930

Is there an elegant way to access the first property of an object...

  1. where you don't know the name of your properties
  2. without using a loop like for .. in or jQuery's $.each

For example, I need to access foo1 object without knowing the name of foo1:

var example = {
    foo1: { /* stuff1 */},
    foo2: { /* stuff2 */},
    foo3: { /* stuff3 */}
};
1
  • 1
    it's probably better to transform it into an Array first Commented Mar 24, 2017 at 14:32

23 Answers 23

1951
var obj = { first: 'someVal' };
obj[Object.keys(obj)[0]]; //returns 'someVal'

Object.values(obj)[0]; // returns 'someVal'

Using this you can access also other properties by indexes. Be aware tho! Object.keys or Object.values return order is not guaranteed as per ECMAScript however unofficially it is by all major browsers implementations, please read https://stackoverflow.com/a/23202095 for details on this.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

12 Comments

You say that it's not the fastest way. What way would be faster?
This is not very efficient as it creates an entire array of all of the object's keys.
@T Nguyen I would post it if i knew it :)
@DavChana - You had your benchmark set up wrong. The boilerplate block will always be executed and your block 2 was empty, meaning the first result represents execution boilerplate+block1, and the second result represents only boilerplate. Here is the correct benchmark: http://jsben.ch/#/R9aLQ, showing they are pretty much equal (run the test multiple times).
I wish first() or something similar could handle this.
|
165

Try the for … in loop and break after the first iteration:

for (var prop in object) {
    // object[prop]
    break;
}

4 Comments

I think this is about the only option. I'm not sure you're guaranteed that the properties will be iterated in a predictable/useful order though. I.e., you may intend foo1 but get foo3. If the properties are numbered as in the example, you could do a string compare to ascertain the identifier ending in '1'. Then again, if ordinality is the main concern of the collection, you should probably use an array instead of an object.
If anyone else is concerned about the order, most browsers behave predictably: stackoverflow.com/questions/280713/…
var prop; for (prop in object) break; //object[prop]
Old answer but. You might want to check if the property belongs to the object. like: for(..){ if(!obj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) continue; .... break; } just in case the object is actually empty it does not traverses the prototype or something.
156

You can also do Object.values(example)[0].

3 Comments

This is not available in all browsers, referencing stackoverflow.com/a/38748490/719689
Update from 2019, I think that this works on most browsers except for IE developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…
@theUtherSide the ordering is the same for all Object.keys, Object.values and for...in, only significant difference is that for...in loops also on prototype chain therefore you have to check manually for hasOwnProperty() there.
60

You can use Object.values() to access values of an object:

var obj = { first: 'someVal' };
Object.values(obj)[0]; // someVal

1 Comment

Simplest and easiest way of doing this
57

Use Object.keys to get an array of the properties on an object. Example:

var example = {
    foo1: { /* stuff1 */},
    foo2: { /* stuff2 */},
    foo3: { /* stuff3 */}
};

var keys = Object.keys(example); // => ["foo1", "foo2", "foo3"] (Note: the order here is not reliable)

Documentation and cross-browser shim provided here. An example of its use can be found in another one of my answers here.

Edit: for clarity, I just want to echo what was correctly stated in other answers: the key order in JavaScript objects is undefined.

Comments

27

A one-liner version:

var val = example[function() { for (var k in example) return k }()];

1 Comment

Sometimes it can be risky to use for in without checking hasOwnProperty as the object contain other unwanted values appended to it programmatically so you could end up getting an unwanted result from this snippet. Just because its short and neat doesn't mean its safe optimal.
26

There isn't a "first" property. Object keys are unordered.

If you loop over them with for (var foo in bar) you will get them in some order, but it may change in future (especially if you add or remove other keys).

2 Comments

Awesome. I've been using an object to implement a map that maintains insertion order. That breaks once I remove a value because the next insertion fills in the gap. :(
key / value order should preserved in newer versions of JS
18

Here is a cleaner way of getting the first key:

var object = {
    first: 1,
    second: 2,
    third: 3,
    fourth: 4
};

let [firstKey] = Object.keys(object)
let [ , secondKey] = Object.keys(object)
let [ , , thirdKey] = Object.keys(object)

console.log(firstKey, secondKey, thirdKey)
console.log(object[firstKey], object[secondKey])

2 Comments

But why the array around [first]. User did not request an array as the answer. Why do this over first = Object.keys(example)[0] which will do the same without needing to wrap the answer in an array. Why is yours cleaner please?
15

The top answer could generate the whole array and then capture from the list. Here is an another effective shortcut

var obj = { first: 'someVal' };
Object.entries(obj)[0][1] // someVal

Comments

12

Solution with lodash library:

_.find(example) // => {name: "foo1"}

but there is no guarantee of the object properties internal storage order because it depends on javascript VM implementation.

3 Comments

Just tested this, and it doesn't work. It returns the value only, not the key/value pair.
There is no mention in the question that it should return the key/value pair, he just asks for the object and the accepted answer does just as much as this lodash function: it returns the content of the first property. It might not suit your specific needs, but this answer IS correct based on the original question.
Yes does the job, useful when you know your object will have only one child object var object = { childIndex: { .. } }; var childObject = _.find(Object);
9

To get the first key name in the object you can use:

var obj = { first: 'someVal' };
Object.keys(obj)[0]; //returns 'first'

Returns a string, so you cant access nested objects if there were, like:

var obj = { first: { someVal : { id : 1} }; Here with that solution you can't access id.

The best solution if you want to get the actual object is using lodash like:

obj[_.first(_.keys(obj))].id

To return the value of the first key, (if you don't know exactly the first key name):

var obj = { first: 'someVal' };
obj[Object.keys(obj)[0]]; //returns 'someVal'

if you know the key name just use:

obj.first

or

obj['first']

Comments

9

if someone prefers array destructuring

const [firstKey] = Object.keys(object);

Comments

8

No. An object literal, as defined by MDN is:

a list of zero or more pairs of property names and associated values of an object, enclosed in curly braces ({}).

Therefore an object literal is not an array, and you can only access the properties using their explicit name or a for loop using the in keyword.

1 Comment

For others only seeing the green tick on this answer, there is another solution further down the page with currently 350 upvotes.
3

This has been covered here before.

The concept of first does not apply to object properties, and the order of a for...in loop is not guaranteed by the specs, however in practice it is reliably FIFO except critically for chrome (bug report). Make your decisions accordingly.

Comments

3

I don't recommend you to use Object.keys since its not supported in old IE versions. But if you really need that, you could use the code above to guarantee the back compatibility:

if (!Object.keys) {
Object.keys = (function () {
var hasOwnProperty = Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,
    hasDontEnumBug = !({toString: null}).propertyIsEnumerable('toString'),
    dontEnums = [
      'toString',
      'toLocaleString',
      'valueOf',
      'hasOwnProperty',
      'isPrototypeOf',
      'propertyIsEnumerable',
      'constructor'
    ],
    dontEnumsLength = dontEnums.length;

return function (obj) {
  if (typeof obj !== 'object' && typeof obj !== 'function' || obj === null) throw new TypeError('Object.keys called on non-object');

  var result = [];

  for (var prop in obj) {
    if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, prop)) result.push(prop);
  }

  if (hasDontEnumBug) {
    for (var i=0; i < dontEnumsLength; i++) {
      if (hasOwnProperty.call(obj, dontEnums[i])) result.push(dontEnums[i]);
    }
  }
  return result;
}})()};

Feature Firefox (Gecko)4 (2.0) Chrome 5 Internet Explorer 9 Opera 12 Safari 5

More info: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/keys

But if you only need the first one, we could arrange a shorter solution like:

var data = {"key1":"123","key2":"456"};
var first = {};
for(key in data){
    if(data.hasOwnProperty(key)){
        first.key = key;
        first.content =  data[key];
        break;
    }
}
console.log(first); // {key:"key",content:"123"}

Comments

1

If you need to access "the first property of an object", it might mean that there is something wrong with your logic. The order of an object's properties should not matter.

1 Comment

You're right. I don't need the first one, per se, but just one of the foo properties so I can work with it. I only need one and wasn't sure if there was a way just to grab the "first" one without using for ... in.
1

A more efficient way to do this, without calling Object.keys() or Object.values() which returns an array:

Object.prototype.firstKey = function () {
  for (const k in this) {
    if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(this, k)) return k;
  }
  return null;
};

Then you can use it like:

const obj = {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}
console.log(obj.firstKey()) //=> 'a'

This doesn't necessarily return the first key, see Elements order in a "for (… in …)" loop

Comments

0

we can also do with this approch.

var example = {
  foo1: { /* stuff1 */},
  foo2: { /* stuff2 */},
  foo3: { /* stuff3 */}
}; 
Object.entries(example)[0][1];

Comments

0

This is an old question but most of the solutions assume that we know the attribute's name which it is not the case for example if you are trying to visualize data from files that the user can upload or similar cases.

This is a simple function that I use and works in both cases that you know the variable and if not it will return the first attribute of the object (sorted alphabetically)

The label function receives an object d and extract the key if exits, otherwise returns the first attribute of the object.

const data = [
  { label: "A", value: 10 },
  { label: "B", value: 15 },
  { label: "C", value: 20 },
  { label: "D", value: 25 },
  { label: "E", value: 30 }
]

const keys = ['label', 0, '', null, undefined]

const label = (d, k) => k ? d[k] : Object.values(d)[0]

data.forEach(d => {
  console.log(`first: ${label(d)}, label: ${label(d, keys[0])}`)
})

keys.forEach(k => {
  console.log(`label of ${k}: ${label(data[0], k)}`)
})

For values like 0, '', null, and undefined will return the first element of the array.

Comments

0

this is my solution

  const dataToSend = {email:'[email protected]',password:'12345'};
   const formData = new FormData();
      for (let i = 0; i < Object.keys(dataToSend).length; i++) {
     formData.append(Object.keys(dataToSend)[i], 
         Object.values(dataToSend)[i]);
      }

  console.log(formData);

Comments

-1

Any reason not to do this?

> example.map(x => x.name);

(3) ["foo1", "foo2", "foo3"]

1 Comment

Because .map() only exists for built-in iterables
-1

Basic syntax to iterate through key-value gracefully

const object1 = {
  a: 'somestring',
  b: 42
};

for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object1)) {
  console.log(`${key}: ${value}`);
}

// expected output:
// "a: somestring"
// "b: 42"

1 Comment

See "Explaining entirely code-based answers". While this might be technically correct it doesn't explain why it solves the problem or should be the selected answer. We should educate in addition to help solve the problem.
-4

As others have pointed out, if the order of properties is important, storing them in an object is not a good idea. Instead, you should use an array via square brackets. E.g.,

var example = [ {/* stuff1 */}, { /* stuff2 */}, { /* stuff3 */}];
var first = example[0];

Note that you lose the 'foo' identifiers. But you could add a name property to the contained objects:

var example = [ 
  {name: 'foo1', /* stuff1 */},
  {name: 'foo2', /* stuff2 */},
  {name: 'foo3', /* stuff3 */}
];
var whatWasFirst = example[0].name;

For those seeking an answer to a similar question, namely: "How do I find one or more properties that match a certain pattern?", I'd recommend using Object.keys(). To extend benekastah's answer:

for (const propName of Object.keys(example)) {
  if (propName.startsWith('foo')) {
    console.log(`Found propName ${propName} with value ${example[propName]}`);
    break;
  }
}

2 Comments

there are situations in which we can't. We're assuming we can't change the fact that they're not in an array
I think it's useful to push back on the design a bit for readers who can control their JSON schema. Essentially, I'm extending Flavius Stef's answer with some examples.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.