This came out of one of my comments to this question regarding the use of bc in shell scripting.  bc puts line breaks in large numbers, e.g.:
> num=$(echo 6^6^3 | bc)
> echo $num
12041208676482351082020900568572834033367326934574532243581212211450\ 20555710636789704085475234591191603986789604949502079328192358826561\ 895781636115334656050057189523456
But notice they aren't really line breaks in the variable -- or at least there are not if it is used unquoted. For example, in fooling around with more pipe in the assignment, e.g.:
num=$(echo 6^6^3 | bc | perl -pne 's/\\\n//g')
I realized that while there really is an \n in the bc output, checking echo $num > tmp.txt with hexdump shows the \n (ASCII 10) has definitely become a space (ASCII 32) in the variable assignment.
Or at least, in the output of unquoted $num >. Why is that?
As fedorqui points out, if you use quotes: echo "$num", you get newlines again.  This is evident by examining the difference between echo $num > tmp.1 and echo "$num" > tmp.2 with hexdump; the former contains \ (backslash space) whereas the later contains \\n (backslash newline).


echoing, it shows new lines but with trailing slash:echo "$num".cat -Aa good intermediate for looking at this kind of thing before going tohexdumpor the like. Egecho 6^6^3 | bc | cat -A.echoing is important to keep the original format. Hence, you have to trust the quotedechowhen working with some text.