethos. 4 (4): 403–438. doi:10.1525/eth.1976.4.4.02a00010.
- Thompson, John M. (2004). "Duma". In Millar, James R. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Russian History. Macmillan Reference USA. pp. 415–416. ISBN 978-0-02-865694-6.
- Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2014). World War I: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection [5 volumes]: The Definitive Encyclopedia and Document Collection. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-8510-9965-8. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2019). World War I: A Country-by-Country Guide. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-4408-6369-1. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2022.
- Stone, David R. (2021). The Russian Army in the Great War: The Eastern Front, 1914–1917. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-7006-3308-1.
- Vinogradov, Sergei E. (1998). "Battleship Development in Russia from 1905 to 1917". Warship International. 35 (3): 267–90. JSTOR 44892563.
- Waldron, Peter (1997). The End of Imperial Russia, 1855–1917. European History in Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25483-5. ISBN 978-0-333-60168-6.
- Westwood, J. N. (1994). Russian Naval Construction, 1905–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-349-12458-9.
- Williams, Beryl (December 1994). "The concept of the first Duma: Russia 1905–1906". Parliaments, Estates and Representation. 14 (2): 149–158. doi:10.1080/02606755.1994.9525857.
Further reading
editSurveys
edit- Ascher, Abraham. Russia: A Short History (2011)
- Kamenskii, Aleksandr B. The Russian Empire in the Eighteenth Century: Searching for a Place in the World (1997) . xii. 307 pp. A synthesis of much Western and Russian scholarship.
- Lieven, Dominic C. B. Empire; The Russian Empire and Its Rivals (Yale University Press, 2001)
- Lincoln, W. Bruce. The Romanovs: Autocrats of All the Russias (1983), narrative history
- Longley, David (2000). The Longman Companion to Imperial Russia, 1689–1917. New York: Longman Publishing Group. p. 496. ISBN 978-0-5823-1990-5.
- McKenzie, David & Michael W. Curran. A History of Russia, the Soviet Union, and Beyond. 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2001. ISBN 0-5345-8698-8.
- Pares, Bernard. A history of Russia (1947) pp 221–537, online
- Perrie, Maureen, ed. (2006). The Cambridge History of Russia. Vol. I, From Early Rus' to 1689. Cambridge University Press.
- Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. online
- Suny, Ronald Grigor, ed. (2006). The Cambridge History of Russia. Vol. III, The Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
- Ziegler, Charles E. The History of Russia (Greenwood Press, 1999) online edition
Geography, topical maps
edit- Barnes, Ian. Restless Empire: A Historical Atlas of Russia (2015), copies of historic maps
- Channon, John, and Robert Hudson. The Penguin historical atlas of Russia (Viking, 1995), new topical maps.
- Chew, Allen F. An atlas of Russian history: eleven centuries of changing borders (Yale University Press, 1970), new topical maps.
- Gilbert, Martin. Atlas of Russian history (Oxford University Press, 1993), new topical maps.
- Parker, William Henry. An historical geography of Russia (Aldine, 1968).
1801–1917
edit- Manning, Roberta Thompson (1982). The Crisis of the Old Order in Russia: Gentry and Government. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-6910-5349-9. OL 3785581M.
- Pares, Bernard (1939). The Fall of the Russian Monarchy. Phoenix. pp. 94–143. OCLC 45990840. OL 3532000M.
- Westwood, J. N. (2002). Endurance and Endeavour: Russian History 1812–2001 (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1992-4617-5. OL 3569059M.
Military and foreign relations
edit- Adams, Michael. Napoleon and Russia (2006).
- Englund, Peter (2002). The Battle That Shook Europe: Poltava and the Birth of the Russian Empire. New York: I. B. Tauris. p. 288. ISBN 978-1-8606-4847-2.
- Fuller, William C. Strategy and Power in Russia 1600–1914 (1998); military strategy
- Gatrell, Peter. "Tsarist Russia at War: The View from Above, 1914 – February 1917." Journal of Modern History 87#3 (2015): 668–700.
- Lieven, Dominic C. B. Russia and the Origins of the First World War (1983).
- Lieven, Dominic C. B. (2011). Russia Against Napoleon: The True Story of the Campaigns of War and Peace. Penguin Books.
- LeDonne, John P. The Russian empire and the world, 1700–1917: The geopolitics of expansion and containment (1997).
- Neumann, Iver B. "Russia as a great power, 1815–2007." Journal of International Relations and Development 11#2 (2008): 128–51. online Archived 18 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- Saul, Norman E. Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Foreign Policy (2014)
- Stone, David. A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya
Economic, social, and ethnic history
edit- Christian, David. A History of Russia, Central Asia and Mongolia. Vol. 1: Inner Eurasia from Prehistory to the Mongol Empire. (Blackwell, 1998). ISBN 0-6312-0814-3.
- De Madariaga, Isabel. Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great (2002), comprehensive topical survey
- Dixon, Simon (1999). The Modernisation of Russia, 1676–1825. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 288. ISBN 978-0-5213-7100-1.
- Etkind, Alexander. Internal Colonization: Russia's Imperial Experience (Polity Press, 2011); discussion of serfdom, the peasant commune, etc.
- Franklin, Simon, and Bowers, Katherine (eds). Information and Empire: Mechanisms of Communication in Russia, 1600–1850 (Open Book Publishers, 2017) online Archived 5 December 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- Freeze, Gregory L. From Supplication to Revolution: A Documentary Social History of Imperial Russia (1988)
- Kappeler, Andreas (2001). The Russian Empire: A Multi-Ethnic History. New York: Longman. p. 480. ISBN 978-0-5822-3415-4.
- Milward, Alan S. and S. B. Saul. The Development of the Economies of Continental Europe: 1850–1914 (1977) pp. 365–425
- Milward, Alan S. and S. B. Saul. The Economic Development of Continental Europe 1780–1870 (2nd ed. 1979), 552 pp
- Mironov, Boris N.; Eklof, Ben (2000). The Social History of Imperial Russia, 1700–1917. Vol. 1. Westview Press.
- Mironov, Boris N.; Eklof, Ben (2000). The Social History of Imperial Russia, 1700–1917. Vol. 2: Patterns of State Building. Westview Press.
- Mironov, Boris N. (2012). The Standard of Living and Revolutions in Imperial Russia, 1700–1917. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-60854-1.
- Mironov, Boris N. (2010) "Wages and Prices in Imperial Russia, 1703–1913", Russian Review (Jan 2010) 69#1 pp. 47–72, with 13 tables and 3 charts online
- Moon, David (1999). The Russian Peasantry 1600–1930: The World the Peasants Made. Boston: Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0-5820-9508-3. 396 pp.
- Stolberg, Eva-Maria. (2004) "The Siberian Frontier and Russia's Position in World History", Review: A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center 27#3 pp. 243–67
- Wirtschafter, Elise Kimerling. Russia's age of serfdom 1649–1861 (2008).
Historiography and memory
edit- Burbank, Jane, and David L. Ransel, eds. Imperial Russia: new histories for the Empire (Indiana University Press, 1998)
- Cracraft, James. ed. Major Problems in the History of Imperial Russia (1993)
- Hellie, Richard. "The structure of modern Russian history: Toward a dynamic model." Russian History 4.1 (1977): 1–22. Online Archived 5 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine
- Lieven, Dominic C.B. Empire: The Russian empire and its rivals (Yale University Press, 2002), compares Russian with British, Habsburg & Ottoman empires.
- Kuzio, Taras. "Historiography and national identity among the Eastern Slavs: towards a new framework." National Identities (2001) 3#2 pp. 109–32.
- Olson, Gust, and Aleksei I. Miller. "Between Local and Inter-Imperial: Russian Imperial History in Search of Scope and Paradigm." Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History (2004) 5#1 pp. 7–26.
- Sanders, Thomas, ed. Historiography of imperial Russia: The profession and writing of history in a multinational state (ME Sharpe, 1999)
- Smith, Steve. "Writing the History of the Russian Revolution after the Fall of Communism." Europe‐Asia Studies (1994) 46#4 pp. 563–78.
- Suny, Ronald Grigor. "Rehabilitating Tsarism: The Imperial Russian State and Its Historians. A Review Article" Comparative Studies in Society and History 31#1 (1989) pp. 168–79 online Archived 28 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine
- Suny, Ronald Grigor (2001). "The empire strikes out: Imperial Russia, 'national' identity, and theories of empire". In Holquist, Peter; Suny, Ronald Grigor; Martin, Terry (eds.). A State of Nations: Empire and Nation-Making in the Age of Lenin and Stalin. Oxford University Press. pp. 23–66.
Primary sources
edit- Golder, Frank Alfred. Documents Of Russian History 1914–1917 (1927), 680pp online
- Kennard, Howard Percy, and Netta Peacock, eds. The Russian Year-book: Volume 2 1912 (London, 1912) full text in English
External links
edit
Media related to Russian Empire at Wikimedia Commons
Russian Empire travel guide from Wikivoyage- Film «Moscow clad in snow», 00:07:22, 1908 on YouTube
- The Empire that was Russia: color photographs from Library of Congress