Tags: lgbt

The Difference Blog

Queer @ Work

Gay men and women have many challenges in the workplace. Some are similar; some are different. Chung and Harmon (1994) suggest that gay men are more likely to be interested in traditionally feminine careers than straight men, although they found that masculinity/femininity was not a predictor (as determined by BSRI). Adams et al (2005) did not find that Latino gay and lesbian youth felt restrictions on their career choices based on either their gender or sexual orientation.

Nam Cam Trau and Härtel (2004) suggest that the extra energy needed by gay men to explore and consolidate their gay identity takes away time that straight men have available to put towards career exploration. In addition, they suggest that the lack of a female partner at business social events makes personal bonding with those in a position to help these men advance difficult. Nam Cam Tau and Härtel feel that these are challenges that probably face lesbians as well. However, this study included both out and closeted gay men. Peplau and Fingerhut (2004) work from the assumption of openness in their study of lesbian workplace issues. They find that stereotypes about lesbians depict them as more competent and committed workers than their straight counterparts.



In the 1995 movie Jeffrey, Nathan Lane's character "Father Dan" says: "I'm a Catholic priest. Historically, that falls somewhere between chorus boy and florist." The idea of traditionally gay careers is well established (at least for men). However, given the general artifact of lesbian invisibility, I was very surprised by Peplau and Fingerhut's results based on a survey of heterosexual undergraduates. In the study, the students were given written examples of a "straight woman" and a "lesbian", but in real life, that distinction is rarely so straightforward.

Another issue I had with the studies used today was the sample sizes. Adams interviewed eight people; Nam Cam Trau and Härtel interviewed five. Finding a reasonable sample of willing participants for gay and lesbian studies is a constant issue.
The Difference Blog

Sexuality and mental rotation

Judy Skatssoon (6/4/2007), writing for news.com.au, says that the University of Warwick has "dealt heterosexual women a final indignity." Skatssoon is referring to research by Michael Tlauka that found differences in mental rotation ability, with straight men scoring the highest while straight women scored the lowest. However, although the news articles attribute this work to Tlauka, the paper published in April's Archives of Sexual Behavior was published by Maylor et al (2007).

Tlauka et al (2005) tested men and women with paper and computer maps in a virtual store, and found that men required less time and made fewer mistakes than their female counterparts. Martin et al's 2007 review of the effect of testosterone and estrogen finds that gender differences in spatial ability are "large and robust."



Mental rotation tasks (MRT) are probably one of my favorite topics because they really do seem to consistently break down by gender. The fact that Maylor et al found that ability appeared to vary by sexuality (determined by self-identification, on an internet survey) continues to tie sexuality and gender together in a way that I politically deny and inwardly fear may be true. Research that classifies by sexuality often seems to suggest that lesbians are more "manly" and gay men more "womanly" than their straight counterparts. I don't know what to make of it, but it feels to me as if they are asking the wrong questions.
The Difference Blog

Lesbian Sheep

Gender roles in heterosexual dating have been extensively studied. For example, Karl Grammer (1990) suggests that males use body language to signal dominance, whereas women's body language indicates both submission and "bodily self-presentation." Grammer (2000) points out ten years later that women seem to be in control of opposite-sex interactions, despite this role-play of submission.

Studies of gender roles in same-sex dating are rarer. Klinkenberg and Rose (1994) studied "dating scripts" for lesbians vs. gays, and found that "talk/laugh/joke" was an item mentioned by almost all participants, with no gender differences. However, the men's scripts mentioned only "self-initiated actions", whereas the several of the women's scripts mentioned "partner-initiated actions (e.g. 'partner picked me up')." Sergios and Cody (1985) found that "social assertiveness" had no effect on how likely a gay man was to request a subsequent date; only "physical attractiveness" influenced how much the subject "liked" their partner in this experiment.



It is tempting to use gay and lesbian experiences to confirm stereotypes about gendered behavior in dating. This weekend a friend told me about the concept of "lesbian sheep": "if you are a female sheep, what you do to solicit sex is stand still". This has led to "lesbian sheep" being a term to refer to any potentially sexual relationship where both parties wait for the other to act. This term is overwhelmingly used for female-female relationships, but not exclusively so. In my personal (and therefore meaningless) experience, I'd like to say that not all men know how to make the first move either (and I don't just mean me).
The Difference Blog

The Homo Hypothalamus

The Times Online (UK) reports that PETA, with the support of tennis star Martina Navratilova is protesting research on "male-oriented" rams by researcher Charles Roselli. PETA claims that Roselli is trying to turn gay sheep straight, but in an interview with The Next Hurrah, Roselli says he finds accusations that he is looking for a cure for homosexuality "appalling and offensive."

In many ways, Roselli's research is reminiscent of Simon LeVay's (1991) findings about the human hypothalamus. The correlation drawn in both is that the same-sex orientation may be related to a nucleus that is closer to the female average than the male average.



LGBT bloggers are in an uproar, convinced that screening and aborting of homosexual babies is on the doorstep. I'm dubious, myself, but largely because I tend to disbelieve anything endorsed by PETA, and The Next Hurrah's piece sort of sums up my feelings on that. I wasn't sure that this story was really appropriate to Difference Blog, but considering how much time I spend documenting other differences between male-average and female-average brains, this really is right down my alley. I have a hard time arguing that research is a bad thing. Honestly, I think that designer babies are so far in the future that it's useless to extrapolate current social attitudes to their application.