170

In AngularJs we could make a directive attribute required. How do we do that in Angular with @Input? The docs don't mention it.

Eg.

@Component({
  selector: 'my-dir',
  template: '<div></div>'
})
export class MyComponent {
  @Input() a: number; // Make this a required attribute. Throw an exception if it doesn't exist.
  @Input() b: number;
}
1
  • 4
    In May 2023, Angular version 16, They added required like @Input({ required: true }) a: number. See Ruslan's answer below stackoverflow.com/a/76187833/1730846 Commented May 10, 2023 at 15:39

10 Answers 10

263

For Angular 16 and newer

The @Input() directive now directly supports marking something as required:

@Input({ required: true }) myRequiredInput!: unknown;

This change works on both Components and Directives.

Official solution (Angular 15 and below)

As answered by Ryan Miglavs – smart usage of Angular's selectors solves the issue.

/** Note: requires the [a] attribute to be passed */
@Component({
  selector: 'my-dir[a]', // <-- use attribute selector along with tag to ensure both tag name and attribute are used to "select" element by Angular in DOM
});
export class MyComponent {
  @Input() a: number;
}

Personally I prefer this solution in most cases, as it doesn't require any additional effort during the coding time. However, it has some disadvantages:

  • it's not possible to understand what argument is missing from the error thrown
  • error is confusing itself as it says, that tag isn't recognized by Angular, when just some argument is missing

Both of these negatives can be partially ameliorated by adding a decorative comment above the @Component decorator as seen above, and most editors will show that along with any tooltip information for the component name. It does not help with the Angular error output though.


For alternative solutions – look below, they require some additional codding, but doesn't have disadvantages described above.


So, here is my solution with getters/setters. IMHO, this is quite elegant solution as everything is done in one place and this solution doesn't require OnInit dependency.

Solution #2

Component({
  selector: 'my-dir',
  template: '<div></div>',
});
export class MyComponent {
  @Input()
  get a() {
    throw new Error('Attribute "a" is required');
  }
  set a(value: number) {
    Object.defineProperty(this, 'a', {
      value,
      writable: true,
      configurable: true,
    });
  }
}

Solution #3:

It could be done even easier with decorators. So, you define in your app once decorator like this one:

function Required(target: object, propertyKey: string) {
  Object.defineProperty(target, propertyKey, {
    get() {
      throw new Error(`Attribute ${propertyKey} is required`);
    },
    set(value) {
      Object.defineProperty(target, propertyKey, {
        value,
        writable: true,
        configurable: true,
      });
    },
    configurable: true
  });
}

And later in your class you just need to mark your property as required like this:

Component({
  selector: 'my-dir',
  template: '<div></div>',
});
export class MyComponent {
  @Input() @Required a: number;
}

Explanation:

If attribute a is defined - setter of property a will override itself and value passed to attribute will be used. Otherwise - after component init - first time you want to use property a in your class or template - error will be thrown.

Note: getters/setters works well within Angular's components/services, etc and it's safe to use them like this. But be careful while using this approach with pure classes outside Angular. The problem is how typescript transpiles getters/setters to ES5 - they are assigned to prototype property of the class. In this case we do mutate prototype property which will be the same for all instances of class. Means we can get something like this:

const instance1 = new ClassStub();
instance1.property = 'some value';
const instance2 = new ClassStub();
console.log(instance2.property); // 'some value'
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

15 Comments

nice use of the decorator -- scales well
What if I pass null/undefined to the property?
Same Here. "configurable: true" seems to not working anymore
You need to add the configurable: true flag to the parent Object.defineProperty call in the Required decorator. Otherwise, it throws a "can't redefine" error. Looks like the author left it out
The decorator approach doesn't seem to work even with configurable: true
|
83

Check in ngOnInit() (inputs aren't yet set when the constructor is executed) whether the attribute has a value.

Component({
    selector: 'my-dir',
    template: '<div></div>'
})
export class MyComponent implements OnInit, OnChanges {
    @Input() a:number; // Make this a required attribute. Throw an exception if it doesnt exist
    @Input() b:number;

    constructor(){
    }

    ngOnInit() {
       this.checkRequiredFields(this.a);
    }

    ngOnChanges(changes) {
       this.checkRequiredFields(this.a);
    }

    checkRequiredFields(input) {
       if(input === null) {
          throw new Error("Attribute 'a' is required");
       }
    }
}

You might also check in ngOnChanges(changes) {...} if the values wasn't set to null. See also https://angular.io/docs/ts/latest/api/core/OnChanges-interface.html

10 Comments

You might also want to check for undefined and give a specific error message for that... if a value is passed by the attribute and it's misspelled or undefined for some other reason, this will call attention to that fact more quickly, which will make it easier to debug.
Better onChanges since it's called when changes happen as init comes laters
Good point. It might depends on what you try to accomplish. ngOnInit is a good place if the initial value should be checked, ngOnChanges if every update should be checked as well.
@GünterZöchbauer And what's the difference (honest question, not rhetorical) ? If I'm developing a custom Component and I don't want it to be used without a specific Input, why is this solution "rather ugly" for you ? IMO the compiler (or your IDE) tells you about the fact that the component is misused (even if I reckon that the message is not that clear), so that's even better than waiting for a runtime error...
@MichaelTrouw I fully agree . I just tried to offer a workaround with what is available.
|
61

The official Angular way to do this is to include the required properties in the selector for your component. So, something like:

/** Note: requires the [a] attribute to be passed */
Component({
    selector: 'my-dir[a]', // <-- Check it
    template: '<div></div>'
})
export class MyComponent {
    @Input() a:number; // This property is required by virtue of the selector above
    @Input() b:number; // This property is still optional, but could be added to the selector to require it

    constructor(){

    }

    ngOnInit() {
        
    }
}

The advantage to this is that if a developer does not include the property (a) when referencing the component in their template, the code won't compile. This means compile-time safety instead of run-time safety, which is nice.

The bummer is that the error message the developer will receive is "my-dir is not a known element", which isn't super clear.

That negative can be partially ameliorated by adding a decorative comment above the @Component decorator as seen above, and most editors will show that along with any tooltip information for the component name. It does not help with the Angular error output though.

I tried the decorator approach mentioned by ihor, and I ran into issues since it applies to the Class (and therefore after TS compilation to the prototype), not to the instance; this meant that the decorator only runs once for all copies of a component, or at least I couldn't find a way to make it work for multiple instances.

Here are the docs for the selector option. Note that it actually allows very flexible CSS-style selector-ing (sweet word).

I found this recommendation on a Github feature request thread.

10 Comments

"The official Angular way to do this is to include the required properties in the selector for your component" Can you please post a reference to this? I couldn't find anything official from Angular that would state this. Thanks!
@AlexSzabó alxhub (from Angular core team) said that is the recommended way: github.com/angular/angular/issues/18156#issuecomment-316233637
@developer033 The problem with this approach is the error message is misleading. It leads you to believe that your component hasn't been registered with Angular via some module, when in fact, you just forgot to add a required attribute. I would also contest that this is the "official Angular way" to do this simply because a contributor mentioned it was a recommended way. Like I said, it results in an extremely misleading and hard to debug error being thrown.
@developer033 It literally says "official Angular way" in the answer. Just saying. I realize this isn't YOUR answer. Until Angular says this is how to do it on their style guide, I will disregard a one off comment on a long closed issue from a core team member. Cheers.
Actually inputs should be mandatory by default, to mirror how it is in TypeScript and make it more fail-fast.
|
16

Very simple and adaptive way to declare required field

Many answers are already showing this official technique. What if you want to add multiple required fileds? Then do the following:

Single required field

@Component({
  selector: 'my-component[field1]',
  templateUrl: './my-component.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./my-component.component.scss']
})

Multiple fields and all are required

@Component({
  selector: 'my-component[field1][field2][field3]',
  templateUrl: './my-component.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./my-component.component.scss']
})

Multiple fields but atleast one will be required

@Component({
  selector: 'my-component[field1], my-component[field2], my-component[field3]',
  templateUrl: './my-component.component.html',
  styleUrls: ['./my-component.component.scss']
})

Here is how to use in html

<my-component [field1]="value" [field2]="value" [field3]="value"></my-component>

2 Comments

You should note that the use of the attribute selector (ie. my-component[field1]) does not work when you use CUSTOM_ELEMENTS_SCHEMA in your app.module.ts (as it allows any HTML element to be used)
It is nice, the only catch is that the error message in not intuitive.
12

Since Angular v16 you can easily use required inputs feature. Just add required option to @Input:

@Component(...)
export class MyComponent {
  @Input({ required: true }) title: string = '';
}

Documentation: https://angular.io/api/core/Input#required

Comments

7

Why not use the @angular/forms library to validate your @Inputs? The following solution:

  • Fails fast (not just when the @input value is accessed by the component for the first time)
  • Allows re-using rules that you've already used for your Angular forms

Usage:

    export class MyComponent {

      @Input() propOne: string;
      @Input() propTwo: string;

      ngOnInit() {
        validateProps<MyComponent>(this, {
          propOne: [Validators.required, Validators.pattern('[a-zA-Z ]*')],
          propTwo: [Validators.required, Validators.minLength(5), myCustomRule()]
        })
      }
    }

Utility function:

    import { FormArray, FormBuilder, ValidatorFn, FormControl } from '@angular/forms';

    export function validateProps<T>(cmp: T, ruleset: {[key in keyof T]?: ValidatorFn[]} ) {
      const toGroup = {};
      Object.keys(ruleset)
        .forEach(key => toGroup[key] = new FormControl(cmp[key], ruleset[key]));
      const formGroup = new FormBuilder().group(toGroup);
      formGroup.updateValueAndValidity();
      const validationResult = {};
      Object.keys(formGroup.controls)
        .filter(key => formGroup.controls[key].errors)
        .forEach(key => validationResult[key] = formGroup.controls[key].errors);
      if (Object.keys(validationResult).length) {
        throw new Error(`Input validation failed:\n ${JSON.stringify(validationResult, null, 2)}`);
      }
    }

Stackblitz

1 Comment

Great solution, @Stephen Paul! I was searching for a robust solution for an internal lib and found this. Btw, I've made few modifications (less loops, variables, etc.) You can check it here. Thanks for sharing this :)
4

You can do it like this:

constructor() {}
ngOnInit() {
  if (!this.a) throw new Error();
}

1 Comment

This is wrong here, because if you do provide the value 0, this will throw the error, as 0 is one of the falsy values in JS. the test this.a === undefined or this.a == undefined (also testing for null) would allow 0 to be given, and still make the value required.
3

I was able to make @ihor 's Required decorator work using this in the second Object.defineProperty. this forces decorator to define property on each instance.

export function Required(message?: string) {
    return function (target: Object, propertyKey: PropertyKey) {
        Object.defineProperty(target, propertyKey, {
            get() {
                throw new Error(message || `Attribute ${String(propertyKey)} is required`);
            },
            set(value) {
                Object.defineProperty(this, propertyKey, {
                    value,
                    writable: true
                });
            }
        });
    };
}

Comments

2

For me, I had to do it this way:

ngOnInit() {
    if(!this.hasOwnProperty('a') throw new Error("Attribute 'a' is required");
}

FYI, If you want to require @Output directives, then try this:

export class MyComponent {
    @Output() myEvent = new EventEmitter(); // This a required event

    ngOnInit() {
      if(this.myEvent.observers.length === 0) throw new Error("Event 'myEvent' is required");
    }
}

Comments

2

Here is another TypeScript decorator based approach that is less complicated and easier to understand. It also supports Component inheritance.


// Map of component name -> list of required properties
let requiredInputs  = new Map<string, string[]>();

/**
 * Mark @Input() as required.
 *
 * Supports inheritance chains for components.
 *
 * Example:
 *
 * import { isRequired, checkRequired } from '../requiredInput';
 *
 *  export class MyComp implements OnInit {
 *
 *    // Chain id paramter we check for from the wallet
 *    @Input()
 *    @isRequired
 *    requiredChainId: number;
 *
 *    ngOnInit(): void {
 *      checkRequired(this);
 *    }
 *  }
 *
 * @param target Object given by the TypeScript decorator
 * @param prop Property name from the TypeScript decorator
 */
export function isRequired(target: any, prop: string) {
  // Maintain a global table which components require which inputs
  const className = target.constructor.name;
  requiredInputs[className] = requiredInputs[className] || [];
  requiredInputs[className].push(prop);
  // console.log(className, prop, requiredInputs[className]);
}

/**
 * Check that all required inputs are filled.
 */
export function checkRequired(component: any) {

  let className = component.constructor.name;
  let nextParent = Object.getPrototypeOf(component);

  // Walk through the parent class chain
  while(className != "Object") {

    for(let prop of (requiredInputs[className] || [])) {
      const val = component[prop];
      if(val === null || val === undefined) {
        console.error(component.constructor.name, prop, "is required, but was not provided, actual value is", val);
      }
    }

    className = nextParent.constructor.name;
    nextParent = Object.getPrototypeOf(nextParent);
    // console.log("Checking", component, className);
  }
}


Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.