public class ReflectionSample
{
private Object mString = null;
private int mValue;
public ReflectionSample()
{
}
public ReflectionSample(int oValue)
{
mValue = oValue;
}
public ReflectionSample(String oString)
{
mString = oString;
}
public ReflectionSample(String oString, int oValue)
{
setValues(oString, oValue);
}
public void setValues(String oString, int oValue)
{
mString = oString;
mValue = oValue;
}
public String toString()
{
return ""+mString+":"+mValue;
}
public void run()
{
String oInput = "Teststring";
Class<?> cls;
String clsname = "main.ReflectionSample";
Object rs = null; // ReflectionSample
Object rsc = null;
System.out.println(this.getClass().getName());
try
{
System.out.println(clsname);
cls = Class.forName(clsname);
if(cls == null)
{
System.err.println(clsname + " doesn't exist");
return;
}
// Look for a constructor which has a single string
Constructor<?> ct = null;
Class<?>[] param_types = new Class<?>[1];
Object[] arguments = new Object[1];
param_types[0] = String.class;
// get the string constructor
ct = cls.getConstructor(param_types);
// We only have one object
arguments = new Object[1];
arguments[0] = oInput;
// Instantiate the object with passed in argument.
rs = ct.newInstance(arguments);
System.out.println("String constructor sample: "+rs);
// Instantiate with default constructor
param_types = new Class<?>[0];
arguments = new Object[0];
ct = cls.getConstructor(param_types);
rs = ct.newInstance(arguments);
rsc = rs; // Keep it for later, to lazy to call it again
System.out.println("Default constructor sample: "+rs);
// Instantiate with string and int constructor
param_types = new Class<?>[2];
arguments = new Object[2];
// Must be in the same order as the params I think
param_types[0] = String.class;
param_types[1] = Integer.TYPE; // <-- Its a primitive so use TYPE not Class
arguments[0] = oInput;
arguments[1] = new Integer(1);
ct = cls.getConstructor(param_types);
rs = ct.newInstance(arguments);
System.out.println("String plus int constructor sample: "+rs);
// call the setValues method
param_types[0] = String.class;
param_types[1] = Integer.TYPE; // <-- Its a primitive so use TYPE not Class
arguments[0] = oInput;
arguments[1] = 1;
System.out.println("setValues invocation before: "+rsc);
Method m = cls.getMethod("setValues", param_types);
m.invoke(rsc, arguments);
System.out.println("setValues invocation after: "+rsc);
// An alternative method to pass the parameters
m = cls.getMethod("setValues", String.class, Integer.TYPE);
m.invoke(rsc, oInput+"x", 2);
System.out.println("setValues invocation after: "+rsc);
}
catch(Throwable e)
{
System.err.println(e.getLocalizedMessage());
}
}
}
Output:
main.ReflectionSample
main.ReflectionSample
String constructor sample: Teststring:0
Default constructor sample: null:0
String plus int constructor sample: Teststring:1
setValues invocation before: null:0
setValues invocation after: Teststring:1
Hope this helps.
I don't know if this is a newer feature in Java, but I have seen that you can use invoke now with parameters as well, instead of using an array, which might make your code better to read (This is the alternative way). If you need a variable number of arguments and you don't know beforehand how many there will be, allocating the array is defeinitly working and should also be backwardcompatible.