Crying wolf in time of Corona: the strange case of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Is the fear of failure withholding potential life-saving treatment from clinical use?

Nardelli et al., Signa Vitae, doi:10.22514/sv.2021.043, Mar 2021
Mortality 79% improvement lower risk ← → higher risk Ivermectin  Nardelli et al.  META ANALYSIS c19early.org Nardelli et al., Signa Vitae, March 2021 0 0.5 1 1.5 2+ RR
Ivermectin for COVID-19
4th treatment shown to reduce risk in August 2020, now with p < 0.00000000001 from 106 studies, recognized in 24 countries.
No treatment is 100% effective. Protocols combine treatments.
6,600+ studies for 220+ treatments. c19early.org
Meta analysis of RCT mortality results showing RR 0.19, p < 0.00001.
7 meta-analyses show significant improvements with ivermectin for mortality1-6, hospitalization7, recovery3, and cases3.
Currently there are 106 ivermectin for COVID-19 studies, showing 47% lower mortality [34‑58%], 35% lower ventilation [17‑50%], 40% lower ICU admission [12‑58%], 34% lower hospitalization [21‑44%], and 79% fewer cases [69‑86%].
risk of death, 79.5% lower, RR 0.21, p < 0.001, treatment 14 of 703 (2.0%), control 57 of 620 (9.2%), NNT 14, odds ratio converted to relative risk.
Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates
Nardelli et al., 11 Mar 2021, peer-reviewed, 8 authors.
DOI record: { "DOI": "10.22514/sv.2021.043", "URL": "http://dx.doi.org/10.22514/sv.2021.043", "container-title": "Signa Vitae", "container-title-short": "SV", "content-domain": { "crossmark-restriction": false, "domain": [] }, "created": { "date-parts": [ [ 2021, 3, 12 ] ], "date-time": "2021-03-12T05:41:24Z", "timestamp": 1615527684000 }, "deposited": { "date-parts": [ [ 2022, 2, 24 ] ], "date-time": "2022-02-24T19:35:58Z", "timestamp": 1645731358000 }, "indexed": { "date-parts": [ [ 2022, 4, 5 ] ], "date-time": "2022-04-05T20:15:11Z", "timestamp": 1649189711123 }, "is-referenced-by-count": 2, "issued": { "date-parts": [ [ 2021 ] ] }, "link": [ { "URL": "https://oss.signavitae.com/mre-signavitae/article/20210508-344/pdf/3-4%20SV2021022602.pdf", "content-type": "unspecified", "content-version": "vor", "intended-application": "similarity-checking" } ], "member": "26027", "original-title": [], "prefix": "10.22514", "published": { "date-parts": [ [ 2021 ] ] }, "published-online": { "date-parts": [ [ 2021 ] ] }, "published-print": { "date-parts": [ [ 2021 ] ] }, "publisher": "MRE Press", "reference-count": 0, "references-count": 0, "relation": {}, "resource": { "primary": { "URL": "https://www.signavitae.com/articles/10.22514/sv.2021.043" } }, "score": 1, "short-title": [], "source": "Crossref", "subject": [], "subtitle": [], "title": "Crying wolf in time of Corona: the strange case of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Is the fear of failure withholding potential life-saving treatment from clinical use?", "type": "journal-article" }
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. c19early involves the extraction of 200,000+ datapoints from thousands of papers. Community updates help ensure high accuracy. Treatments and other interventions are complementary. All practical, effective, and safe means should be used based on risk/benefit analysis. No treatment or intervention is 100% available and effective for all current and future variants. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and situation. IMA and WCH provide treatment protocols.
Submit