In the context of wide ranging reforms of the Australian Federal Family Law Act, a window seems to have opened for legal recognition of some forms of non-monogamy.
Please excuse the headline and general tone of the article: the Herald Sun is a shameless tabloid rag. But as I was perusing it for lulz over a beer today, the sentence I've bolded below leapt out at me.
( Sting for love cheats with Family Law Act reformsCollapse )But legal experts warn the amended Act - passed in the Senate on Monday - opens the definition of a de facto couple to wide interpretation.
The legislation describes a de facto relationship as an opposite-sex or same-sex couple living together on a "genuine domestic basis".
Yet it also stipulates
a de facto alliance can exist even if one of the partners is legally married to somebody else or in another de facto relationship.( onoes!!Collapse ) If that is really spelled out in the Act - and I'll be downloading a copy before I take the Ferald Scum's word for it - then maybe it's not accidental at all. Because those words pretty specifically spell out "not monogamy" to me; perhaps not polyfamilies per se, but a fairly explicit recognition that an individual can have more than one "genuine" relationship.
And if this is the same amendment that passed the Senate on the same day, changing the meaning of the term "de facto"
to include same-sex partners in 68 other Acts, and polyfamilies are able to write and sign their own
binding financial and domestic agreements ...
... does this suddenly make Australia the world's first poly-friendly jurisdiction?
X-posted to polyamory, polyamory_aus