You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Наше наследие.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Наше наследие.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
File:1970 Ostashev Arkady Ilyich.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Photograph of my father (1970 Ostashev Arkady Ilyich.jpg) I used from the personal archive. A copy of the pictures there are in the funds of the РГАНТД. I hope my copyright is not infringed.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.
Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 08:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
День добрый! Не знаю как Вы определили, что три указанные выше фотографии не являются моими. Я пока в здравом уме и утверждаю, что лично делал снимки у себя в кабинете и около дома в котором проживаю. Mixrunya (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Добрый день! Попытаюсь ещё раз объясниться. Две фотографии: File:Плита на мемориале в Крыму зенитчицам, защищавшим небо Джанкоя.jpg и
File:Мемориал зенитчицам, защищавшим небо Крыма.jpg делались мной при поездке на отдых в Крым, одна удалена, другая оставлена. Не понятно. Фотография мемориала погибшим испытателям на 41 площадке Байконура делается мной каждый год, когда мы прилетаем на траурные мероприятия на космодром, как расценивать авторство? Надеюсь на понимание. Mixrunya (talk) 09:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Вы, видимо, не прочитали пояснение, данное на вышеуказанной странице. Если часть текста выделена синим цветом, это означает, что данный текст содержит гиперссылку на информацию, с которой Вам следует ознакомиться. Прочтите сейчас. Ваши фотографии памятников являются производными работами, поэтому принимаются во внимание авторские права создателей этих памятников. Во многих странах этого требования нет, поскольку там действует так называемая свобода панорамы. Однако ни в Казахстане, ни в России изображения памятников такой свободой не обладают. Из этих работ можно оставить те изображения, где творческий вклад создателя оригинального произведения минимален (оно признаётся тривиальным) или если в производной работе место (форма, размер) оригинального произведения очень несущественно (COM:De minimis). Sealle (talk) 11:57, 21 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Доброе утро! Хотел уточнить, материалы помещённые в 1993 году в РГАНТД (в том числе и фотографии) после смерти отца перешли ко мне как к правоприемнику, даёт ли мне это обстоятельство какие то права на пользование этими материалами. Когда кто то хочет воспользоваться вышеуказанными материалами звонят мне и получают разрешение, но может в Википедии это не имеет значения, хотя связь с работниками архива есть и я могу запросить разрешение использовать фотографии, хранящиеся в архиве. Буду благодарен за ответ. Mixrunya (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Обратите внимание, что авторские права принадлежат не владельцу одного или нескольких экземпляров фотографии, а лицу, сделавшему снимок, будь он хоть кто угодно - фотограф в ателье, случайный прохожий и т.д. Лучше всего будет получить разрешение от работников архива - в точности следуйте процедуре, описанной в COM:OTRS/ru. Sealle (talk) 09:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:
use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.
Мне гораздо удобней общаться на родном языке. Я наверное не очень внимательно разобрался с правилами размещения фотографий в Википедии. У меня уже не первый раз удаляются помещённые мной фотографии. В данном случае фотографии моего отца Аркадия и его брата Евгения я помещал из книги Чертока Б.Е. "Ракеты и люди". В свою очередь Борис Евсеевич брал эти фотографии из нашего семеёного архива. Борис Евсеевич умер в 2011 году. Так же эти фотографии переданы отцом при жизни в 1993 году в РГАНТД, после его смерти права на все материалы, помещённые в архиве переданы документально мне. Как я должен правильно разместить фотографии отца и его брата в соответствующих статьях? Может быть у Вас получится правильно разместить эти фото. Заранее благодарен за внимание к моим проблемам и возможную помощь. Mixrunya (talk) 06:45, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
Уважаемый Mixrunya! Не отчаивайтесь, не всё уж так плохо, как Вам кажется. Да, в законах об авторском праве разобраться довольно сложно, они иногда кажутся абсурдными, но ничего сделать нельзя, приходится их соблюдать. Каждое фото имеет своего автора — фотографа, который и обладает исключительными авторскими правами, кроме случаев, когда фотограф, юридически оформив, передал эти права третьему лицу. Поэтому на все фото, которые Вы сделали сами, авторские права принадлежат Вам и Вы свободно можете загружать их сюда, на Викисклад, за исключением фотографий памятников, скульптур, зданий (здесь надо смотреть COM:FoP и зависит от страны, где размещён объект съёмки). Некоторые фото, автором которых Вы не являетесь, возможно разместить в русскоязычном разделе Википедии как несвободные и иллюстрировать статьи на условиях добросовестного использования. В общем, если хотите, я Вам помогу разместить некоторые фотографии, которые не будут нарушать авторские права и правила Википедии. В этом случае, придётся смотреть по каждой фотографии отдельно, предварительно выслав мне или выложив на любой бесплатный фотохосинг. Для связи со мной можно использовать Википочту, Скайп, Фейсбук, просто почту, что Вам будет удобнее (только заранее напишите мне, как Вам проще общаться, я тогда дам Вам свои контакты). С уважением, --Dogad75 (talk) 08:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Thanks for uploading File:Осташев Е.И. в 1945 году в звании ст. лейтенант.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).
The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Осташев Е.И. в 1945 году в звании ст. лейтенант.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.
Добрый день! Я не уверен, что правильно применил лицензию. Наверное не смог разобраться. Мне казалось, что применённая лицензия снимает все ограничения так как снимок был сделан более 70 лет назад и автор не известен. Если возможно поправте и сохраните фото для использовании в статье "Jewgeni Iljitsch Ostaschew" в немецкоязычной Википедии. Mixrunya (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
В этом году, 4, 5 и 6 октября я был на Байконуре. Ветеранов космоса пригласили на празднование 60-летия полёта первого спутника. Естественно я побывал на месте гибели в 1960 году на 41 пл. военных и гражданских испытателей. Фотоаппарата у меня не было, поэтому сфотографировал на телефон. Приехав домой разместил фотографию в соответствующей статье. Если лицензия подобрана не корректно, прошу помощи. Mixrunya (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Бюст адмиралу Фёдору Ушакову на бульваре Ушакова в Рыбинске.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise,everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No FoP-Russsia. The monument was erected in 1996. The sculptor Е. Пасхина and the architect Н. Лосев are alive.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion
Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2024! Unfortunately, one or several of your pictures violate the contest rule about minimum size wich is 2 Megapixel. Please, check them in the low-res category and reupload bigger version through «upload new version» option near the bottom of the page if you have one. Thank you! -- AVSBot (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Не принимайте это сообщение бота слишком близко "к сердцу". Хотя указанные фотографии не смогут принять участия в конкурсе из-за низкого разрешения, они всё ещё могут быть пригодны в каких-то случаях для иллюстрирования статей Википедии или путеводителей. Olksolo (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.
This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.
Latest comment: 18 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi everyone,
Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.
Here are your top three winning images:
First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area. Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia. Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers. Attribution: public domain
You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results
I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.
Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!