Skip to main content
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Astrophysics > Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

arXiv:2607.18136 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 20 Jul 2026 (v1), last revised 21 Jul 2026 (this version, v2)]

Title:An Unsupervised Search for Novel Instrumental Glitches in LIGO O4a: Multi-Scale Sensitization, Empirical Physical Vetoes, and Rate Upper Limits

Authors:Luca Cirfeta
View a PDF of the paper titled An Unsupervised Search for Novel Instrumental Glitches in LIGO O4a: Multi-Scale Sensitization, Empirical Physical Vetoes, and Rate Upper Limits, by Luca Cirfeta
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:The fourth observing run (O4) of Advanced LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA presents unparalleled sensitivity, rendering unsupervised pipelines highly vulnerable to the non-stationary domain shift of the detectors' noise manifolds. We present DANTE V3, concluding a longitudinal investigation into unmodeled anomalies during early O4a. By expanding to a multi-scale geometric framework (0.5 s to 4.0 s), we amplify morphological sensitivity, extracting 10,372 unique candidates. To mitigate domain-shift artifacts, we introduce a block-bootstrap Domain Shift Defense (DSD) against a vector-quantized native background index. While 28.3% of candidates survive recalibration, global topological analysis reveals they lack discrete morphological cohesion. The survivors coalesce into a single macro-cluster without compact substructure; we show explicitly that morphological "diffusivity" comparisons used previously are confounded and retire them. Pristine background is even more monolithic (100% in one cluster vs 99.77% for survivors): this topology is a property of the embedding geometry, not of anomaly status. Executing a definitive physical environment monitoring (PEM) cross-correlation defense using an empirically calibrated null, one singleton is vetoed by a control-line coupling, while another survives as an uncatalogued instrumental morphological outlier at the window level. Replacing the embedding-similarity cross-detector coincidence test with a physical normalized cross-correlation test, we find no coincident events among 8,749 candidates. We quote 90% frequentist Poisson upper limits on the rate of novel uncatalogued instrumental morphologies -- $R_{90} \le 5.83 \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ (H1) and $R_{90} \le 5.63 \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ (L1). This underscores the absolute necessity of native background recalibration and physical auxiliary vetoes in unsupervised gravitational-wave astronomy.
Comments: 20 pages, 14 images, 8 tables, pipeline: this https URL
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
MSC classes: 83C35, 62G32, 62H30, 62P35
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.4.7; J.2
Cite as: arXiv:2607.18136 [astro-ph.IM]
  (or arXiv:2607.18136v2 [astro-ph.IM] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18136
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Luca Cirfeta [view email]
[v1] Mon, 20 Jul 2026 16:29:15 UTC (6,527 KB)
[v2] Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:45:12 UTC (6,540 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled An Unsupervised Search for Novel Instrumental Glitches in LIGO O4a: Multi-Scale Sensitization, Empirical Physical Vetoes, and Rate Upper Limits, by Luca Cirfeta
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source
license icon view license

Current browse context:

astro-ph.IM
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2026-07
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
gr-qc

References & Citations

  • INSPIRE HEP
  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences