Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral QuizTime Machine
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Parkerite

A valid IMA mineral species - grandfathered
This page is currently not sponsored. Click here to sponsor this page.
Hide all sections | Show all sections

About ParkeriteHide

Formula:
Ni3(Bi,Pb)2S2
May be Pb-free.
Colour:
Pale bronze
Lustre:
Metallic
Hardness:
2
Specific Gravity:
8.4
Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Name:
For mineralogist/petrologist Robert Lüling Parker (1893-1973) Prof. für Mineralogie und Petrographie ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
Comments: The name parkerite was given to mineral-G, a poorly and incompletely characterized species from S. Africa by Scholz (1937). The mineral was presented by Scholz as a nickel sulfide with a suggested formula of Ni2S3 or NiS2, and inexplicably without the Bi (51-64%) and Pb (~9%) being detected. In his study of the ore minerals of the Sudbury area, Michener (1940) noticed a nickel-bismuth sulfide mineral, which appeared to be a new species. The mineral was further investigated by Michener & Peacock (1943), who realized that although the composition and other data did not match that given by Scholz for parkerite, their X-ray powder data was in agreement with the data of Niggli for parkerite, which was appended to Scholz (1937). Rather than describing their mineral as a new species, they fully characterized and redefined it retaining the name parkerite on a specimen from the Frood mine, as well as using synthetic material, retaining the parkerite name given by Scholz (Michener & Peacock 1943). The Frood mine could not be specifically identified by Michener & Peacock at the time due to wartime restrictions. Additional data on parkerite from both type localities are given in Petruk et al. (1969). [Horváth 2003]
See also "lead-parkerite" and the chemically related bismutohauchecornite.
An Sb-bearing parkerite has been reported, too (Goryachev et al., 2004).


Unique IdentifiersHide

Mindat ID:
3122
Long-form identifier:
mindat:1:1:3122:2

IMA Classification of ParkeriteHide

Approved, 'Grandfathered' (first described prior to 1959)
First published:
1937

Classification of ParkeriteHide

2.BE.20

2 : SULFIDES and SULFOSALTS (sulfides, selenides, tellurides; arsenides, antimonides, bismuthides; sulfarsenites, sulfantimonites, sulfbismuthites, etc.)
B : Metal Sulfides, M: S > 1: 1 (mainly 2: 1)
E : With Pb (Bi)
2.3.4.1

2 : SULFIDES
3 : AmBnXp, with (m+n):p = 5:2
5.8.14

5 : Sulphosalts - Sulpharsenites and Sulphobismuthites (those containing Sn, Ge,or V are in Section 6)
8 : Sulpharsenites etc. of Mn, Fe, Co and Ni

Mineral SymbolsHide

As of 2021 there are now IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols (abbreviations) for each mineral species, useful for tables and diagrams.

Please only use the official IMA–CNMNC symbol. Older variants are listed for historical use only.

SymbolSourceReference
PrkIMA–CNMNCWarr, L.N. (2021). IMA–CNMNC approved mineral symbols. Mineralogical Magazine, 85(3), 291-320. doi:10.1180/mgm.2021.43
PrkThe Canadian Mineralogist (2019)The Canadian Mineralogist (2019) The Canadian Mineralogist list of symbols for rock- and ore-forming minerals (December 30, 2019). download

Physical Properties of ParkeriteHide

Metallic
Transparency:
Opaque
Colour:
Pale bronze
Streak:
Black
Hardness:
Tenacity:
Brittle
Cleavage:
Perfect
{001}
Parting:
{111}
Fracture:
Irregular/Uneven
Density:
8.4 g/cm3 (Measured)    8.50 g/cm3 (Calculated)

Optical Data of ParkeriteHide

Anisotropism:
Strong; greenish gray to yellowish brown.
Reflectivity:
WavelengthR1 (%)R2 (%)
400nm43.1%45.0%
420nm44.2%46.0%
440nm45.1%47.0%
460nm45.9%47.8%
480nm46.6%48.4%
500nm47.1%49.0%
520nm47.6%49.5%
540nm48.0%49.9%
560nm48.4%50.4%
580nm48.8%50.7%
600nm49.2%51.1%
620nm49.6%51.5%
640nm50.0%51.9%
660nm50.4%52.3%
680nm50.7%52.7%
700nm51.0%53.0%


Graph shows reflectance levels at different wavelengths (in nm). Peak reflectance is 53.0%.
R1 shown in black, R2 shown in red
Colour in reflected light:
Light cream colored.
Pleochroism:
Visible
Comments:
Greenish-grey to yellowish-brown, even slate-blue to salmon-pink.

Chemistry of ParkeriteHide

Mindat Formula:
Ni3(Bi,Pb)2S2

May be Pb-free.
Element Weights:
Element% weight
Bi63.503 %
Ni26.753 %
S9.744 %

Calculated from ideal end-member formula.

Crystallography of ParkeriteHide

Crystal System:
Monoclinic
Cell Parameters:
a = 11.0666(1) Å, b = 8.085(1) Å, c = 11.458(1) Å
β = 90°
Ratio:
a:b:c = 1.369 : 1 : 1.417
Unit Cell V:
1,025.19 ų (Calculated from Unit Cell)
Z:
4
Morphology:
Grains and cleavage fragments.
Twinning:
Lamellar on (111).
Comment:
C2/m, Cm C2

Crystal StructureHide

Load
Unit Cell | Unit Cell Packed
2x2x2 | 3x3x3 | 4x4x4
Show
Big Balls | Small Balls | Just Balls | Spacefill
Polyhedra Off | Si Polyhedra | All Polyhedra
Remove metal-metal sticks
Display Options
Black Background | White Background
Perspective On | Perspective Off
2D | Stereo | Red-Blue | Red-Cyan
View
CIF File    Best | x | y | z | a | b | c
Rotation
Stop | Start
Labels
Console Off | On | Grey | Yellow
IDSpeciesReferenceLinkYearLocalityPressure (GPa)Temp (K)
0000318ParkeriteFleet M E (1973) The crystal structure of parkerite (Ni3Bi2S2) American Mineralogist 58 435-43919730293
CIF Raw Data - click here to close

X-Ray Powder DiffractionHide

Powder Diffraction Data:
d-spacingIntensity
2.836 Å(100)
2.864 Å(65)
2.336 Å(55)
3.98 Å(30)
4.04 Å(25)
1.989 Å(25)
1.648 Å(25)
Comments:
Synthetic

Geological EnvironmentHide

Paragenetic Mode(s):
Paragenetic ModeEarliest Age (Ga)
High-? alteration and/or metamorphism
33 : Minerals deposited by hydrothermal metal-rich fluids (see also [#12])

Type Occurrence of ParkeriteHide

Other Language Names for ParkeriteHide

Dutch:Parkeriet
German:Parkerit
Spanish:Parkerita

Common AssociatesHide

Associated Minerals Based on Photo Data:
10 photos of Parkerite associated with ChalcopyriteCuFeS2
5 photos of Parkerite associated with SobolevskitePdBi
4 photos of Parkerite associated with StumpflitePtSb
4 photos of Parkerite associated with Taimyrite(Pd,Cu,Pt)3Sn
4 photos of Parkerite associated with GalenaPbS
3 photos of Parkerite associated with PaolovitePd2Sn
3 photos of Parkerite associated with BorniteCu5FeS4
3 photos of Parkerite associated with MagnetiteFe2+Fe3+2O4
2 photos of Parkerite associated with QuartzSiO2
2 photos of Parkerite associated with TalnakhiteCu9(Fe,Ni)8S16

Related Minerals - Strunz-mindat GroupingHide

2.BE.DulanggouiteBi6Te3Trig. 3m (3 2/m) : P3m1
2.BE.ZipseriteBi5S4Trig. 3m (3 2/m) : R3m
2.BE.05BetekhtinitePb2(Cu,Fe)22-24S15Orth. mmm (2/m 2/m 2/m) : Immm
2.BE.10Furutobeite(Cu,Ag)6PbS4Mon.
2.BE.15ShanditeNi3Pb2S2Trig. 3m (3 2/m) : R3m
2.BE.15RhodplumsiteRh3Pb2S2Trig. 3m (3 2/m) : R3m
2.BE.25Schlemaite(Cu,◻)6(Pb,Bi)Se4Mon. 2/m : P21/m
2.BE.30PašavaitePd3Pb2Te2Orth. mmm (2/m 2/m 2/m) : Pmmn

Other InformationHide

Magnetism:
Non-Magnetic
Electrical:
Good electrical conductor.
Notes:
Etch reactions: HNO3, blackens instantly; HCl, negative; KCN, negative; FeCl3, blackens instantly; KOH, negative; HgCl2, stains iridescent.
Health Risks:
No information on health risks for this material has been entered into the database. You should always treat mineral specimens with care.

Internet Links for ParkeriteHide

References for ParkeriteHide

Reference List:

Localities for ParkeriteHide

This map shows a selection of localities that have latitude and longitude coordinates recorded. Click on the symbol to view information about a locality. The symbol next to localities in the list can be used to jump to that position on the map.

Locality ListHide

- This locality has map coordinates listed. - This locality has estimated coordinates. ⓘ - Click for references and further information on this occurrence. ? - Indicates mineral may be doubtful at this locality. - Good crystals or important locality for species. - World class for species or very significant. (TL) - Type Locality for a valid mineral species. (FRL) - First Recorded Locality for everything else (eg varieties). Struck out - Mineral was erroneously reported from this locality. Faded * - Never found at this locality but inferred to have existed at some point in the past (e.g. from pseudomorphs).

All localities listed without proper references should be considered as questionable.
Antarctica
 
  • East Antarctica
    • Queen Maud Land
Takahashi et al. (2020)
Australia
 
  • Western Australia
    • Boddington Shire
      • Bannister
Kalleske (2010)
    • East Pilbara Shire
      • Nullagine
Marston (1984)
    • Laverton Shire
      • Laverton
Groves et al. (1978)
Austria
 
  • Styria
    • Bruck-Mürzzuschlag District
      • Pernegg an der Mur
        • Kirchdorf
Kolitsch et al. (2010)
    • Liezen District
      • Schladming
        • Obertalbach valley
Strasser (1989)
    • Murau District
      • Neumarkt in der Steiermark
        • Dürnstein
Auer (2019)
  • Tyrol
    • Innsbruck-Land District
      • Neustift im Stubaital
        • Habicht
Auer (2024)
Canada
 
  • British Columbia
    • New Westminster Mining Division
      • Hope
Manor
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
    • Labrador
      • Voisey´s Bay
Huminicki et al. (2008)
  • Northwest Territories
    • Great Slave Lake
Badham et al. (1980)
      • East Arm area
Badham et al. (1980)
Badham et al. (1980)
Anthony et al. (1990)
  • Ontario
    • Algoma District
      • McMurray Township
Wehrle et al. (2023)
    • Greater Sudbury
      • Blezard Township
Ames et al. (2003)
      • Creighton-Davies Township
Ames et al. (2003)
      • Denison Township
Szentpeteri et al. (2003)
      • Drury Township
        • Worthington area
          • Worthington Offset Dike
Ames et al. (2003)
      • Levack Township
Ames et al. (2003) +1 other reference
Ames et al. (2003)
Springer (1989) +1 other reference
Springer (1989)
      • Maclennan Township
Ames et al. (2003)
      • McKim Township
Ames et al. (2003)
SCHOLZ (1937) +4 other references
    • Sudbury District
      • Snider Township
Ames et al. (2003)
157-158. +1 other reference
    • Timiskaming District
      • Cobalt-Gowganda region
Dana's New Mineralogy +2 other references
          • Casey Township
Can Mineral December 1971 v. 11 no. 1 ... +3 other references
Dana's New Mineralogy
China
 
  • Beijing
    • Yanqing District
Chengmu Fan and Chongyao Cao (1991)
  • Guizhou
    • Zunyi
      • Bozhou District
        • Zunyi Ni-Mo-PGE-Au ore field
Nansheng Chen (1996)
Nansheng Chen (1996)
  • Hunan
    • Zhangjiajie
      • Cili Co.
Nansheng Chen (1996)
  • Qinghai
    • Haixi Mongol and Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture
      • Golmud City (Ge'ermu Co.)
        • Wutumeiren
Han et al. (2020)
  • Shaanxi
    • Baoji
      • Taibai County
Jingwen Mao et al. (2002) +2 other references
  • Shanxi
    • Yuncheng
      • Yuanqu Co.
        • Zhongtiaoshan ore field
Qiu et al. (2017)
  • Yunnan
    • Honghe
      • Jinping County
Wang et al. (2006)
    • Qujing
      • Zhanyi District
Nansheng Chen (1996)
  • Zhejiang
    • Shaoxing
      • Yuecheng District
        • Lizhu ore field (Lichu ore field)
Nansheng Chen (1996)
Czech Republic
 
  • Central Bohemian Region
    • Příbram District
      • Háje
Škácha et al. (2021)
  • Karlovy Vary Region
Ondruš et al. (2003)
    • Sokolov District
      • Horní Slavkov
        • Horní Slavkov uranium ore district
Sejkora J. et al. (Česká republika)
  • South Bohemian Region
    • Písek District
      • Kovářov
        • Vepice
Sejkora et al. (2020)
  • South Moravian Region
    • Blansko District
      • Letovice
Fojt B.
Egypt
 
  • Red Sea Governorate
    • Wadi Allaqi District
      • Wadi Haimur
Helmy et al. (1995)
Finland
 
  • North Ostrobothnia
    • Nivala
Kojonen K: K. (Cu,Fe) +1 other reference
Germany
 
  • Rhineland-Palatinate
    • Altenkirchen
      • Daaden-Herdorf
        • Schutzbach
Schnorrer et al. (1997)
  • Saxony
    • Vogtlandkreis
      • Bösenbrunn
        • Schönbrunn
Wittern (2001)
India
 
  • Jharkhand
    • East Singhbhum District
      • Mosaboni
Narasimhan et al. (1980) +1 other reference
Ivory Coast
 
  • Montagnes
    • Tonkpi
      • Biankouma Department
Gouedji et al. (2014)
Japan
 
  • Ibaraki Prefecture
    • Kasama City
      • Iwama
Haruna (2002)
North Macedonia
 
  • Lipkovo Municipality
Đorđević et al. (2017)
Norway
 
  • Vestland
    • Stad
      • Selje
        • Årsheim
Pinet et al. (1985)
Russia
 
  • Irkutsk Oblast
    • Uda–Biryusa district
Mekhonoshin et al. (2013) +2 other references
  • Kamchatka Krai
    • Koryak Okrug
      • Olyutorsky district
        • Korf
Sidorov et al. (2019)
  • Krasnoyarsk Krai
    • Maimecha and Kotui Rivers Basin
Dvorani (2016)
    • Taymyrskiy Autonomous Okrug
      • Taimyr Peninsula
- (2014)
          • Talnakh Cu-Ni Deposit
Pavel M. Kartashov collection +2 other references
  • Murmansk Oblast
Neradovskii et al. (1982)
    • Kolsky District
    • Monche tundra intrusion
Chashchin et al. (2018)
    • Olenegorsk
Bazai et al. (2009)
    • Pechengsky District
Anatoly Kasatkin analytical data
[World of Stones 95:5-6
  • Sverdlovsk Oblast
    • Malyshevo
Koroteev et al. (2017) +1 other reference
  • Tuva
    • Tes-Khemsky District
Palyanova et al. (2018)
  • Zabaykalsky Krai
    • Shelopuginsky District
Yurgenson et al. (2023)
South Africa (TL)
 
  • Eastern Cape
    • Alfred Nzo District Municipality
      • Umzimvubu Local Municipality
        • Insizwa
Brower et al. (1974) +1 other reference
  • Limpopo
    • Waterberg District Municipality
      • Mogalakwena Local Municipality
        • Mokopane
Van der Merwe (2011)
Hutchinson et al. (2005)
Spain
 
  • Andalusia
    • Málaga
      • Mijas
Oen et al. (1980) +2 other references
      • Ojén
        • Ojén lherzolite massif
Gervilla et al. (1990)
Gervilla et al. (2002)
      • Sierra Alpujata
Oen et al. (1980)
  • Aragon
    • Teruel
      • Loscos
Lopez Ciriano et al. (1997)
Sweden
 
  • Örebro County
    • Askersund
      • Zinkgruvan
Bjärnborg (2009)
  • Södermanland County
    • Nyköping
      • Tunaberg
Dobbe (1991)
Dobbe (1991)
Tanzania
 
  • Kagera Region
    • Ngara District
Maier et al. (2010)
UK
 
  • England
    • Devon
      • West Devon
        • Peter Tavy
          • Devon United Mines
Rumsey et al. (2005) +1 other reference
USA
 
  • Arizona
    • La Paz County
      • Eagletail Mts (Cemetary Ridge)
Haxel et al. (2023)
  • Minnesota
    • St. Louis County
      • Ely-Hoyt Lakes Area
McSwiggen (1999)
Vietnam
 
  • Sơn La Province
    • Bắc Yên District
      • Ban Phuc
Glotov et al. (2001)
 
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: December 4, 2025 05:32:25 Page updated: October 22, 2025 14:15:47
Go to top of page