Hi there! I'm Maneshwar. Right now, I’m building LiveAPI, a first-of-its-kind tool for helping you automatically index API endpoints across all your repositories. LiveAPI helps you discover, understand, and use APIs in large tech infrastructures with ease.
If you're building anything beyond a TODO app, you'll eventually need to answer this:
"Who gets to access what, and under what conditions?"
That’s where RBAC (Role-Based Access Control) and ABAC (Attribute-Based Access Control) step in. They’re both access control strategies, but they solve the problem differently — and choosing one over the other can shape how your entire security model scales (or breaks).
Let’s dig into both and break down when to use what.
RBAC — Role-Based Access Control
TL;DR: Permissions are assigned to roles, and users get access by being assigned those roles.
Think of RBAC as access control via job titles.
How It Works
You define:
-
Roles (like
Admin
,HR Manager
,Customer Support
) -
Permissions tied to roles (like
edit_employee
,view_ticket
) - Then assign roles to users.
The logic is simple:
If user has role 'HR Manager' → allow action 'edit_employee'
Example: HR App
Let’s say you’re building an HR portal. Here's how roles might be set up:
-
Employee
: Can view their own profile. -
HR Manager
: Can view/edit all employee profiles. -
Recruiter
: Can view candidate pipeline.
// Pseudocode
if (user.roles.includes('HR Manager')) {
allow('edit', 'employee_data');
}
Key Benefits of RBAC
- Easy to understand and implement.
- Permissions grouped logically.
- Works well when user responsibilities are clearly defined.
- Ideal for small teams and fixed org charts.
Where RBAC Starts Cracking
RBAC is great until:
- Users start wearing multiple hats.
- Access depends on more than just role (like location, department, or time).
For example:
What if an HR Manager can only edit employees in their own department?
That’s not easy to express with roles alone — that’s where RBAC starts to leak.
ABAC — Attribute-Based Access Control
TL;DR: Access is determined by evaluating multiple attributes (user, resource, action, environment).
ABAC is like:
"Allow access if user.department == resource.department AND it's during office hours AND their security clearance is high enough."
Components
- Subject: Who's asking? (User attributes like department, title)
- Resource: What are they trying to access? (e.g., file, API)
-
Action: What are they trying to do? (
read
,delete
,transfer
) - Environment: When, where, how? (Time, device, location, IP)
Example: Banking App
Policy:
“Consultants from Radiology can view cardiac imaging documents for their own department, but only during working hours.”
{
"subject.department": "Radiology",
"resource.type": "Cardiac Imaging",
"action": "read",
"environment.time": "09:00-18:00"
}
You build rules that evaluate these attributes on the fly.
Key Benefits of ABAC
- Extremely flexible and fine-grained.
- Can express complex access logic.
- Easy to onboard new users — just assign the right attributes.
- Great for multi-tenant or dynamic environments.
Where ABAC Can Bite
- More complexity up front — need a good policy engine.
- Harder to debug: “Why can’t Jane access this?” isn’t always obvious.
- Requires accurate and updated attribute data (from HRIS, IAM, etc.)
- Needs strong governance to avoid policy sprawl.
🤼♂️ RBAC vs ABAC: Feature Face-Off
Feature | RBAC | ABAC |
---|---|---|
Simplicity | ✅ Easy | ❌ Complex |
Granularity | ❌ Coarse | ✅ Fine-grained |
Scalability | 🚫 Role explosion possible | ✅ Scales well |
Context-aware | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Dynamic access | ❌ No | ✅ Yes |
Maintenance | ✅ Easy roles | ❌ Needs attribute hygiene |
Best for | Fixed orgs, clear job titles | Complex access, multi-tenant SaaS |
When to Use What
Situation | Go with... |
---|---|
Small team, fixed job roles | RBAC |
Building an internal admin panel | RBAC |
Access depends on department, region, or project | ABAC |
SaaS app with tenants and custom logic per org | ABAC |
You want hybrid: use roles and evaluate conditions | RBAC + ABAC |
Hybrid Models: Best of Both Worlds?
Most modern systems (like AWS IAM or Open Policy Agent) support a hybrid approach:
- Use RBAC for the base-level permissions (
can_view_dashboard
). - Layer in ABAC for fine-tuning (
only if user.tenant_id == resource.tenant_id
).
You get the structure of roles with the power of attributes.
Tools That Help
-
RBAC:
- Auth0 Core RBAC
- Casbin (RBAC mode)
- Keycloak Roles
- Django/Node.js role-based libs
-
ABAC:
- Open Policy Agent (OPA)
- Cedar (used by AWS)
- Casbin (ABAC mode)
- Zanzibar-like systems (relationship-based, more like ABAC+RBAC)
Wrapping Up
RBAC is like a good checklist.
ABAC is like a custom-tailored AI decision tree.
Choose RBAC if you want simplicity and clear boundaries.
Choose ABAC if you need flexibility and control over how, when, and why access is granted.
Or do what most mature systems do: use both.
✅ Start with roles.
🔍 Add attributes when things get hairy.
🔐 Sleep better at night.
LiveAPI helps you get all your backend APIs documented in a few minutes
With LiveAPI, you can quickly generate interactive API documentation that allows users to search and execute APIs directly from the browser.
If you’re tired of manually creating docs for your APIs, this tool might just make your life easier.
Top comments (1)
growth like this is always cool to see. kinda hits me that picking access control isn’t just about day one - you think sticking to just roles ever holds teams back as they scale or is it usually something else?