3
\$\begingroup\$

I am trying to compare theoretical results with the simulation of the following amplifier.

Schematic of the amplifier.

The respective values are $$V_\mathrm{CC} = 12\,\text{V}, R_\mathrm{B} = 470\,\text{k}\Omega, R_\mathrm{C} = 2\,\text{k}\Omega, R_\mathrm{load} = 8\,\text{k}\Omega, C_1 = C_2 = 22\,\mathrm{nF}, \beta = 100,$$ where β is the DC current gain.

Putting together the basic equations, we have \begin{equation} I_\mathrm{C} = \beta I_\mathrm{B} = \beta\left(\frac{V_\mathrm{CC} - V_\mathrm{BE}}{R_\mathrm{B}}\right) = 100\left(\frac{12 - 0.7}{470\cdot10^{3}}\right)\approx 2\,\mathrm{mA}, \end{equation} transconductance \begin{equation} g_\mathrm{m} = \frac{I_\mathrm{C}}{V_\mathrm{T}} = 80\,\mathrm{mS}, \end{equation} and resistance \begin{equation} r_\pi = \frac{\beta}{g_\mathrm{m}} = 1.25\,\mathrm{k}\Omega. \end{equation}

Using these values to establish the hybrid-pi model, we get an auxiliary schematic.

Hybrid-pi model.

I am interested in voltage gain, which should be the calculation equal to \begin{equation} A_\mathrm{u} = \dfrac{v_\mathrm{out}}{v_\mathrm{in}} = \dfrac{-i_\mathrm{C}\dfrac{R_\mathrm{C}R_\mathrm{load}}{R_\mathrm{C} + R_\mathrm{load}}}{v_\mathrm{BE}} = -\dfrac{g_\mathrm{m}v_\mathrm{BE}\dfrac{R_\mathrm{C}R_\mathrm{load}}{R_\mathrm{C} + R_\mathrm{load}}}{v_\mathrm{BE}} = -g_\mathrm{m} \frac{R_\mathrm{C}R_\mathrm{load}}{R_\mathrm{C} + R_\mathrm{load}} = -128. \end{equation}

Trying to compare this to a simulation, I used LTSpice with the following schematic

LTSpice schematic.

The selected transistor is 2SC4083 with the SPICE model

.model 2SC4083 NPN(Is=1.0000E-15 Bf=93.539 Vaf=100 Ikf=31.168E-3 Ise=175.74E-15 Ne=2.2255 Br=4.1981 Var=100 Ikr=1.5983 Isc=25.314E-15 Nc=1.5008 Nk=.20045 Rb=10 Rc=3.8727 Cje=2.3961E-12 Mje=.21324 Cjc=1.1921E-12 Mjc=.1498 Tf=34.367E-12 Xtf=26.703 Vtf=21.035 Itf=.73447 Tr=45.521E-9 Xtb=1.5000 Vceo=11 Icrating=0.05 mfg=Rohm)

I admit that this selection might be the potential problem, because I chose it based on the DC gain being close to 100.

Finally, there is my problem. I wanted to compare the theoretical gain to the simulation. The input voltage source is \begin{equation} v_\mathrm{in}\left(t\right) = 0.1\sin{\left(2\pi 100 t\right)}. \end{equation}

When I run the simulation, I receive the following plot. Blue is the input voltage, and the green one is the output voltage. LTSpice results.

The output signal is attenuated and not inverted. This goes significantly against the theoretical calculations. What might be the source of the error?

\$\endgroup\$
7
  • \$\begingroup\$ Because of the high gain (>100) the input signal is too large. Try Vin=1mV. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31 at 8:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ That is a really awful class A amplifier to make a comparison against. What made you choose it and what are the dc operating points you calculated at the collector for both. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31 at 9:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ Humphrey, What's the reactance of the input and output capacitors at 100 Hz? Have you considered the idea of reducing your input signal from 100 mV peak to 1 mV peak and increasing the capacitor values by a factor of 1 million? See if that gets you an output that is inverted relative to your input signal and closer to your gain value. Do also remember that in your configuration (grounded emitter) that the gain will vary with the signal. So keep the signal very tiny in order to avoid too much confusion due to that source of distortion. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31 at 10:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ Humphrey, Here's my .TRAN run results using your exact circuit except for larger capacitor values. I find \$A_v=\frac{6.2748013\:\text{V}\,-\,6.1794972\:\text{V}}{700\:\mu\text{V}}\approx 136\$. Your capacitor values (or, alternatively, input frequency) are the dominant elephant in the room that needs to be addressed. There's a lot more to say, once that is dealt with. But that's job #1, right now. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31 at 10:10
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ It is a very unreliable biasing arrangement that is also a problem. Yes, I noted Antonio's answer as being correct @HumphreyAppleby \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 31 at 10:29

1 Answer 1

6
\$\begingroup\$

After having choosed components, make a DC Analysis to see working "point", if it is ok.

You should first make an AC Analysis

Made with microcap v12

enter image description here

You could then make a choice of your frequency and amplitude ...
In the bandpass, you could choose 10 kHz with an amplitude of 1 mV.
This help making Transient Analysis.

As value of capacitors are too "low", you choose then an "high" frequency.

enter image description here

If you choose a much lower frequency (100 Hz), then you could be "surprised".

enter image description here

Note the gain in the two circuits.

\$\endgroup\$

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.