Halo Effect in Subjective Performance Evaluation Bias
PDF
PDF

Keywords

Halo Effect - Subjective Performance Evaluation

How to Cite

Yustina, A. I., & Gudono, G. (2017). Halo Effect in Subjective Performance Evaluation Bias. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 19(3), 393-404. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v19i3.621
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study aimed not only to examine the effect of the objective measure and controllability on subjective performance evaluation but also to prove empirically the halo effect phenomenon which is present in the evaluation process when evaluators are faced with two or more different measurement dimensions. This study used a 2x2 factorial web-based experiment involving 62 undergraduate students and 77 sales managers in the Telecommunications industry. The results reveal the subjective performance evaluation manager is directly influenced by objective measurement based on sales performance. Subjective evaluation of performance evaluator will be high when the objective performance information managers showed a high score and vice versa. The level of controllability affects undergraduate students in conducting subjective performance rating. This evidence suggests that the two subjects of this research using their discretion in conducting the performance appraisal rating. Halo effect is proven to have high correlation with two different dimensions of performance measurement.


References

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., & Murphy, K. J., 1994, ‘Subjective Perormance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 1125-1156.

Bechger, T. M., Maris, G., & Hsiao, Y. P., 2010, ‘Detecting Halo Effect in Performance-Based Examinations’, Applied Psychological Measurement, 34(8), 607-619.

Belzer, W. K. & Sulsky, L. M., 1992, ‘Halo and Performance Appraisal Research: A Critical Examination’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(6), 975-985.

Bellavance F., Landry, S., & Schiehll, E, 2013, ‘Procedural Justice in Managerial Performance Evaluation: Effect of Subjectivity, Relationship Quality, and Voice Opportunity’, The British Accounting Review, 45, 149-166.

Bernardin, H. J., and Beatty, R. W., 1984, Performance Appraisal: Assesing Human Behavior at Work, Boston, Kent.