test
Ain't got nothing. Just keeping this from vanishing for the time being.
Forty-two percent of Americans now say same sex couples should be allowed to legally marry, a new CBS News/New York Times poll finds. That's up nine points from last month, when 33 percent supported legalizing same sex marriage.
Support for same sex marriage is now at its highest point since CBS News starting asking about it in 2004.
Twenty-eight percent say same sex couples should have no legal recognition – down from 35 percent in March – while 25 percent support civil unions, but not marriage, for gay couples.
As has historically been the case on this issue, liberals are more likely to support same sex marriage. Sixty-nine percent support the idea, while conservatives generally favor either civil unions (28 percent) or no legal recognition (44 percent).
Jackson had a much smaller crowd than the thousands he had hoped for. As the rally began, there were well under 100 people; by the end there may have been close to 200.
The same combination of misinformation and willful deception is being rolled out this year, led by Tony Perkins and the Family Research Council. One alert to its members on March 31 claimed that a federal hate crimes law “could lead to the criminalization of the biblical view of homosexuality in sermons and elsewhere.” Said Perkins:“A ‘hate crimes’ law is really a ‘thought crime’ law that punishes a person’s beliefs – part of the Left’s intolerant agenda to silence the voice of Christians and Conservatives in America and eliminate moral restraint.”
Of course, that's about as untrue as things can get. I guess bearing false witness is fine if it's against gay people.
Remember, bias crime laws aren't about the status of the victim, but the motive of the perpetrator. A straight person can be gay bashed, and it would still be a bias crime.
Not to mention that the issue of speech versus conduct has been settle twice: once by the SCOTUS in 1993 (Wisconsin v Mitchell), and again, by the law itself which says in no uncertain terms:"Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to prohibit any expressive conduct protected from legal prohibition by, or any activities protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses of, the First Amendment to the Constitution."
I guess this reveals the haters true colors: they think that killing gays should be free speech.
Here's a bit of trivia for you guys.
Back in the day, both the NAACP and organizations like the Association of Southern Women to Prevent Lynching proposed federal anti-lynching legislation in the early part of the last century. This was, of course, opposed by Southern states who said that the law was infringing on their sovereignty (they pointed out that they already had anti-lynching legislation - it was just rarely enforced). Funny thing though, to justify being against it, they said this:Lynching is but murder; and if...we can by Federal statue punish the crime of lynching perpetrated by individuals composing a mob, there is no escape from the conclusion that by Federal statute we can extend the jurisdiction of the Federal Government into all the states and against all crimes affecting, life, liberty, or property of citizens of the various states."
That's right, the laughably flimsy, "all crimes are hate crimes" was used to kill things like the Dyer Bill and other federal anti-lynching legislation.
Also, in the early 1980s, in Northern Idaho, white racist churches like Richard Butler's Church of Jesus Christ-Christian set up shop and their followers began harassing locals and businesses. When bias crime laws were considered, guess what they said? That's right, they claimed that such a thing would infringe on their freedom of speech and religion.
Sound familiar?
That's the good news for now.










