Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Artificial intelligence

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Artificial Intelligence. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Artificial intelligence|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Artificial Intelligence. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

This list includes sublists of deletion debates on articles related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Artificial Intelligence.


Artificial intelligence

edit

Coupler.io

edit
Coupler.io (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely promotional and appears to fail WP:NORG. Amigao (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brightpick

edit
Brightpick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure I really see the CCS here, but here are the sources, which are mostly not so much TRADES as plainly advertisments:

[1] WP:TECHCRUNCH product announcement,
[2] announcement, publisher Peerless Media openly states their publications are for generating high-quality leads and driving motivated buyers to your website.
[3] is WTWH, same.
[4] tech.eu funding announcement.
[5] same on funding announcement, dunno if the site marks advertorials,
[6] is Peerless Media again,
[7] DC Velocity is less obvious about it but they're Omeda
[8], as mentioned, Peerless Media
[9], product announcement, fails ORGIND, I'm dubious about Monsoon Media but they don't outright say their content is advertising, I guess.
[10] doesn't actually exist
[11] non-notable award

Most of the sources are ads. We can't host a marketing brochure based on ads even if they're not as blatant about it as they might be. Other available sources are also ads or industry advocacy, but regardless of whether acceptable sources exist, this article would have to be fundamentally rewritten to be based on those sources instead of these ones. Pinging Sagotreespirit who marked the article as reviewed on 29 Oct and ChildrenWillListen who requested G15 22 Sep, for comments given that context. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AEXA

edit
AEXA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. There is a decent amount of local news coverage but that's not enough for NCORP. I would have restored the redirect to Agencia Espacial Mexicana, but there doesn't appear to be any mention of anything by that title there. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I could not find sufficient sourcing for the subject to meet WP: GNG in my WP: BEFORE. The existing sources are from entities that closely collaborated with the subject (e.g. NASA) or are trivial mentions (e.g. The Independent, Freethink). HyperAccelerated (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alecto AI

edit
Alecto AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the founder of the organization, Breeze Liu, may be notable, the organization does not seem to be notable itself. Per consideration of the current article's sources and a WP:BEFORE, the organization is only mentioned in passing in relation to the founder's activism, but there is no in-depth coverage of the organization itself. WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:10, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sunseeker Robotics

edit
Sunseeker Robotics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). The only reliable, secondary coverage I could find of them is the cited Register review of one of their products. The rest of the coverage of them online is press releases. Previously tagged for proposed deletion; this was contested without comment by article creator. Wikishovel (talk) 11:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikishovel, all the content is sourced from non-press-release websites, and they are all well-known sites (CNET, The Register, The Gadgeteer). None of the content involves participation from the brands, and it is all neutral information. Please review it again. Thank you. Leefranklawyer (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
    1. Oswald, Ed (2024-09-10). "Sunseeker Orion X7 review: A great robot lawn mower with a subpar app". PC World. Archived from the original on 2025-11-24. Retrieved 2025-11-24.

      The review notes: "The Orion X7 is new, so there were bound to be some problems; every robot mower I’ve tested to date has had one quirk or another. It’s not impossible to set up, you just need to have some patience. And with any luck, it’s a process you might need to do just once. Problems of this nature are magnified at a mower at this price, because buying a higher-end robot mower brings higher expectations when it comes to babysitting the tool—and this toddler requires quality hands-on time at the outset. Every other element of the Sunseeker Orion X7—from its innovative floating cutting plates to its impressive AI and vision capabilities, which make it great for people who want to mow at night—is the best I’ve seen."

    2. Hart, Spencer (2025-05-25). "I've been reviewing a GPS robot mower for a month – now I'll never mow my lawn manually again. After a month with the Sunseeker X5, my lawn looks like a golf course – and I haven't lifted a finger". Stuff.tv. Archived from the original on 2025-06-19. Retrieved 2025-11-24.

      The review notes: "For the past month, I’ve handed the job over to a robot – the Sunseeker Elite X5, to be precise – and it’s been quietly transforming my garden into something that looks professionally maintained. ... I’ve tested robot mowers before, including a Flymo that looked like a giant plastic pumpkin. The Sunseeker X5 is the opposite. It’s all clean lines, low profile, finished in black and grey – smart without being shouty. ... Of course, it’s not perfect. The biggest thing is that it doesn’t quite get to the very edges of the lawn, so you’ll still need a quick once-over with a strimmer every week or so. One morning, I got a notification saying the mower was stuck – it had dipped a wheel into a flowerbed and couldn’t find its way out. The issue wasn’t so much that it got stuck (we all have off days), but that it kept trying to free itself, spinning its wheels and gouging out a decent chunk of lawn in the process."

    3. Speed, Richard (2025-11-01). "Robotic lawnmower uses AI to dodge cats, toys: The Sunseeker Elite X5 can mow on its own, but it doesn't come cheap". The Register. Archived from the original on 2025-11-24. Retrieved 2025-11-24.

      The review notes: "The tentacles of AI seem to be reaching everywhere, even to the humble lawnmower. We tested the Sunseeker Elite X5, a robotic mower that uses machine learning to steer around your lawn, to see what happens when artificial intelligence meets whirling blades of doom. ... In use, the X5 is quiet, effective, and efficient. While we couldn't help but hum the theme to Robocop while it did its thing, the resulting finish and stripes were impressive, although the need to set the cutting height manually is an annoyance, as is the requirement for two power sockets. The device is well-adapted for the UK climate and will return to its charger if it detects rain."

    4. Prospero, Mike (2025-09-05). "The Sunseeker X3 Plus robot lawnmower has been trimming my yard all summer - 3 things I like and 1 I don't". Tom's Guide. Archived from the original on 2025-11-24. Retrieved 2025-11-24.

      The review notes: "The Sunseeker X3 Plus is a nice little robot lawnmower for those who have yards that aren’t too big or too steep. It’s easy to set up — I would never recommend buying a robot lawnmower that requires a boundary wire — and it did a good job at keeping my grass trimmed throughout the summer. Still, it’s not foolproof, as it got caught on what I thought were pretty low-profile obstacles. And, while I haven’t reviewed them, the Sunseeker X3 costs the same, or more than, other robot lawnmowers that are more capable on paper."

    5. Carrick, Tony; Morgan, Kate (2025-06-02). "The 5 Best Robot Lawn Mowers Cut Grass Perfectly So You Don't Have To". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 2025-11-24. Retrieved 2025-11-24.

      The review notes: "The Sunseeker L22 relies on ultrasonic technology and bumper sensors to weave around trees and avoid landscaping beds or other obstacles that might interrupt a rectangular mowing path. It even allows you to fine-tune how close it gets to obstacles as it works its way around them, so you can give delicate landscaping features a wide berth. If it does bump into something, it also has a safety mechanism that will halt the mower in its tracks."

    There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow the Sunseeker brand to pass Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)#Primary criteria, which requires "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject".

    Cunard (talk) 05:43, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:46, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 02:46, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Artificial_intelligence&oldid=1325484425"