When we use the sort file command,
the file shows its contents in a sorted way. What if I don't want to get any output on stdout, but in the input file instead?
7 Answers
You can use the -o, --output=FILE option of sort to indicate the same input and output file:
sort -o file file
Without repeating the filename (with bash brace expansion)
sort -o file{,}
⚠️ Important note: a common mistake is to try to redirect the output to the same input file
(e.g. sort file > file). This does not work as the shell is making the redirections (not the sort(1) program) and the input file (as being the output also) will be erased just before giving the sort(1) program the opportunity of reading it.
5 Comments
GNU sort info page: -o OUTPUT-FILE' --output=OUTPUT-FILE' Write output to OUTPUT-FILE instead of standard output. On newer systems, -o' cannot appear after an input file if POSIXLY_CORRECT' is set, e.g., sort F -o F'. Portable scripts should specify -o OUTPUT-FILE' before any input files.in-place sorting. This redirection could go last with the note. But definitely not first.--output. I forgot an additional hyphen in my hurry also put the output option last, which is what you would do when you are used to redirection. When you do everything properly it just works of course. :-)The sort command prints the result of the sorting operation to standard output by default. In order to achieve an "in-place" sort, you can do this:
sort -o file file
This overwrites the input file with the sorted output. The -o switch, used to specify an output, is defined by POSIX, so should be available on all version of sort:
-o Specify the name of an output file to be used instead of the standard output. This file can be the same as one of the input files.
If you are unfortunate enough to have a version of sort without the -o switch (Luis assures me that they exist), you can achieve an "in-place" edit in the standard way:
sort file > tmp && mv tmp file
Comments
sort file | sponge file
This is in the following Fedora package:
moreutils : Additional unix utilities
Repo : fedora
Matched from:
Filename : /usr/bin/sponge
1 Comment
sudo apt install moreutilsHere's an approach which (ab)uses vim:
vim -c :sort -c :wq -E -s "${filename}"
The -c :sort -c :wq portion invokes commands to vim after the file opens. -E and -s are necessary so that vim executes in a "headless" mode which doesn't draw to the terminal.
This has almost no benefits over the sort -o "${filename}" "${filename}" approach except that it only takes the filename argument once.
This was useful for me to implement a formatter directive in a nanorc entry for .gitignore files. Here's what I used for that:
syntax "gitignore" "\.gitignore$"
formatter vim -c :sort -c :wq -E -s
1 Comment
nanorc? Oh the irony.Do you want to sort all files in a folder and subfolder overriding them?
Use this:
find . -type f -exec sort {} -o {} \;
1 Comment
To sort file in place, try:
echo "$(sort your_file)" > your_file
As explained in other answers, you cannot directly redirect the output back to the input file. But you can evaluate the sort command first and then redirect it back to the original file. In this way you can implement in-place sort.
Similarly, you can also apply this trick to other command like paste to implement row-wise appending.
1 Comment
echo can mess with backslash escapes in POSIX, and -o does work for the same file as input as explained at: stackoverflow.com/a/29244387/895245
filewith the sorted contents of the same file? The way your question is currently stated, doing nothing at all is a correct answer (you don't want any output, so don't do anything).sort infile >outfileand you'll get the sorted output into file "outfile". Then you can erase the original "infile" and everything will be ok.