Skip to main content
arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
archive
Search Submit Donate Log in
Press Enter to search · Advanced search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2005.01282 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 May 2020 (v1), last revised 2 Jul 2020 (this version, v2)]

Title:Distributional Discrepancy: A Metric for Unconditional Text Generation

Authors:Ping Cai, Xingyuan Chen, Peng Jin, Hongjun Wang, Tianrui Li
View a PDF of the paper titled Distributional Discrepancy: A Metric for Unconditional Text Generation, by Ping Cai and 4 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:The purpose of unconditional text generation is to train a model with real sentences, then generate novel sentences of the same quality and diversity as the training data. However, when different metrics are used for comparing the methods of unconditional text generation, contradictory conclusions are drawn. The difficulty is that both the diversity and quality of the sample should be considered simultaneously when the models are evaluated. To solve this problem, a novel metric of distributional discrepancy (DD) is designed to evaluate generators based on the discrepancy between the generated and real training sentences. However, it cannot compute the DD directly because the distribution of real sentences is unavailable. Thus, we propose a method for estimating the DD by training a neural-network-based text classifier. For comparison, three existing metrics, bi-lingual evaluation understudy (BLEU) versus self-BLEU, language model score versus reverse language model score, and Fréchet embedding distance, along with the proposed DD, are used to evaluate two popular generative models of long short-term memory and generative pretrained transformer 2 on both syntactic and real data. Experimental results show that DD is significantly better than the three existing metrics for ranking these generative models.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2005.01282 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2005.01282v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.01282
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Peng Jin [view email]
[v1] Mon, 4 May 2020 05:53:34 UTC (1,957 KB)
[v2] Thu, 2 Jul 2020 15:40:14 UTC (1,958 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Distributional Discrepancy: A Metric for Unconditional Text Generation, by Ping Cai and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2020-05
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

DBLP - CS Bibliography

listing | bibtex
Xingyuan Chen
Peng Jin
Hongjun Wang
Tianrui Li
Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders, member institutions, , and all contributors.
About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab)
Major funding support from
Simons Foundation Simons Foundation International Schmidt Sciences