Python lambda returns 0 [closed]

Question

Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.

Want to improve this question? As written, this question is lacking some of the information it needs to be answered. If the author adds details in comments, consider editing them into the question. Once there's sufficient detail to answer, vote to reopen the question.

Closed 3 months ago.

Improve this question

Is there a simple way to return 0 with a lambda function using and and or operators? For example, consider this function to sum elements in an array:

sum = lambda tab: tab == [] and 0 or tab[0] + sum(tab[1:])

Neutral element for number addition is 0 so it produces an IndexError: 0 is a falsy value.

Thus with multiplication it works:

>>> prod = lambda tab: tab == [] and 1 or tab[0] * prod(tab[1:])
>>> prod([1, 2, 3])
6

Other numbers than 0, for example 1, are truthy.

I would 100% just make this a full function. lambdas lose their readability pretty quickly. — Carcigenicate
– Carcigenicate, Commented Jul 29 at 13:45
I have no idea what your lambda is doing and when it should return 0. Maybe first write it as normal function - so you could use print() to test values - and later try to reduce it to one line. — furas
– furas, Commented Jul 29 at 13:46
Shouldn't it be as simple as if/else? Why do you need to juggle and/ors? — VLAZ
– VLAZ, Commented Jul 29 at 13:46
@trincot It's just an example... to illustrate the problem with 0 in this situation of using and and or. — david
– david, Commented Jul 29 at 14:05

no comment · Accepted Answer · 2025-07-29 14:08:45Z

1

I usually do it without or:

sum = lambda tab: len(tab) and tab[0] + sum(tab[1:])

print(sum([1, 2, 3]))

But if you insist on it:

sum = lambda tab: tab and tab[0] + sum(tab[1:]) or 0

print(sum([1, 2, 3]))

answered Jul 29 at 14:08

no comment

10.9k5 gold badges21 silver badges44 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Stef Jul 30 at 8:25

I know the op used sum as the name of their function, but your answer might be used as a reference by many people in the future, and using sum as a name is bad practice in python since it shadows a builtin, so I recommend changing the name to anything else in your answer.

no comment Jul 30 at 14:58

@Stef Yeah I'm not a fan of that, but I dislike mismatches between answers and questions more. Besides, who would use this instead of the built-in? And it even takes quadratic time and memory.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Python lambda returns 0 [closed]

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Related