Distributing candies among children sounds simple, right? But what if there’s a limit on how many candies each child can get? Let’s break down this classic combinatorial problem and solve it efficiently!
Problem Statement
You are given two positive integers:
-
n
= total candies -
limit
= maximum candies any child can receive
Goal: Find the total number of ways to distribute n
candies among 3 children such that no child gets more than limit
candies.
Example
- Input: n = 5, limit = 2
- Output: 3
- Explanation: Valid distributions are (1, 2, 2), (2, 1, 2), and (2, 2, 1).
Step 1: Understand the Basics (Stars and Bars) ⭐✨
Without any limit, the problem reduces to distributing n
identical candies into 3 children (bins), which can be done in:
Total ways = C(n + 3 - 1, 3 - 1) = C(n + 2, 2)
Here, C(a, b)
is the binomial coefficient "a choose b".
This formula comes from the Stars and Bars theorem:
Imagine n
stars (candies) separated by 2 bars (dividers) that partition candies between the 3 children.
Step 2: Add the Limit Constraint Using Inclusion-Exclusion Principle 🔍
We must exclude all distributions where any child has more than limit
candies.
Breakdown:
Let’s denote
limit + 1
asL
for simplicity.-
Define sets:
-
A
: Distributions where child 1 gets ≥ L candies -
B
: Distributions where child 2 gets ≥ L candies -
C
: Distributions where child 3 gets ≥ L candies
-
Our task: Count all distributions not in A ∪ B ∪ C
.
Step 3: Use Inclusion-Exclusion Formula 🧮
We start with total distributions (no limits) and subtract distributions where the limit is exceeded:
Answer = Total - |A ∪ B ∪ C|
By Inclusion-Exclusion:
|A ∪ B ∪ C| = |A| + |B| + |C| - |A ∩ B| - |B ∩ C| - |A ∩ C| + |A ∩ B ∩ C|
Calculate Each Term:
- Total (no limits):
T = C(n + 2, 2)
- Number of distributions where one child exceeds the limit:
For child 1 exceeding limit, redefine candies:
a' = a - L ≥ 0
Remaining candies to distribute:
n' = n - L
Number of such distributions for one child:
A = C(n' + 2, 2) = C(n - L + 2, 2)
Since this applies to any of the 3 children:
|A| + |B| + |C| = 3 × A
- Distributions where two children exceed the limit:
Similar reasoning:
n'' = n - 2 × L
Number of such distributions:
B = C(n'' + 2, 2) = C(n - 2 × L + 2, 2)
Number of pairs of children = 3
|A ∩ B| + |B ∩ C| + |A ∩ C| = 3 × B
- Distributions where all three children exceed the limit:
n''' = n - 3 × L
Number of such distributions:
C = C(n''' + 2, 2) = C(n - 3 × L + 2, 2)
Step 4: Final Formula
Putting it all together:
Answer = T - 3 × A + 3 × B - C
where:
T = C(n + 2, 2)
A = C(n - L + 2, 2)
B = C(n - 2 × L + 2, 2)
C = C(n - 3 × L + 2, 2)
Step 5: Efficient Implementation in Code 💻
Let’s implement this in C++, JavaScript and Python.
C++
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
long long comb(int n, int k) {
if (k < 0 || k > n) return 0;
long long res = 1;
for (int i = 1; i <= k; ++i) {
res = res * (n - i + 1) / i;
}
return res;
}
long long distributeCandies(int n, int limit) {
int L = limit + 1;
long long T = comb(n + 2, 2);
long long A = comb(n - L + 2, 2);
long long B = comb(n - 2 * L + 2, 2);
long long C = comb(n - 3 * L + 2, 2);
return T - 3 * A + 3 * B - C;
}
int main() {
cout << distributeCandies(5, 2) << endl; // Output: 3
cout << distributeCandies(3, 3) << endl; // Output: 10
return 0;
}
JavaScript
function comb(n, k) {
if (k < 0 || k > n) return 0;
let res = 1;
for (let i = 1; i <= k; i++) {
res *= (n - i + 1);
res /= i;
}
return res;
}
function distributeCandies(n, limit) {
const L = limit + 1;
const T = comb(n + 2, 2);
const A = comb(n - L + 2, 2);
const B = comb(n - 2 * L + 2, 2);
const C = comb(n - 3 * L + 2, 2);
return T - 3 * A + 3 * B - C;
}
// Example:
console.log(distributeCandies(5, 2)); // Output: 3
console.log(distributeCandies(3, 3)); // Output: 10
Python
def comb(n, k):
if k < 0 or k > n:
return 0
res = 1
for i in range(1, k + 1):
res *= (n - i + 1)
res //= i
return res
def distribute_candies(n, limit):
L = limit + 1
T = comb(n + 2, 2)
A = comb(n - L + 2, 2)
B = comb(n - 2 * L + 2, 2)
C = comb(n - 3 * L + 2, 2)
return T - 3 * A + 3 * B - C
# Example:
print(distribute_candies(5, 2)) # Output: 3
print(distribute_candies(3, 3)) # Output: 10
Conclusion 🎉
This problem is a great example of combining combinatorics with algorithmic optimization. The brute-force approach would be too slow for large inputs, but using the stars and bars theorem and the inclusion-exclusion principle, we can solve it efficiently in constant time after computing binomial coefficients.
Final Thoughts 🎯
Using combinatorics and inclusion-exclusion allows for an O(1) time solution.
Brute-force is inefficient for large inputs but okay for small values.
This problem is a great example of applying mathematical thinking to optimize algorithms.
I hope this step-by-step explanation helps you understand how to tackle distribution problems with constraints. Feel free to share your thoughts or questions!
Top comments (4)
Really love how you made inclusion-exclusion so approachable here, and that constant time trick is awesome.
Have you played with generalizing this to more than 3 children?
Thank you so much for your kind words! 😊 I'm really glad the inclusion-exclusion breakdown and the constant-time optimization came through clearly, I wanted to make the math feel more intuitive and less intimidating.
As for generalizing beyond 3 children, yes, it's definitely possible! The inclusion-exclusion principle scales well for k children, although the number of subsets (and terms) grows exponentially (2^k), which makes the implementation a bit more complex but still very systematic. It’s a fun challenge, and maybe something I could explore in a follow-up post!
Thanks again for engaging, I truly appreciate it! 🙌
Might be worth mentioning the trade-offs
True