Conservative like woah

Just wondering when Socialist Lampoon's Presidential Vacation will end.

Please tell me it will be over soon.  We're running out of allies to offend, terrorists to hug, and unwarranted apologies to offer.

Now, only one week ago!

These People: http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.…...

Were Sooo sure that the whole OBAMA Fake thing was bull-Dinky, are doing dinky in their pants NOW and even deleting prior posts of support for OBAMA!

Sinking fast, people...Sinking Fast.

According to some sources, at least half of the 50 (At Present) state attorney generals are posed to challenge OBAMA, should he win.
Legal paperwork and motions are already penned. Motions to strongly charge (as in: to remind) the electoral college in this matter are already under way.

The DNC admits that it did not properly Vett OBAMA.

If indeed OBAMA fights to the end, then the DNC will be ruined and Hillery will will unleash her platoon of lawyers, sue,(and most likely win)against the DNC. Then she will start her own party, file motions to delay the election or move quickly to have another election. No One can say for sure if this can happen. However, John McCain may win by Default and that will be the end.

One thing is very probable and that is the ruination of the DNC...

Quick Links to the actual Legal Documents: http://docs.justia.com/cases/feder…...

Quick Link To CITIZEN WELLS STORY: http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/…...

Finally, A Middle Sized Mainstream Newspaper breaks the story..Not the times or the daily news yet but not a bad paper, Posted just a few hours ago: http://www.fayettedailynews.com/ar…... (Since typing this 9 other papers have posted, as well.)

Hear the Interview On OBAMAS Kenyan Grandmothers startling admission about her being present when OBAMA was born in Kenya(!!!) Here: http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/...

So much is happening as I write that I cant keep up with it! (and It's only 4:41 am!!!) The Net and airwaves are exploding with this story and the best thing about it is that it is that the main protagonists are DEMOCRATS! Even his own People think that his deceptions are outrageous.

I don't think it will be long now.....
(In-Comming!!!!)

I'm Voting for Those Not Yet Born

Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
Copyright © 2008 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.

Hey all,

If you are in the Sarasota, FL area, the Republican Party of Florida would LOVE to have you walk door to door with us!

( Collapse )

"Media Upset about US Government Spying on Suspected Terrorists."

I've been more of an observer here, but I think I'll be posting my thoughts here more frequently.

Over in conservatism today, someone posted the following SHOCKING story:

WHY DID CHRISTIANS LET PEOPLE GO THIRSTY?

Long story short: Southern Baptists decided not to hand out water donated by Anheuser-Busch because it had their logo on it.

This set my BS meter off, and it only took a few seconds to dig up a response from the Southern Baptists: They had plenty of water that DIDN'T have the A-B logo on it, noone went thirsty.

I'm really surprised that noone thought to verify that sooner than I did. The original poster was certain that NBC was more trustworty than the Christians (despite the lack of interviews from anyone who actually went thirsty). Noone else expressed any shock at the deceitfulness of the story. Should the Southern Baptists have given out the Anheuser Busch water? I'm certain they would have, barring other choices. Since they did have other choices, I don't think it was an unreasonable choice not to, but I don't expect us to all agree on that.

But watching all of conservatism united in their condemnation of the Southern Baptists was pretty disheartening. Like aurora_requiem (whom I just added as a friend... hope you don't mind!) I think I'll be paying more attention to what's going on here... it definitely seems more Christian-friendly than other conservative forums I've browsed.

So yeah, I pretty much have nothing useful to say, except that I left _gopchristians_. It was just a waste. Sorry, there are some nice people there, but there are some really mean people who wanna pick a fight. If anyone wants to try and convince me to go back, go for it. And HOW am I a troll? WHAT IS A TROLL?? ZOMGawsh!! I keep thinking of those freaky-deaky tie-dye-haired thingies.... *shudders* I mean, I'm really trying not to be one!!

And am I really a bigot? T_T (Please, someone say no.)

*is sad*

*is talking like a middle-schooler and loving it*

So.... people here are actually Christians, right? I mean, I joined _gopchristians_ thinking they were 'my peeps', but it turned out to be a horrible disapointment. Really. So, are YOU guys 'my peeps'? Please, tell me you are!

I was disgusted when I read this. "Politentia" posted it in _debate_now_:

"The United States is violating its own policy of world democracy abroad as well as at home.
In a recent surge of effort to colonize any oil-producing (but politically corrupt) countries, the United States has made its move on the Middle East by invading both Iraq and Afghanistan. Strategically speaking, these were very good moves. Not only are the invaded countries oil-rich (Iraq produces about 2.25 million bbl/day, according to the CIA world factbook), but geographically speaking, it is very important that the United States has at least one outpost in the Middle East. China and India are the two fastest-growing economies in the world today, and with militarily powerful Russia to the north, it is not impossible to forsee a 1984-esque Eurasian alliance within the next half-century. Such an alliance would surely provoke world war if it invaded any country, and it would almost as surely win (for explanation of this statement, look at any political map of the world) due merely to its geographical position. If such superpowers as China, India, and Russia were to war amongst each other, the conflict(s) would result in the deaths of millions of people, with or without world war.
But strategy is never the whole picture. Over 15,000 Iraqi civilians and over 2,000 American soldiers have died for the aforementioned "strategy" since the US-led invasion. Even without Saddam Hussein in power, civil strife has continued in great measure, with suicide bombings terrorizing civilians almost daily. In many cases, living standards have gone down rather than up since the invasion. It is now dangerous for children to walk to school in many areas for fear of the suicide bombers, and any person seen associating with US troops, even to obtain food, is often in danger. In such an environment, it is difficult for liberty to survive, let alone thrive.
So how can the United States fix what it has done? To back out of Iraq now would mean leaving the country in the hands of rebels. How can a brand-new constitution survive in a lawless society? But the longer the United States stays in Iraq, more of the rebels are antagonized, and violence escalates on an almost-daily basis.
Iraq will take a while to recover from the injuries it has been dealt, both by the United States and extremists from within Iraq itself. As soon as stable government and military are established, the United States must withdraw from Iraq, regardless of strategy."

See "comments" for my views on this.

Ousted Alabama Justice to Run for Governor