 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4,816 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 30 June 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Submission declined on 29 June 2026 by Gurkubondinn (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.
Declined by Gurkubondinn 22 days ago.LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:
Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. | |
Comment: Thanks for rewriting the article, that dealt with the AI issue, it is appreciated. Next inter-related hurdles: notability and corporate depth. Basically you now need to improve the independent sources to show that depth, see WP:NORG and see the two sections on corporate depth and trivia. Some elements (not many) have no sources and that should be found too, this can be sourced via the company website if necessary (but secondary sources are still preferred). ChrysGalley (talk) 19:05, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
- Comment: This is LLM-generated. Removing some of the obvious tell-tale signs of the problem does not fix the problem. ‑‑gurkubondinn 17:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
| Type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Artificial intelligence |
| Founded | 2022 |
| Founders | Ali Ansari |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California , United States |
Key people |
|
| Website | micro1 |
micro1 is an American artificial intelligence data company headquartered in San Francisco, California.[1] The company provides training datasets and evaluation services to AI laboratories and robotics companies. It began as a technical recruitment platform before shifting to data annotation in 2025.[2]
History
editmicro1 was founded in 2022 by Ali Ansari, a student at UC Berkeley.[2] The company initially operated as Zara, a recruitment tool using large language models to screen software engineering candidates.[2][3]
In early 2025, micro1 pivoted to data labeling after a data firm hired it to handle recruitment for annotation projects.[3] Its annual revenue grew from $7 million to $100 million within a year, alongside competitors Mercor and Surge AI.[2]
In September 2025, micro1 raised $35 million in Series A funding led by 01 Advisors at a $500 million valuation.[2] Adam Bain of 01 Advisors joined the board.[2] In April 2026, Forbes named the company to its inaugural AI 50 "Brink List."[1]
Operations
editmicro1 operates in three main areas:
- Data annotation: The company contracts subject matter experts in software development, legal research, and medicine to generate and evaluate training data for AI models.[2] It uses Zara to recruit and screen these contractors.[2]
- Enterprise evaluation: micro1 provides testing and validation services for Fortune 1000 companies building autonomous agents for internal use in legal analysis, financial operations, and workflow tasks.[2]
- Robotics data: The company collects physical demonstration data for robotics training.[2] It distributes smart glasses kits to contributors who record household tasks, creating datasets for robotic learning.[3][4]
micro1 also licenses anonymized corporate data from businesses to AI labs for training autonomous agents.[5][6]
See also
editReferences
edit- 1 2 Chierchio, Sofia; Shrivastava, Rashi (April 16, 2026). "The AI 50 Brink List". Forbes. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Kene-Okafor, Tage (December 4, 2025). "Micro1, a Scale AI competitor, touts crossing $100M ARR". TechCrunch. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
- 1 2 3 Tong, Anna (December 4, 2025). "This 24 Year Old Built A Multibillion-Dollar AI Training Empire In Eight Months". Forbes. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
- ↑ Rollet, Charles (October 2025). "You can now get paid to fold your laundry, as long as you're willing to film it". Business Insider. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
- ↑ "micro1". micro1.ai. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
- ↑ "Own a Company? AI Labs Are Paying Up to $1M a Year for Your Workflow Data". AI Trainer News. June 26, 2026. Retrieved July 2, 2026.
Category:Artificial intelligence companies Category:Data companies Category:Privately held companies based in San Francisco
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.