Arstechnica: eBay execs sent roaches and “bloody pig mask” to harass journalists, feds say

edit

Not sure how or where to include this but is probably important, they were executives when this allegedly happened

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 21:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

@John Cummings: I added it to EBay#2010s in the latest three edits. Feel free to add refs, improve, etc. Notrium (talk) 21:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Notrium:. It should be in the controversies section and it needs to be expanded TheMemeMonarch (talk) 01:47, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
@TheMemeMonarch: my view is that "Controversy and criticism" would be for cases of somebody outside Ebay (notably) criticizing Ebay. Are you aware of WP:CRITS? It seems to me we should actually get rid of the criticism section we currently have. Notrium (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Expand it all you want, though. Notrium (talk) 01:55, 28 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
It is shameful that while the "scandal" claims, correctly, the then CEO has not been criminally charged, his order to his subordinate to "take [the journalist] down" isn't mentioned! It's clearly notable and on record. I note (editorialize) that ebay executives engaged in domestic terrorism and actually went so far at to attempt to break-in to the journalist's house. The ex-CEO claims his communication has been taken out of context and he never told his staff to break the law. The problem with that is that it is not only his job to make sure he communicates clearly, but to follow-up to make sure it is understood and acted upon correctly. He is defendant in a civil suit brought by eBay's victims.174.130.71.156 (talk) 09:46, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

edit

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rt2510 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Rt2510 (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disamb song

edit

Maybe we should move it to See also or create In popular culture section instead. Evil Freethinker (talk) 16:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Criticisms"

edit

Time to do some housekeeping, especially since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of eBay is happening. First of all, we should not have a "Criticisms and controversy" section at all, per WP:CSECTION: sections such as "Criticisms and controversies" are generally inappropriate. Given that we have one, this one is full of questionable stuff, some of it now almost two decades old. For example, "Requirement to use PayPal". eBay hasn't owned PayPal for a decade now, and the "criticism" is 17 years stale. "Buy.com" as a controversy? That was 16 years ago; are people still pissed? "2010 survey criticizing eBay customer service". Obviously stale. "Overcharging fees": 13 years stale. "Low tax rate paid in the United Kingdom": how is this a controversy if eBay is adhering to UK law? Oh, there was a security breach a decade ago. "Sale of controversial items" shouldn't even be in there even if we do have this section. "Stalking scandal" deserves its own section; it's pretty unique. Oh, 14 years ago eBay did something silly and banned a silly board game and someone decided it was "pandering to political correctness"...

Let's nuke the whole section. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Jpgordon You make some fair points, but I disagree with some of your analysis. First of all, "it happened decades ago" is not a reason in itself to remove anything. Wikipedia documents history. But it is a reason to distill some things down and move them into their appropriate historical context. Use of PayPal was a significant deal that shaped a lot of the business of both companies in their early days. Rate of tax paid is a controversy because, as sources show, it attracted criticism. The legality of their tax arrangements wasn't the issue, and tax avoidance by multinational companies remains an ongoing controversial topic. Security breaches of online businesses is always a big deal, so the article shouldn't be pretending it's never happened at eBay. Escape Orbit (Talk) 06:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Who said it should pretend anything? But that's a good example of things that should be rolled into the article in the appropriate place (perhaps in a discussion of eBay's technology?) rather than stuck into a list of "criticisms and controversies"; how is it a controversy that someone had a security breach? (And at this point, I wonder what companies haven't had security breaches?) Is eBay somehow special that it some people don't think it's paying enough taxes, or is that just a blanket statement that could be put in absolutely any multinational's article? Anything of interest here should be integrated into the article as a whole, as spelled out in WP:CSECTION. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 02:26, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

OK, I did some major trimming here. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 15:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

LLM usage

edit

EBay has started using LLMs, this needs a section in the time line. It has impacted their customer service and they are offering this LLM service to vendors, so it's in many of the ads, too. 173.222.1.191 (talk) 04:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Any reliable sources regarding such claims? A09|(talk) 10:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fees

edit

Ebay UK has abolished "seller" fees and replaced them with "buyer protection" fees, probably to better compete with Vinted etc. cagliost (talk) 08:21, 20 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 28 December 2025

edit

The page itself is not fully considered secured by vandalism. Someone must do this act right now. MainRecline (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Improving sourcing in the History section

edit

Hello! As part of my work for the communications firm Axicom, I have been asked by eBay to request updates to this article. If independent editors have any questions about my relationship with either company, I'm happy to answer those below or on my user Talk page.

With that disclosure out of the way, I'll pose my first request. I noticed that a few passages in the 2010s and 2020s parts of the History section are substantiated solely by press releases. As I understand it, Wikipedia prefers secondary sources over primary ones, so I've put together some fresh citations that I hope will shore up these passages:

  • In October 2012, eBay launched an international shipping partnership with Pitney Bowes whereby a seller of an item to be shipped internationally can send the item to a Pitney Bowes facility in their home country, which then forwards it to the international buyer, taking care of all international shipping requirements.[1][2]
  • In January 2015, eBay acquired Vivanuncios, a classified advertising website in Mexico.[3]
  • In May 2022, eBay acquired a stake in Funko and became the preferred secondary marketplace for Funko.[4][5]
  • In August 2022, the company acquired the myFitment group of companies, specializing in online sales of automotive and powersports parts and accessories.[6][7]

References

  1. "Pitney Bowes, turning 100, shifts to ecommerce as its trusted postage meter recedes into the past". Hartford Courant. October 12, 2020. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  2. Straight, Brian (November 2, 2022). "Pitney Bowes, eBay extend cross-border shipping partnership". Freight Waves. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  3. Steiner, Ina (January 29, 2015). "eBay Adds Another Classifieds Site to Its Portfolio". eCommerceBytes. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  4. Whitten, Sarah (May 5, 2022). "Bob Iger, eBay, sports agent Rich Paul, Chernin Group team up to buy 25% stake in toy maker Funko". CNBC. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  5. Medina, Anthony (July 4, 2022). "Funko's new exclusive drops on eBay show how vital secondary market hype is for collectible manufacturers — even if they never see a dime of revenue from resale". Business Insider. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  6. "Online Auto Parts Battle Revs Up With eBay's myFitment Buy". PYMNTS. August 24, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2026.
  7. Steiner, Ina (August 23, 2022). "eBay Acquires Tool to Help Determine Auto Parts Compatibility". eCommerceBytes. Retrieved January 7, 2026.

Not all of these new sources are top-tier, but they're the best ones I could find. I'll now step back and let independent editors review. Thanks! JN at Axicom (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done PK650 (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Adding sentence to the article introduction

edit

Hello again, I'm back with another short request. I was wondering if it would be possible to add a sentence about the size and character of eBay's seller ecosystem to the article's introduction. The section already contains information about how many buyers are on the platform and how much money moves through it in a given year, so I thought a brief sentence about sellers might serve as useful additional context.

Here's my proposed addition. It's the introduction precisely as-is with one new sentence about sellers, which I've highlighted, and a paragraph break that I think makes the section a touch more readable:

I hope that independent editors find my proposed addition helpful. Thanks, JN at Axicom (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

  • Is there a more recent count of sellers? Is there one not based on an eBay press release? Also, I don't see the relevance of the Reuters article, other than it mentions individuals and small businesses, which the next paragraph leads with already. Another hint -- avoid marketing speak completely. I know it's hard! "eBay's marketplace features approx. 17 million sellers" -- no, it doesn't feature all those sellers. Just the facts. As of so and so date, eBay has 17 million sellers. Or something like that. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 21:28, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Hey, User:jpgordon! I appreciate the feedback. First, I'll provide context on a couple of editorial decisions I made. You're the non-COI editor, so please make your own determination, but perhaps it'll help if I explain myself a little bit.
    The Inc. Magazine piece is the best secondary source I could find that has a firm number (17 million, as of 2021) for the size of the seller ecosystem. There are other outlets—for example, this digital marketing blog— that say eBay has about 18.3 million sellers circa now, but those don't strike me as credible sources, even if the number is probably more or less correct.
    The Reuters article is there to substantiate the claim about the composition of the ecosystem (i.e. it's made up of individuals and small businesses). I mentioned "small businesses" specifically because I believe they're a meaningfully distinct seller category, as opposed to the more generic "companies" mentioned in the following paragraph.
    With all that said, here's a lightly revised version of the sentence:
    As of 2021, eBay's marketplace has approximately 17 million sellers[1] including individuals and small businesses.[2]
    Let me know what you think. Thanks again, JN at Axicom (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    But it's individuals, small businesses, and also medium and large businesses -- all of which we say in the next paragraph. "eBay can be used by individuals, companies and governments to purchase and sell..." Always best to keep the opening paragraph tight and concise. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:24, 5 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    User:jpgordon: I see your point. Would you be okay with just including the 2021 seller figure? Something like this:
    As of 2021, eBay's marketplace has approximately 17 million sellers[1]
    Thanks for being patient with me here. I appreciate your explanations. JN at Axicom (talk) 00:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I wonder if we can find similar data to parallel the scope of the data presented for buyers? That is, "In 2021, eBay had 17 million sellers, N% of which were in the United States?" Consolidating the number-of-sellers and number-of-buyers information would be pretty tidy. Isn't that sort of information available in eBay's annual reports? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 01:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    User:Jpgordon: Unfortunately, I'm not sure that data is available. Or at least it's not publicly reported. I think the best reliable source I can provide is that 2021 seller figure. JN at Axicom (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Yeah, the 2021 10-K seems to be the most recent accounting of the number of sellers, and it doesn't have a breakdown by region. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    User:Jpgordon: Yeah, these 10-Ks, outside of some essential details, can be a bit inconsistent in terms of what kind of information they contain. So are you okay adding that one brief sentence? Thank you, again, for your help. I really appreciate it! JN at Axicom (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    I've put in the 17 million number, and the actual source your reference was citing. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 05:52, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
    User:Jpgordon: appreciate the help with this, thank you! JN at Axicom (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. 1 2 Burba, Anabel (July 12, 2024). "eBay Is Fronting (a Lot of) Cash to Sellers. Here's What You Need to Know". Inc. Magazine. Retrieved January 15, 2026.
  2. McLymore, Arriana; Reid, Helen (August 29, 2025). "How will the end of the de minimis exemption impact US shoppers and businesses?". Reuters. Retrieved January 15, 2026.

Adding content to 2020s subsection

edit

Hey there, I would like to ask editors to consider adding to the 2020s subsection of the History. I've composed a draft, which includes new passages about notable acquisitions the company has made over the past few years, as well as some company developments that have received coverage in reliable sources. I invite independent editors to review my draft by clicking the dropdown below. All highlighted content is new; all unhighlighted content is exactly as it appears on the page right now.

My hope is that this draft is up to snuff, but if it's not, please leave me a comment below and I will try to adjust the content so that it better fits community standards. Thanks! JN at Axicom (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reply 20-MAY-2026

edit

🔼  Clarification requested  

  • EBay's authenticity guarantee needs additional information. Specifically how, and in what way, the individual customer who makes use of this service receives their renumeration if that authenticty is determined not to be the case after the purchased item is paid for. Any other peculiarties or requirements of the authenticity guarantee program ought to be delineated.
  • To merit inclusion in the article, the individual companies and or services that EBay launches, acquires, or otherwise collaborates with should be independently notable in Wikipedia. To that end, kindly provide the WikiLinks for the companies and services mentioned in the requested text.
  • When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{Edit COI}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=y to |ans=n.

Thank you! Regards,  Spintendo  09:50, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply