My Debian package produces a lintian error:
rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar: extra-license-file usr/lib/rhythmbox/plugins/alternative-toolbar/LICENSE
This is because the source contains the LICENSE file - and Debian rules for packaging state that all license information should be within the copyright file of the package.
I'm using autotools automake for building - my debian/rules looks like this:
#!/usr/bin/make -f include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/autoreconf.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/utils.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/gnome.mk include /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/uploaders.mk include /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/gnome-version.mk -include /usr/share/gnome-pkg-tools/1/rules/gnome-get-source.mk DEB_DH_AUTORECONF_ARGS := --as-needed ./autogen.sh # List any files which are not installed common-binary-post-install-arch:: list-missing
My initial thought was to include an override_dh_auto_install statement in the rules to strip out the LICENSE file but this seems to be ignored (or doesn't work) if I add the following at the bottom of the current rules
override_dh_auto_install:
find . -name "LICENSE" -delete
dh_auto_install
Thus to my question - how do I remove the LICENSE file when building a Debian package ?
Note - I don't want to artificially hide the lintian error with some sort of override - I want to ensure the built package doesn’t include the extra LICENSE file.
cdbs, notdh, sodhoverrides won't work. Lintian isn't complaining about there being aLICENSEfile in the source code though, it's complaining about it being installed in the binary package; so if you can remove it from the installed files, you should be OK. (I don't know much aboutcdbsthough so I can't really help.)