8
enum KINDS {
  STATIC = 1,
  FIELD,
  ARG,
  VAR
}

enum ALL_KINDS {
  STATIC = 1,
  FIELD,
  ARG,
  VAR,
  NONE
}

How can I reuse the first enum inside the second one?

2
  • By "re-use" you mean you want ALL_KINDS to include the entries, with the same values, from KINDS? Commented Sep 29, 2019 at 19:13
  • Yup @DaveNewton. Commented Sep 29, 2019 at 20:07

1 Answer 1

4

AFAIK, extending enums is under consideration, in the meantime you can use const objects instead:

const KINDS = <const>{
  STATIC: 1,
  FIELD: 2,
  ARG: 3,
  VAR: 4
};

const ALL_KINDS = <const>{ ...KINDS, NONE: 5 };

There are also other workarounds in the above thread.

If you want this type to be checked, note that from the type perspective, a numeric enum is equivalent to number:

enum KINDS {
  STATIC,
  FIELD,
  ARG,
  VAR
}

declare function func(name: string, type: string, kind: KINDS): any;

func('foo', 'bar', KINDS.ARG); // compiles
func('foo', 'bar', 99); // compiles too (?)

If you use an object as suggested above, you can also enforce strict type checking by creating a type for all possible values of that object:

const KINDS = <const>{
  STATIC: 1,
  FIELD: 2,
  ARG: 3,
  VAR: 4
};

type KIND_VALUE = typeof KINDS[keyof typeof KINDS]

declare function define(name: string, type: string, kind: KIND_VALUE): any;

define('foo', 'bar', KINDS.ARG); // compiles
define('foo', 'bar', 99); // doesn't compile

This is a bit more verbose, but then you have your type actually checked.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

In the method declaration, define(name: string, type: string, kind: KINDS) {}, it shows an error 'KINDS' refers to a value , but is being used as a type here. That is way I used enum.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.