Re: PHP 6

From: Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:50:05 +0000
Subject: Re: PHP 6
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Jones
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Lester Caine wrote:
>
>> Currently maintaining the 5.2 branch is essential until such time as all
>> extensions are available in official builds of PHP on windows! Forcing
>> projects to change their development platforms simply to support a blinkered
>> set of rules on PHP is not helpful in moving the project forward. How many
>> extensions are currently stable in 5.2 on windows but not supported in 5.3?
>> Private builds of the extensions in 5.3 are running without problems ....
>> but having to direct users to other sites is as bad as the current
>> fragmentation in the core code?
>>
>
> Nobody is arguing against maintaining 5.2 for the near-mid future.
> If you want Windows binaries, start building . . . .

No need to, there were two missing, firebird and smnp. Smnp is back,
firebird will likely be as well in 5.3.3 (thanks to Marius work).

-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org


Thread (113 messages)

« previous php.internals (#47168) next »